[Issue 9433] Deprecate delete

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9433 --- Comment #16 from Steven Schveighoffer --- *** Issue 11949 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** --

[Issue 9433] Deprecate delete

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9433 --- Comment #15 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org/commit/3421e6a9904f11302719a50c033aceb68de0bf02 Fix Issue 9433 - Deprecate delete https

[Issue 9433] Deprecate delete

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9433 --- Comment #14 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/dmd https://github.com/dlang/dmd/commit/f88ab395386b40f544c9f74ba768549c4fa9e66f Fix Issue 9433 - Deprecate delete https://github.com/dlang

[Issue 9433] Deprecate delete

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9433 github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 9433] Deprecate delete

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9433 Mike changed: What|Removed |Added CC||slavo5...@yahoo.com --- Comment

[Issue 9433] Deprecate delete

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9433 Nick Treleaven changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 9433] Deprecate delete

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9433 FG h...@fgda.pl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||h...@fgda.pl --- Comment #1 from FG

[Issue 9433] Deprecate delete

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9433 rswhi...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rswhi...@googlemail.com ---

[Issue 9433] Deprecate delete

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9433 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 9433] Deprecate delete

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9433 --- Comment #4 from rswhi...@googlemail.com 2013-01-31 08:29:13 PST --- But you have to admit: if there is new, there should be delete also. Because it is the natural opposite. Even if it is unsafe, the possibility to free even GC memory by

[Issue 9433] Deprecate delete

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9433 Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ibuc...@ubuntu.com

[Issue 9433] Deprecate delete

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9433 --- Comment #6 from rswhi...@googlemail.com 2013-01-31 08:44:46 PST --- (In reply to comment #5) (In reply to comment #4) But you have to admit: if there is new, there should be delete also. Because it is the natural opposite. That's a

[Issue 9433] Deprecate delete

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9433 --- Comment #8 from FG h...@fgda.pl 2013-01-31 08:49:18 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) Try this: [...] I see no differences if I compare this and delete, except that delete looks nicer. But I have not made a detailed test, like you did.

[Issue 9433] Deprecate delete

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9433 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2013-01-31 08:45:41 PST --- But you have to admit: if there is new, there should be delete also. Because it is the natural opposite. Except that new allocates GC memory, which is

[Issue 9433] Deprecate delete

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9433 --- Comment #9 from rswhi...@googlemail.com 2013-01-31 08:57:26 PST --- Except that new allocates GC memory, which is supposed to be managed by the GC. If you want to be managing memory yourself, you should use the tools intended for doing

[Issue 9433] Deprecate delete

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9433 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2013-01-31 09:03:21 PST --- But GC.free does not calls any DTors. That is the problem. Therefore we need something like destruct. So, you call destroy before you call GC.free. It's

[Issue 9433] Deprecate delete

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9433 --- Comment #11 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-01-31 10:10:24 PST --- (In reply to comment #7) In fact, if they were to start over, they probably wouldn't have even had new (rather they would have had a library function which did the same

[Issue 9433] Deprecate delete

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9433 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2013-01-31 18:58:15 PST --- I leave the deprecation of new to another enhancement request ;-) LOL. Yeah, well, it would break far too much code for that change at this point, so it's