http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6169
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6169
--- Comment #16 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-07-07 21:09:32 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/c2647ba31e7a60ccc354e67aad3a05ceaf7b75
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6169
--- Comment #15 from Kenji Hara 2013-07-01 08:01:17 PDT
---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Not fully fixed for @safe. The conditions to reproduce are a bit complicated
> actually. It requires attribute inference, mixin and default args (!) I'm no
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6169
monarchdo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIX
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6169
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
--- Comment #13
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6169
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6169
--- Comment #11 from yebblies 2013-05-11 20:51:44 EST ---
(In reply to comment #10)
>
> A reduction of that code:
>
>
> int foo() {
> int x = 0;
> int bar() {
> return x;
> }
> enum y = bar();
> return 0;
> }
> en
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6169
--- Comment #10 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-05-04 11:11:40 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> pure nothrow int foo() {
> int x = 1;
> nothrow int bar(int y) { // nonpure
> x++;
> return x + y;
> }
>
> pure n
/42d1af1635fec1c43bbda6c4a3894e148ca6fc22
Fix Issue 6169 - [CTFE] pure functions cannot compute constants using functions
not marked as pure
When running semantic on an expression used anywhere that forces compile time
evaluation, use a scope flag to prevent purity and safety checks on function
calls.
This allows better purity/safety
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6169
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hst...@quickfur.ath.cx
--- Comment #8 from
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6169
--- Comment #7 from yebblies 2013-01-31 23:03:40 EST ---
This bug is exactly where it has been for the last year - awaiting approval
from Walter.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are re
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6169
monarchdo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||monarchdo...@gmail.com
--- Com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6169
--- Comment #5 from yebblies 2012-04-28 15:02:07 EST ---
*** Issue 7994 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail becaus
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6169
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6169
--- Comment #3 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2011-06-17 06:57:25 PDT ---
Interestingly, it does not apply to nothrow unless interpreting the function
fails :). I think this is a diagnostics bug:
int foo(){return 0;}
int bar(){assert(0);}
void main() n
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6169
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
--- Comment #2 from Don 2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6169
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- Com
17 matches
Mail list logo
