Some general replies:
There have been three responses along the lines of are you sure OPTLINK
is running?. Quoting myself:
Invoking OPTLINK directly changes nothing.
Or to be more specific:
link AstTest,AstTest,,user32+kernel32/noi+tango.lib;
(zero-byte .map file pops into existence)
Yes,
On Wed, 12 May 2010 18:54:20 -0400, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com
wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer:
class ArrayList(V)
{
V take() {...}
unittest
{
auto al = new ArrayList!uint;
...
That unit test is the test of just take().
[snip]
I don't have other ideas for you.
Nrgyzer Wrote:
torhu Wrote:
On 06.05.2010 16:06, Nrgyzer wrote:
Thanks, but doesn't work :(
My files contain:
mydll.d:
module mydll;
export extern int i;
mydll2.d:
module mydll;
export int i = 7;
test.d:
import mydll;
import std.stdio;
On 13.05.2010 18:23, Nrgyzer wrote:
Nrgyzer Wrote:
dmd now exports all values successfully. But when I try to export a class, I
get the following errors:
Error 42: Symbol Undefined _D5mydll1t7__ClassZ
Error 42: Symbol Undefined _D5mydll1t5_ctorMFZC11mydll1t
Source of mydll.d is:
export class
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Keep wrote:
Well, except for this:
_D11TokenStream808d8d5_ctorMFC6Sourcef6P809091
DFS8Location808989AaYvJS68085cfs5f4Zb80
99aaZC819a87
(broken across 3 lines; xx are bytes in hex since several of them were
non-printable.)
As
On 13.05.2010 10:39, Daniel Keep wrote:
Attached both regular and decaffeinated^Hgutted versions.
Most likely DMD turns VisitorCtfe.d into an invalid object file. But
since you don't need to link with objects that contain only ctfe
functions...
Here's what I get:
--
Seems I've got an older version of optlink, 8.00.1. With 8.00.2 I get
the same behavior you did, but it still works if you don't link with
VisitorCtfe.obj.
When running 8.00.2 in the msvc debugger, it just looks like optlink
successfully exits. No crash or anything. But no useful output
Don Wrote:
strtr wrote:
Killed it again :(
Are you using the latest DMD?
I was/am using 1.060
If so, please try to create a test case,
as this bug has never been reported before. Thanks!
Had to put some time into actual coding..
but I just tried to create a test case:
Removed the few
