On 01/26/2010 01:02 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
strtrst...@spam.com wrote in message
news:hjd6t1$be...@digitalmars.com...
This may be is a very basic question, but is there a way to let me omit a
repeating variable when doing multiple boolean operations?
if ( var == a || var == b || var == c
On 22/01/10 21:55, strtr wrote:
This may be is a very basic question, but is there a way to let me omit a
repeating variable when doing multiple boolean operations?
if ( var == a || var == b || var == c || var == d)
if ( var == (a || b || c || d) )
/**
* Untested code, it works something
Pelle MÃ¥nsson:
I think in should work for keys in an associative array and for values
in a regular array.
This is how it works in python.
opIn_r for normal arrays is something very natural. One of the very few persons
that doesn't like it is Walter. Maybe I can create a small poll to see
Pelle Månsson pelle.mans...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:hjmmod$1io...@digitalmars.com...
I think in should work for keys in an associative array and for values in
a regular array.
This is how it works in python.
Aside from that being how Python does it, why do you see that as
Hello Nick,
Pelle Månsson pelle.mans...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:hjmmod$1io...@digitalmars.com...
I think in should work for keys in an associative array and for
values in a regular array.
This is how it works in python.
Aside from that being how Python does it, why do you see that
Nick Sabalausky:
Aside from that being how Python does it, why do you see that as preferable?
Because:
1) linear searches in an array are damn common. I don't remember the results of
my benchmarks, but until your integer arrays is quite longer than 30-50 items,
performing a linear search is
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 1:21 PM, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
Nick Sabalausky:
Aside from that being how Python does it, why do you see that as preferable?
Because:
1) linear searches in an array are damn common. I don't remember the results
of my benchmarks, but until your
For the following code I get the bellow error. I'm wondering if I should be
reporting a bug, or if creating default delegates is correctly prevented?
.\defltdg.d(10): Error: delegate defltdg.__dgliteral3 is a nested function and
cannot be accessed from main
import std.stdio;
void main() {
Hello Jesse,
For the following code I get the bellow error. I'm wondering if I
should be reporting a bug, or if creating default delegates is
correctly prevented?
.\defltdg.d(10): Error: delegate defltdg.__dgliteral3 is a nested
function and cannot be accessed from main
import std.stdio;
bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote in message
news:hjnmdl$166...@digitalmars.com...
Nick Sabalausky:
Aside from that being how Python does it, why do you see that as
preferable?
Because:
1) linear searches in an array are damn common. I don't remember the
results of my benchmarks,
Nick Sabalausky:
I don't see how any of that argues against the idea of making in always
operate on the elements and having a different method for checking the keys.
I have already done my best with those words, so... :-)
AA elements are its keys, that are a set. In Python3 if you have a dict
I was looking at the std.signals code in svn to find out how the magic
of the observer class not needing to inherit anything was done and I was
somewhat disappointed to see rt_attachDisposeEvent. Is this function
standardised or exposed anywhere? I can think of cases where being able
to listen
BCS wrote:
Hello Jesse,
For the following code I get the bellow error. I'm wondering if I
should be reporting a bug, or if creating default delegates is
correctly prevented?
.\defltdg.d(10): Error: delegate defltdg.__dgliteral3 is a nested
function and cannot be accessed from main
Bill Baxter wbax...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.34.1264542189.4461.digitalmars-d-le...@puremagic.com...
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 1:21 PM, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com
wrote:
Nick Sabalausky:
Aside from that being how Python does it, why do you see that as
preferable?
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote:
Bill Baxter wbax...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.34.1264542189.4461.digitalmars-d-le...@puremagic.com...
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 1:21 PM, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com
wrote:
Nick Sabalausky:
Aside from that being
15 matches
Mail list logo
