[Issue 6333] The 'capacity' function is not pure/nothrow/@safe.

[via Digitalmars-d-bugs]

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6333

--- Comment #5 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/druntime

https://github.com/dlang/druntime/commit/0c87ca709a5386eaebc900ae9aca4ab585e1facc
fix Issue 6333 - The 'capacity' function is not pure/nothrow/@safe

https://github.com/dlang/druntime/commit/3ac2b3b97347fa444c627d17bbeae0ddc22b01a8
Merge pull request #1588 from WalterBright/fix6333

fix Issue 6333 - The 'capacity' function is not pure/nothrow/@safe

--

[Issue 6333] The 'capacity' function is not pure/nothrow/@safe.

[via Digitalmars-d-bugs]

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6333

github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--

[Issue 6333] The 'capacity' function is not pure/nothrow/@safe.

[via Digitalmars-d-bugs]

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6333

--- Comment #4 from Walter Bright  ---
https://github.com/dlang/druntime/pull/1588

--

[Issue 6333] The 'capacity' function is not pure/nothrow/@safe.

[via Digitalmars-d-bugs]

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6333

Walter Bright  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com

--- Comment #3 from Walter Bright  ---
The error is now down to:

test2.d(3): Error: safe function 'test2.f6333' cannot call system function
'object.capacity!int.capacity'

--

[Issue 6333] The 'capacity' function is not pure/nothrow/@safe.

[via Digitalmars-d-bugs]

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6333

hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||safe
 CC||hst...@quickfur.ath.cx

--

[Issue 6333] The 'capacity' function is not pure/nothrow/@safe.

[d-bugmail]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6333


Rob Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||pull
 CC||sandf...@jhu.edu


--- Comment #2 from Rob Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu 2012-02-16 14:28:32 PST ---
I wrote a patch which address this for capacity and reserve. Here's pull
request:

https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/154

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 6333] The 'capacity' function is not pure/nothrow/@safe.

[d-bugmail]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6333


Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||schvei...@yahoo.com


--- Comment #1 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2011-07-18 
07:34:13 PDT ---
I don't know if capacity can be pure.  I haven't thought about the implications
of making it pure, maybe there is a way.  It seems like a reasonable property.

However, it could technically be nothrow.  However, it's technically an alias
for arr.reserve(0), and reserve could definitely throw.

I'm unsure how to deal with that.  Maybe I need to separate the runtime
function into two, one that's pure nothrow, the other which might allocate
memory.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---