http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7095
David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7095
--- Comment #2 from Heywood Floyd soul...@gmail.com 2011-12-11 10:01:25 PST
---
I understand. Thanks for the reply!
(With risk of polluting the bug tracker here, but perhaps to clarify the
workaround: Could GC.malloc/free be used as well?
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7095
--- Comment #3 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2011-12-11 10:12:27 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I understand. Thanks for the reply!
(With risk of polluting the bug tracker here, but perhaps to clarify the
workaround: Could
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7095
deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||deadal...@gmail.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7095
--- Comment #5 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2011-12-11 10:38:41 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Isn't GC has a flag that says if something may contains pointer or not ?
Why this flag is set when allocation an array of long ?
It's