http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6948
Summary: Possible bug in compiler or documentation regarding signature of opCmp() Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com ReportedBy: ku...@mailinator.com --- Comment #0 from ku...@mailinator.com 2011-11-14 13:07:07 PST --- The documentation http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/arrays.html writes that "For the .sort property to work on arrays of structs or unions, the struct or union definition must define the function: int opCmp(S) or int opCmp(S*)". That is misleading, as, in my experience, a struct must implement exactly "int opCmp(ref const S) const" in order to get .sort work. Signatures which are a bit different do not work. The documentation should be updated as soon as possible, either informing the programmer about a current bug in the compiler, or clearly stating that only this signature works! In addition, I think that the compiler should warn about using a likely incorrect signature. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------