https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6346
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6346
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||bootcamp
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6346
Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |D2
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6346
Orvid King blah38...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||blah38...@gmail.com
---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6346
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com ---
(In reply to Orvid King from comment #10)
Not sure, but isn't this currently an error?
No. It's perfectly legal to compare against null. null is basically the same as
[]. As far as the
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6346
--- Comment #8 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2011-07-19
05:33:14 PDT ---
Sorry for the duplicate comment, I wanted the first to be overwritten by the
second (bugzilla told me that's what would happen), but it didn't :( Ignore
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6346
--- Comment #6 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2011-07-19
05:31:19 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
In pretty much every other language that I've ever used, null is _not_ the
same
thing as empty _ever_. Someone coming from C,
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6346
--- Comment #7 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2011-07-19
05:32:02 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
In pretty much every other language that I've ever used, null is _not_ the
same
thing as empty _ever_. Someone coming from C,
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6346
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2011-07-19 11:21:49
PDT ---
Except that null and empty are _not_ the same for arrays. True, checking for
null is not as necessary in D, but you _can_ write code which relies on whether
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6346
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6346
Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6346
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2011-07-18 13:43:18
PDT ---
Well, that's why I said warning rather than error. But I would consider it bad
practice to use == null anywhere with arrays. I'm automatically go to look at
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6346
--- Comment #4 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2011-07-18
13:54:46 PDT ---
There is a flaw in your argument, however. For the coder to have meant they
want to check specifically if the pointer is null, they have to know there is
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6346
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2011-07-18 14:46:24
PDT ---
In pretty much every other language that I've ever used, null is _not_ the same
thing as empty _ever_. Someone coming from C, C++, Java etc. is going to
14 matches
Mail list logo