[Issue 8268] std.datetime unittest asserts

2013-06-07 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8268 --- Comment #6 from Dmitry Olshansky 2013-06-07 15:02:59 PDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > > Well this one is no longer a problem > > Really? Cool. I was able to confirm with the preview version that it was > failing and how it was failing a

[Issue 8268] std.datetime unittest asserts

2013-06-07 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8268 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan M Davis 2013-06-07 11:22:30 PDT --- > Well this one is no longer a problem Really? Cool. I was able to confirm with the preview version that it was failing and how it was failing at a higher level, but unfortunate

[Issue 8268] std.datetime unittest asserts

2013-06-07 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8268 Dmitry Olshansky changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 8268] std.datetime unittest asserts

2012-06-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8268 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan M Davis 2012-06-30 14:51:20 PDT --- I'm going to install the Windows 8 Preview in VirtualBox and see if I can reproduce the error and track it down there, since I can get it for free, and it'll waste less of your t

[Issue 8268] std.datetime unittest asserts

2012-06-19 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8268 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry Olshansky 2012-06-19 11:16:21 PDT --- > Maybe they were idiots and changed the behavior of some API. Bleh. Well, this > will be fun to deal with given that I don't have Windows 8. It wouldn't > surprise me in the lea

[Issue 8268] std.datetime unittest asserts

2012-06-19 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8268 Jonathan M Davis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com --- Comment #1