https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=879
RazvanN changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=879
ZombineDev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||petar.p.ki...@gmail.com
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=879
--- Comment #28 from David Nadlinger ---
(In reply to Marco Leise from comment #27)
> I extended the 1x1 test matrix by a static Phobos library on one axis and
> ld.bfd on the other and found that in all 4 cases dub greets me with the
> expected "Neith
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=879
--- Comment #27 from Marco Leise ---
Shame on me, I only tested with ld.gold and shared Phobos library. I extended
the 1x1 test matrix by a static Phobos library on one axis and ld.bfd on the
other and found that in all 4 cases dub greets me with the e
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=879
--- Comment #26 from David Nadlinger ---
(In reply to Marco Leise from comment #25)
> I haven't thoroughly tested it, but at least dub works with --gc-sections
> since - I believe - dmd-2.072. So from my side this issue can be closed.
Are you sure it
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=879
--- Comment #25 from Marco Leise ---
I haven't thoroughly tested it, but at least dub works with --gc-sections since
- I believe - dmd-2.072. So from my side this issue can be closed.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=879
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com
--- Comment #24 from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=879
Marco Leise changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marco.le...@gmx.de
--- Comment #23 from Marco Le
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=879
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|D1 & D2 |D2
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=879
JR changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zor...@gmail.com
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=879
--- Comment #22 from David Nadlinger ---
(In reply to David Nadlinger from comment #21)
> There is an additional complication: ld.bfd turns __bss_start/_end into
> local symbols when passing --gc-sections. […]
LDC now uses special weak symbols, strong
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=879
David Nadlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|pull|
--- Comment #21 from David Nadlinger ---
T
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=879
--- Comment #20 from David Nadlinger ---
(In reply to Martin Nowak from comment #19)
> Actually this doesn't work with ld.gold because dmd only uses a single ctor
> per DSO (COMDAT) and ld.gold will merge the ctors before checking their
> references.
>
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=879
--- Comment #19 from Martin Nowak ---
(In reply to Martin Nowak from comment #18)
> I can also reference .minfo_beg/.minfo/.minfo_end in each ctor.
Actually this doesn't work with ld.gold because dmd only uses a single ctor per
DSO (COMDAT) and ld.gol
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=879
--- Comment #18 from Martin Nowak ---
(In reply to David Nadlinger from comment #17)
> I was under the impression that --gc-sections indeed does this when linking
> an executable. Default visibility on its own is not enough to keep a symbol
> (and thus
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=879
--- Comment #17 from David Nadlinger ---
(In reply to Martin Nowak from comment #15)
> ModuleInfos are exported global symbols, so the linker should not remove
> them.
I was under the impression that --gc-sections indeed does this when linking an
exec
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=879
--- Comment #16 from Martin Nowak ---
Another problem that I have is that ld.gold with --gc-sections doesn't copy the
.minfo_beg/.minfo_end sections from an archive object, so it breaks the section
brackets even when all .minfo* sections are pinned.
-
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=879
--- Comment #15 from Martin Nowak ---
(In reply to David Nadlinger from comment #14)
> I don't see how pinning the ModuleInfo reference from the ModuleInfo itself
> would work, as there might not be any direct references to the ModuleInfo.
> In fact,
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=879
David Nadlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@klickverbot.at
--- Comment #14 from Dav
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=879
Martin Nowak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=879
Martin Nowak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=879
--- Comment #12 from Martin Nowak ---
(In reply to Orvid King from comment #11)
> It would also be nice if a dmd equivalent of -fdata-sections and
> -ffunction-sections was supported by dmd, but the issue with that is quite
> simple; optlink.
If you b
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=879
Orvid King changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||blah38...@gmail.com
--- Comment #11 from Orvid Ki
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=879
Martin Nowak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #10 from Martin Nowak ---
OK,
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=879
--- Comment #9 from Martin Nowak ---
It should be possible to put the EH tables and ModuleInfos into section groups,
so the linker wouldn't dismiss them even though they aren't referenced
explicitly.
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19683-01/816-1386/chapter
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=879
Martin Nowak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@dawg.eu
Assignee|nob...@puremagi
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=879
--- Comment #7 from Trass3r 2013-07-23 11:28:14 CEST ---
As far as I remember the flag works fine with gdc.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=879
Trass3r changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=879
Brad Roberts changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nfx...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5 from Bra
29 matches
Mail list logo
