[Issue 7259] Explicit annotation for method hiding

2021-01-23 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs 
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7259

mhh  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 CC||maxha...@gmail.com
 Resolution|--- |INVALID

--- Comment #3 from mhh  ---
Language change

--

[Issue 7259] Explicit annotation for method hiding

2012-01-14 Thread d-bugmail 
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7259



--- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-01-14 10:26:48 PST ---
See also:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/51y09td4%28v=vs.71%29.aspx

http://blogs.msdn.com/b/csharpfaq/archive/2004/03/12/what-s-the-difference-between-code-override-code-and-code-new-code.aspx

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 7259] Explicit annotation for method hiding

2012-01-09 Thread d-bugmail 
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7259


Alex R�nne Petersen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||xtzgzo...@gmail.com


--- Comment #1 from Alex R�nne Petersen  2012-01-09 
12:52:24 PST ---
I completely agree. If we have mandatory override, we should have this as well.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---