https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6434
Lorenzo Cogotti changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://issues.dlang.org/sh
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6434
RazvanN changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6434
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |enhancement
--- Comment #11 from Walte
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6434
SomeDude changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lovelyd...@mailmetrash.com
--- Comment #10
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6434
--- Comment #8 from Kenji Hara 2011-10-23 22:29:00 PDT ---
Reopened pull request.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/349
Points:
1. alias this lookup should be considered first.
It is the synonym of super-class.
2. If alias
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6434
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pelle.mans...@gmail.com
--- Comment #7 fr
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6434
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6434
--- Comment #4 from Gor Gyolchanyan 2011-08-16 03:55:33 PDT
---
I agree. This would make more sense. Let the opDispatch be used after alias
this.
(In reply to comment #2)
> I am not sure. opDispatch is meant to be a fallback mechanism used af
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6434
--- Comment #3 from Max Samukha 2011-08-16 03:07:32
PDT ---
On the other hand, opDispatch considered first gives much more flexibility.
Then, what to do with regular inheritance:
class A
{
int foo();
}
class B : A
{
void opDispatch(s
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6434
Max Samukha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||samu...@voliacable.com
--- Comment #2 fr
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6434
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch, rejects-valid
CC|
11 matches
Mail list logo