http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8635
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #19
/07c714eaa6bd6d4d811f77b3dfc870038cc61bb1
fix Issue 8635 - Allow postfix expressions for new
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/commit/19227b73aac5bed6386e9ee4c12b470dc3911bad
Merge pull request #337 from 9rnsr/fix8635
Issue 8635 - Allow postfix expressions for new
--
Configure issuemail: http
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8635
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8635
Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@me.com
--- Comment
/405a549e87cce88e68367e7a3aeb358cfd38f41d
Fix issue 8635 - Allow postfix expressions for new
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/44fdd81dcd0086e551fd04c0ee9f109315755465
Merge pull request # from tgehr/master
Issue 8635 - Allow postfix expressions for new
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8635
Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8635
--- Comment #16 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-02-08 16:27:38 PST ---
An even better syntax is to allow new to act as a static method, that allows a
fully UFCS syntax:
class Foo {
void bar() {}
}
Foo().new.bar();
Foo f = Foo.new;
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8635
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8635
--- Comment #13 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2013-01-19
11:42:36 PST ---
This seems more of a why do this rather than why not ? Is C# doing it
really a compelling case?
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8635
--- Comment #14 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-01-19 12:20:48 PST ---
(In reply to comment #13)
Is C# doing it really a compelling case?
Generally C# is a well designed languages. But in this case it's not a matter
of copying C#.
In D I
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8635
--- Comment #15 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2013-01-19 18:42:48 PST ---
(In reply to comment #13)
This seems more of a why do this rather than why not ?
In my opinion it is exactly the other way round. The why not question people
actually ask.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8635
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8635
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8635
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aziz.koek...@gmail.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8635
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8635
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8635
--- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-09-09 17:49:31 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I don't know if making it work without parens is a good idea or not, since I
really don't know that the side effects of that would be.
I agree.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8635
--- Comment #4 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-09-09 18:08:59 PDT ---
There are no side effects. This just lifts a trivial restriction.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8635
Alex R�nne Petersen a...@lycus.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@lycus.org
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8635
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-09-09 18:31:47
PDT ---
I have absolutely no problem with this as long as there are no side effects. I
just had figured that there was a valid reason why the parens were required.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8635
--- Comment #7 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-09-09 18:40:01 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
I have absolutely no problem with this as long as there are no side effects. I
just had figured that there was a valid reason why the parens were
21 matches
Mail list logo
