Re: Garbage collection in D

Hello Jarrett, On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Diwaker Gupta diwa...@floatingsun.net wrote: I've just started to play around with D, and I'm hoping someone can clarify this. I wrote a very simple program that just allocates lots of objects, in order to benchmark the garbage collector in D.

Re: Garbage collection in D

Robert Clipsham wrote: After porting the D version to tango: D: 6.282s (ldmd -O5 -inline -release -L-s -singleobj gctest.d) C++: 4.435s (g++ -O5 gctest.d) This is on a C2D 2.2Ghz, 2GB RAM, Linux x86-64. I don't have java installed, so can't test that. Maybe if you're planning to use the GC a

Re: Garbage collection in D

Robert Clipsham wrote: After reading TSalm's post, I reran the D version with the scope keyword at line 16: D (with scope): 1.098s D: 6.282s C++: 4.435s It seems by using scope and tango you can easily compete with C++. 'scope' eliminates dynamic memory allocation. At this point you're

number is not representable.

Recently when i try to compile something that imports std.math or tango.math.Math i get the following error: /home/mike/D/dmd2/phobos/std/math.d(1216): number is not representable std/math.d line 1216: [0x1.fa01712e8f0471ap-1064, 0x1.fa01712e8f0471ap-1, -1063], This is with both dmd

Re: Garbage collection in D

What's the difference between: D 1: 40.20 DMD D 2: 21.83 DMD D 2: 18.80 DMD, struct + scope and: D 1: 8.47 DMD D 2: 7.41 DMD + scope ...?

Re: Garbage collection in D

Robert Fraser: What's the difference between: D 1: 40.20 DMD D 2: 21.83 DMD That's the standard code. and: D 1: 8.47 DMD D 2: 7.41 DMD + scope They are both with scope, on D1 and D2. Sorry for my small omission. Bye, bearophile

Re: number is not representable.

On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 22:56:30 +0200, Mike Wey mike-...@example.com wrote: Recently when i try to compile something that imports std.math or tango.math.Math i get the following error: /home/mike/D/dmd2/phobos/std/math.d(1216): number is not representable std/math.d line 1216:

Re: Garbage collection in D

bearophile Wrote: I have tried the new JavaVM on Win, that optionally performs escape analysis, and the results are nice: Timings, N=100_000_000, Windows, seconds: D 1: 40.20 DMD D 2: 21.83 DMD D 2: 18.80 DMD, struct + scope C++: 18.06 D 1: 8.47 DMD D 2: 7.41 DMD +

Re: Garbage collection in D

Sam Hu wrote: bearophile Wrote: I have tried the new JavaVM on Win, that optionally performs escape analysis, and the results are nice: Timings, N=100_000_000, Windows, seconds: D 1: 40.20 DMD D 2: 21.83 DMD D 2: 18.80 DMD, struct + scope C++: 18.06 D 1: 8.47 DMD D 2: