[Issue 6581] Yet another dtor/postblit problem?

2011-09-20 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6581 Dmitry Olshansky changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 6581] Yet another dtor/postblit problem?

2011-09-20 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6581 --- Comment #8 from Kenji Hara 2011-09-20 13:50:24 PDT --- Sorry, that was imcomplete. (In reply to comment #6) > Example: > ubyte[B.sizeof] mem=void; > emplace!B(mem.ptr);//Does this call to B's constructor call A's dtor on some > kind of tra

[Issue 6581] Yet another dtor/postblit problem?

2011-09-20 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6581 --- Comment #7 from Kenji Hara 2011-09-20 13:39:38 PDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Example: > ubyte[B.sizeof] mem=void; > emplace!B(mem.ptr);//Does this call to B's constructor call A's dtor on some > kind of trash then? void main() { u

[Issue 6581] Yet another dtor/postblit problem?

2011-09-20 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6581 --- Comment #6 from Dmitry Olshansky 2011-09-20 13:01:11 PDT --- > > I should point out that move == swap & destroy, iff left side of assigment > > _was_ initialized. A constructor may be called on chunk of uninitialized > > memory > > e.g. i

[Issue 6581] Yet another dtor/postblit problem?

2011-09-20 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6581 --- Comment #5 from Kenji Hara 2011-09-20 08:07:19 PDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > > Please note this line: > > > a = A(dummy); // a(dummy) was a typo, thought it changes nothing > > > > This is "assignment", not initializing. > > T

[Issue 6581] Yet another dtor/postblit problem?

2011-09-20 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6581 --- Comment #4 from Dmitry Olshansky 2011-09-20 07:37:10 PDT --- > Please note this line: > > a = A(dummy); // a(dummy) was a typo, thought it changes nothing > > This is "assignment", not initializing. > The assignment of an object t

[Issue 6581] Yet another dtor/postblit problem?

2011-09-20 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6581 --- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara 2011-09-20 07:07:18 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > It might be more complicated then I thought, postblits of members do work. > I'd better leave the cause of problem to thouse in the know. Another variation >

[Issue 6581] Yet another dtor/postblit problem?

2011-09-01 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6581 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry Olshansky 2011-09-01 13:58:35 PDT --- It might be more complicated then I thought, postblits of members do work. I'd better leave the cause of problem to thouse in the know. Another variation of test: import std.std

[Issue 6581] Yet another dtor/postblit problem?

2011-09-01 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6581 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry Olshansky 2011-09-01 13:21:38 PDT --- Simplifyied. My best guess is that postlblits for struct members are not called. struct A { static int cnt; this(int dummy){ cnt++; } this(this){ cnt++; } ~this(