https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8007
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P3
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8007
--- Comment #7 from timon.g...@gmx.ch ---
(In reply to berni44 from comment #5)
> ... And as Don has IMHO
> expressed that opinion too, there is some justification in doing so.
Don merely clarified what the issue is.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8007
--- Comment #6 from timon.g...@gmx.ch ---
(In reply to berni44 from comment #5)
> ...
> If it were so "clearly not true", as you state, I should see this too. But I
> can't, so your statement is wrong.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arithmetic_shift
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8007
--- Comment #5 from berni44 ---
(In reply to timon.gehr from comment #4)
> Please stop closing issues just for the sake of it.
I do not close issues "just for the sake of it". I closed this one, because I
think it's invalid. And I wrote, why I think
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8007
timon.g...@gmx.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8007
berni44 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8007
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8007
--- Comment #2 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-05-02 10:46:16 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I guess you mean it makes you think that x 1 is
(cast(signed!(typeof(x)))x) 1
Yes, as it is phrased, -1U 1 == -1U would have to hold. The bug
