http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5612
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5612
--- Comment #7 from Russel Winder rus...@russel.org.uk 2011-02-27 05:51:03
PST ---
David has already reported the cannot cope with multiple CPUs bug as Issue
4462, dated 2010-07-14. So no movement on that after 7 months :-(
I think this pair
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5612
--- Comment #8 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2011-02-27 06:46:37 PST ---
(In reply to comment #7)
David has already reported the cannot cope with multiple CPUs bug as Issue
4462, dated 2010-07-14. So no movement on that after 7 months :-(
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5612
--- Comment #4 from Russel Winder rus...@russel.org.uk 2011-02-20 02:51:59
PST ---
I don't agree this is an enhancement, it is a bug, even if the 64-bit stuff is
in early days. OpenMP, OpenMPI, just::thread and all the other C, C++ and
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5612
Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bra...@puremagic.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5612
--- Comment #6 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2011-02-20 08:40:20 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
I don't agree this is an enhancement, it is a bug,
It's neither. It is a task. Bugzilla's options are ridiculously limited.
Why is this
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5612
David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|core.cpuid broken on 64 |core.cpuid not
