On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:35:50 +0100, spir wrote:
On 02/02/2011 04:20 PM, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 15:55:53 +0100, spir wrote:
Hello,
What are the default semantics for '==' on structs?
I ask this because I was forced to write opEquals on a struct to get
expected
On 2011-02-03 07:21, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday 02 February 2011 21:26:00 Mandeep Singh Brar wrote:
Hi,
Is there a method to access this reference of the container class
from an inner class. i.e.
class A {
class B {
methodM() {
callAnotherM(A::this or A.this);
}
}
}
On Thursday 03 February 2011 00:38:08 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-02-03 07:21, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday 02 February 2011 21:26:00 Mandeep Singh Brar wrote:
Hi,
Is there a method to access this reference of the container class
from an inner class. i.e.
class A {
class
On 02/03/2011 09:09 AM, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:35:50 +0100, spir wrote:
On 02/02/2011 04:20 PM, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 15:55:53 +0100, spir wrote:
Hello,
What are the default semantics for '==' on structs?
I ask this because I was forced
On 02/03/2011 08:41 AM, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 18:38:02 +0100, spir wrote:
I guess the only solution would be for the compiler to support a kind of
reange type syntax?
I'm not sure I understand what you mean here. Perhaps you're looking for
something like concepts,
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 13:05:00 +0100, spir wrote:
On 02/03/2011 08:41 AM, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 18:38:02 +0100, spir wrote:
I guess the only solution would be for the compiler to support a kind
of reange type syntax?
I'm not sure I understand what you mean here.
I'm using std.regex from Phobos 2, which I heard was relatively new. My
regex is supposed to match a time to start playback in a game replay's
file name (usually user-written). It's very adaptive and works
perfectly on http://regextester.com but doesn't match properly with Phobos.
I wrote a
On 02/03/2011 01:17 PM, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Why the reluctance to use template constraints? They're so flexible! :)
I cannot stand the is() idiom/syntax ;-) Dunno why. Would happily get rid of
it in favor of type-classes (built eg as an extension to current interfaces).
For instance,
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 05:11:34 -0500, Nrgyzer nrgy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey guys,
I have an associative array like this: T[hash_t] myArray; (T means
the template type).
Is there any chance to cast/convert this array to an indexed array or
is it possible to iterate over specific indices? I know
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 13:53:44 +0100, spir wrote:
On 02/03/2011 01:17 PM, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Why the reluctance to use template constraints? They're so flexible!
:)
I cannot stand the is() idiom/syntax ;-) Dunno why. Would happily get
rid of it in favor of type-classes (built eg as
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 11:35:50 -0500, spir denis.s...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/02/2011 04:20 PM, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
I think the compiler does a bitwise comparison in this case, meaning
that
it compares the arrays' pointers instead of their data. Related bug
report:
Thank you, Lars.
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 03:43:43 -0500, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On Thursday 03 February 2011 00:38:08 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-02-03 07:21, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday 02 February 2011 21:26:00 Mandeep Singh Brar wrote:
Hi,
Is there a method to access this
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:08:33 +, Janusch wrote:
Hello!
I'm trying to convert ANSI characters to UTF8 that but it doesn't work
correctly.
I used the following:
void main() {
writeln(convertToUTF8(ä));
}
string convertToUTF8(string text) {
string result;
I figured something out, at least. I had forgotten to use backslashes
before the hyphens in the [...]s. That makes the matches link together
as expected, but it still doesn't make s(ec(ond)?)? match sec like
it should. It just matches s.
For example, with std.regex, the following regex
== Auszug aus bearophile (bearophileh...@lycos.com)'s Artikel
Nrgyzer:
Is there any chance to cast/convert this array to an indexed
array or
is it possible to iterate over specific indices? I know that
there is
something like next() for the foreach-statement but when the array
contains
I figured out the bug. Inside a set of square brackets, \s doesn't
match whitespace. It matches s instead. I'm uncertain exactly how the
ECMA-262 part 15.10 regular expression specification is meant to handle
that situation.
03.02.2011 18:03, Alex Folland пишет:
I figured out the bug. Inside a set of square brackets, \s doesn't
match whitespace. It matches s instead. I'm uncertain exactly how the
ECMA-262 part 15.10 regular expression specification is meant to
handle that situation.
It does match for me:
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 09:35:44 -0500, Nrgyzer nrgy...@gmail.com wrote:
== Auszug aus bearophile (bearophileh...@lycos.com)'s Artikel
Nrgyzer:
Is there any chance to cast/convert this array to an indexed
array or
is it possible to iterate over specific indices? I know that
there is
== Auszug aus Steven Schveighoffer (schvei...@yahoo.com)'s Artikel
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 09:35:44 -0500, Nrgyzer nrgy...@gmail.com
wrote:
== Auszug aus bearophile (bearophileh...@lycos.com)'s Artikel
Nrgyzer:
Is there any chance to cast/convert this array to an indexed
array or
is it
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 10:41:16 -0500, Nrgyzer nrgy...@gmail.com wrote:
== Auszug aus Steven Schveighoffer (schvei...@yahoo.com)'s Artikel
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 09:35:44 -0500, Nrgyzer nrgy...@gmail.com
wrote:
== Auszug aus bearophile (bearophileh...@lycos.com)'s Artikel
Nrgyzer:
Is there any
On 2011-02-03 10:21, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
03.02.2011 18:03, Alex Folland пишет:
I figured out the bug. Inside a set of square brackets, \s doesn't
match whitespace. It matches s instead. I'm uncertain exactly how the
ECMA-262 part 15.10 regular expression specification is meant to
handle
== Auszug aus Steven Schveighoffer (schvei...@yahoo.com)'s Artikel
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 10:41:16 -0500, Nrgyzer nrgy...@gmail.com wrote:
== Auszug aus Steven Schveighoffer (schvei...@yahoo.com)'s Artikel
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 09:35:44 -0500, Nrgyzer nrgy...@gmail.com
wrote:
== Auszug aus
03.02.2011 19:34, Nrgyzer пишет:
== Auszug aus Steven Schveighoffer (schvei...@yahoo.com)'s Artikel
This only works if you rarely remove elements (removal in an
array is an O(n) operation).
-Steve
I already thought about using an dynamic array like T[] (which contains all
elements that should
03.02.2011 19:08, Alex Folland пишет:
On 2011-02-03 10:21, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
03.02.2011 18:03, Alex Folland пишет:
I figured out the bug. Inside a set of square brackets, \s doesn't
match whitespace. It matches s instead. I'm uncertain exactly how the
ECMA-262 part 15.10 regular
== Auszug aus Stanislav Blinov (bli...@loniir.ru)'s Artikel
03.02.2011 19:34, Nrgyzer пишет:
== Auszug aus Steven Schveighoffer (schvei...@yahoo.com)'s Artikel
This only works if you rarely remove elements (removal in an
array is an O(n) operation).
-Steve
I already thought about using
On 02/03/2011 04:29 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Again, I'm not sure what the point is of starting in the middle of the array.
Are you expecting something different from a hashtable?
Maybe what he needs is a plain Lisp-like symbol table (in D, an array of (key
value) pairs)?
Denis
--
On 02/03/2011 04:41 PM, Nrgyzer wrote:
== Auszug aus Steven Schveighoffer (schvei...@yahoo.com)'s Artikel
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 09:35:44 -0500, Nrgyzernrgy...@gmail.com
wrote:
== Auszug aus bearophile (bearophileh...@lycos.com)'s Artikel
Nrgyzer:
Is there any chance to cast/convert this array
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 12:52:28 -0500, spir denis.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Side-questions: is it written somewhere dmd interns string literals? If
yes, where? Is this supposed to be part of D's spec or an implementation
aspect of dmd?
String literals are immutable, which means the compiler is
On 02/03/2011 02:25 PM, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 13:53:44 +0100, spir wrote:
On 02/03/2011 01:17 PM, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Why the reluctance to use template constraints? They're so flexible!
:)
I cannot stand the is() idiom/syntax ;-) Dunno why. Would happily
On 2/3/11 10:29 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 03:43:43 -0500, Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
On Thursday 03 February 2011 00:38:08 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-02-03 07:21, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday 02 February 2011 21:26:00 Mandeep Singh Brar
On Thursday, February 03, 2011 10:36:29 Ary Manzana wrote:
On 2/3/11 10:29 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 03:43:43 -0500, Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
On Thursday 03 February 2011 00:38:08 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-02-03 07:21, Jonathan M Davis
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 13:53:22 -0500, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On Thursday, February 03, 2011 10:36:29 Ary Manzana wrote:
On 2/3/11 10:29 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I have noticed that, is that a bug? I always thought it strange, since
outer is a keyword, that you
On 02/03/2011 07:00 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 12:52:28 -0500, spir denis.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Side-questions: is it written somewhere dmd interns string literals? If yes,
where? Is this supposed to be part of D's spec or an implementation aspect of
dmd?
String
On 02/03/2011 08:01 PM, Nrgyzer wrote:
== Auszug aus Stanislav Blinov (bli...@loniir.ru)'s Artikel
03.02.2011 19:34, Nrgyzer пишет:
== Auszug aus Steven Schveighoffer (schvei...@yahoo.com)'s Artikel
This only works if you rarely remove elements (removal in an
array is an O(n) operation).
Alex Folland Wrote:
The problematic string:
Guaton_at_9min59sec.WAgame
Might I suggest using a simpler regex? It gives the ability to do better error
checking/reporting. Instead of adding all the misspellings for minute and
second, just capture those locations as words and analyze them
On 02/04/2011 01:19 AM, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
On 02/04/2011 12:48 AM, bearophile wrote:
Stanislav Blinov:
Nrgyzer:
Ah, okay... I already tried some things with [0..i] ~ [i + 1..$] but
there was always an error and I thought, it must be done more simply.
There is no possible simplier way
36 matches
Mail list logo
