Re: [Issue 2690] New: DMD aborts with MALLOC_CHECK_ set

2009-02-27 Thread Lutger
Denis Koroskin wrote: > On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:27:43 +0300, Lutger wrote: > >> Also happens in dmd 2.025 >> >> When MALLOC_CHECK_ set to 1, I get the following message: >> >> *** glibc detected *** dmd: realloc(): invalid pointer: 0x08d2c6a8 *** >> Segmentation fault >> > > Perhaps, you may wa

Re: [Issue 2690] New: DMD aborts with MALLOC_CHECK_ set

2009-02-25 Thread Denis Koroskin
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 03:24:06 +0300, Jarrett Billingsley wrote: On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Denis Koroskin <2kor...@gmail.com> wrote: On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:27:43 +0300, Lutger wrote: Also happens in dmd 2.025 When MALLOC_CHECK_ set to 1, I get the following message: *** glibc det

Re: [Issue 2690] New: DMD aborts with MALLOC_CHECK_ set

2009-02-25 Thread Jarrett Billingsley
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Denis Koroskin <2kor...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:27:43 +0300, Lutger > wrote: > >> Also happens in dmd 2.025 >> >> When MALLOC_CHECK_ set to 1, I get the following message: >> >> *** glibc detected *** dmd: realloc(): invalid pointer: 0x08d2c6a8 *

Re: [Issue 2690] New: DMD aborts with MALLOC_CHECK_ set

2009-02-25 Thread Denis Koroskin
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:27:43 +0300, Lutger wrote: Also happens in dmd 2.025 When MALLOC_CHECK_ set to 1, I get the following message: *** glibc detected *** dmd: realloc(): invalid pointer: 0x08d2c6a8 *** Segmentation fault Perhaps, you may want to post it to bugzilla, instead?

Re: [Issue 2690] New: DMD aborts with MALLOC_CHECK_ set

2009-02-25 Thread Lutger
Also happens in dmd 2.025 When MALLOC_CHECK_ set to 1, I get the following message: *** glibc detected *** dmd: realloc(): invalid pointer: 0x08d2c6a8 *** Segmentation fault