http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8408
--- Comment #15 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-03-24 20:57:04 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/b6a809346a43c7fbf350bd4181d350dd9b2cd4
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8408
--- Comment #14 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-03-03 16:07:38 PST ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/ee06e4a38cb7e35fe046ffd4c5a938063c48dc3
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8408
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
--- Comment #13 from yeb
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8408
--- Comment #12 from yebblies 2013-01-17 01:07:31 EST ---
*** Issue 6783 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail becau
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8408
--- Comment #11 from Kenji Hara 2012-12-10 19:39:00 PST
---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > (In reply to comment #6)
> > I'm not sure that this should be allowed.
> > ...
>
> Why not? It is known at the call site that
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8408
timon.g...@gmx.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||timon.g...@gmx.ch
--- Comment #10 f
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8408
--- Comment #9 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-12-10 18:31:16 PST ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I'm not sure that this should be allowed.
> foo1 can rewrite the elements referred from arr, then it is deduced to weak
> purity. In current princ
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8408
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8408
--- Comment #8 from Kenji Hara 2012-12-06 19:33:50 PST ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Is it correct that x1 refused and x2 accepted?
>
>
> char[] foo1(int[] arr) pure {
> return new char[10];
> }
> immutable(char)[] foo2(int[] arr) pure {
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8408
--- Comment #7 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-12-06 18:07:32 PST ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Is it correct that x1 refused and x2 accepted?
I guess I have to wait or Issue 8409 to be fixed before looking for possible
troubles.
--
Configu
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8408
--- Comment #6 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-12-05 17:36:09 PST ---
Is it correct that x1 refused and x2 accepted?
char[] foo1(int[] arr) pure {
return new char[10];
}
immutable(char)[] foo2(int[] arr) pure {
return new char[10];
}
/41c52a324d0526a079039041c64afc1d3983eb58
fix Issue 8408 - Purity calculation should be improved
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/b6a809346a43c7fbf350bd4181d350dd9b2cd4e6
Merge pull request #1110 from 9rnsr/fix8408
Issue 8408 - Purity calculation should be improved
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8408
--- Comment #4 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-11-12 20:23:55 PST ---
*** Issue 9011 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving thi
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8408
--- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara 2012-09-09 07:24:46 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> This rule makes more functions (tagged as pure) become strongly pure, this is
> positive.
Thanks. But, I've been filed this as a part of issue 8409, so the p
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8408
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- Com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8408
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 2012
16 matches
Mail list logo
