[Issue 790] arbitrary lookahead for nested functions
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=790 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #7 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2012-11-12 23:52:06 PST --- OK, then close as wontfix. It could also be invalid. Makes no difference. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 790] arbitrary lookahead for nested functions
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=790 Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | --- Comment #6 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2012-09-28 18:17:09 PDT --- Adding a workaround to a FAQ page doesn't in any way constitute implementing the requested enhancement. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 790] arbitrary lookahead for nested functions
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=790 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||spec Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #5 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2012-09-27 01:36:05 PDT --- This could be closed as invalid, but I'm changing to a spec bug, and marking as fixed, since the spec was changed. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 790] arbitrary lookahead for nested functions
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=790 --- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-04-14 22:37:53 PDT --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/d-programming-language.org https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/d-programming-language.org/commit/81a653a519c751973cf810a062e68ce997014a02 Explain how to forward-reference a nested function Response to forum post 2012-4-3, Nested functions should be exempt from sequential visibility rules and bug 790. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 790] arbitrary lookahead for nested functions
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=790 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||and...@metalanguage.com AssignedTo|nob...@puremagic.com|bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #2 from Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com 2010-11-26 14:11:51 PST --- I personally think this should be just closed. Symbols defined inside a functions obey sequential visibility. The decision is left to Walter. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 790] arbitrary lookahead for nested functions
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=790 nfx...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nfx...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-11-26 15:05:03 PST --- The D1 _and_ the D2 specs say about this issue: Future directions: This restriction may be removed.. Talk about one hand not knowing what the other hand is doing. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
