https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8121
Mathias LANG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8121
Marco Leise marco.le...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marco.le...@gmx.de
---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8121
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8121
--- Comment #7 from Marco Leise marco.le...@gmx.de ---
The meaning is very clear: This reference is not going to outlive the function
scope. The compiler implementation is lacking behind on static checks, but
that's not a reason to disallow it or for
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8121
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com ---
There has been quite a bit of debate about what it means for a reference to
something to escape a function - e.g whether returning something as scope makes
sense and counts as not escaping,
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8121
--- Comment #9 from Marco Leise marco.le...@gmx.de ---
(In reply to Jonathan M Davis from comment #8)
There has been quite a bit of debate about what it means for a reference to
something to escape a function - e.g whether returning something as
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8121
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8121
Matthias Walter xa...@xammy.info changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xa...@xammy.info
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8121
--- Comment #1 from wfunct...@hotmail.com 2012-05-19 12:29:43 PDT ---
Also, scope out (and even scope lazy) should also work, since it is
perfectly valid for both of them to say, this parameter will not be escaped.
--
Configure issuemail:
