On 2011-02-26 17:06, Mike Wey wrote:
On 02/26/2011 11:49 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-02-26 01:28, simendsjo wrote:
C is not my strong side, so I'm having some problems wrapping some code.
I found a couple of sources on this:
1) http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/htomodule.html
2)
On 2011-02-26 19:49, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 26.02.2011 19:52, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-02-26 12:29, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 26.02.2011 14:10, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I'm trying to use the std.regex module but when I run my application I
get an exception. The exception message says:
On 2011-02-26 17:58, simendsjo wrote:
On 26.02.2011 17:06, Mike Wey wrote:
On 02/26/2011 11:49 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-02-26 01:28, simendsjo wrote:
C is not my strong side, so I'm having some problems wrapping some
code.
I found a couple of sources on this:
1)
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 19:46:18 -0500, Tyro[a.c.edwards] nos...@home.com
wrote:
On 2/27/2011 8:52 AM, Simen kjaeraas wrote:
Tyro[a.c.edwards] nos...@home.com wrote:
I'm trying to convert some c++ code that defines
T func(par...)
{
Controller * pCtrl = WinGetLongController * (hwnd);
.
.
.
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 22:24:52 -0500, Bekenn leav...@alone.com wrote:
On 2/25/2011 7:24 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
BTW, I think long long is a gnu extension, it's not standard C (I don't
think long long exists in Visual C for instance).
I'm pretty sure it's standard as of C99 (though not
On 27.02.2011 11:43, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-02-26 17:58, simendsjo wrote:
On 26.02.2011 17:06, Mike Wey wrote:
On 02/26/2011 11:49 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-02-26 01:28, simendsjo wrote:
C is not my strong side, so I'm having some problems wrapping some
code.
I found a couple
On Sunday 27 February 2011 05:41:49 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 22:24:52 -0500, Bekenn leav...@alone.com wrote:
On 2/25/2011 7:24 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
BTW, I think long long is a gnu extension, it's not standard C (I don't
think long long exists in Visual C
I'm having some problems grokking version.
How would I translate this simple C macro?
#if !defined(IDENT) || !defined(IDENT2)
I've tried the following:
version(!IDENT)
identifier or integer expected, not !
!version(IDENT)
Declaration expected, not '!'
version(IDENT || IDENT2)
found '||'
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 09:52:01 -0500, simendsjo simen.end...@pandavre.com
wrote:
I'm having some problems grokking version.
How would I translate this simple C macro?
#if !defined(IDENT) || !defined(IDENT2)
I've tried the following:
version(!IDENT)
identifier or integer expected, not !
On 2/27/11 3:52 PM, simendsjo wrote:
I'm having some problems grokking version.
How would I translate this simple C macro?
#if !defined(IDENT) || !defined(IDENT2)
You are facing a quite common question, with the answer being that there
is no simpler way to do this, at least that I know of.
On 2/27/11 4:14 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
But here is essentially the way to do your thingy.
version(IDENT)
{
}
else version(IDENT2)
{
}
else
{
version=NOT_IDENT_OR_IDENT2;
}
version(NOT_IDENT_OR_IDENT2)
{
...
}
Wouldn't that be »!(IDENT || IDENT2)«, as opposed to »!IDENT || !IDENT2«?
On 27.02.2011 16:18, David Nadlinger wrote:
On 2/27/11 3:52 PM, simendsjo wrote:
I'm having some problems grokking version.
How would I translate this simple C macro?
#if !defined(IDENT) || !defined(IDENT2)
You are facing a quite common question, with the answer being that there
is no
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 15:52:01 +0100, simendsjo wrote:
I'm having some problems grokking version.
How would I translate this simple C macro? #if !defined(IDENT) ||
!defined(IDENT2)
I've tried the following:
version(!IDENT)
identifier or integer expected, not !
!version(IDENT)
On 27.02.2011 17:27, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 15:52:01 +0100, simendsjo wrote:
I'm having some problems grokking version.
How would I translate this simple C macro? #if !defined(IDENT) ||
!defined(IDENT2)
I've tried the following:
version(!IDENT)
identifier or
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 10:20:46 -0500, David Nadlinger s...@klickverbot.at
wrote:
On 2/27/11 4:14 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
But here is essentially the way to do your thingy.
version(IDENT)
{
}
else version(IDENT2)
{
}
else
{
version=NOT_IDENT_OR_IDENT2;
}
version(NOT_IDENT_OR_IDENT2)
{
Hi,
Is there anything in the standard library to do named pipes IPC in
both windows and linux ? I am not necessarily looking for a unified
API, anything that will allow me to setup named pipes on either OS and
read/write on them will do.
Thanks,
Tarun
I'd like to define a type Ordinal which behaves like an int (using a struct or
alias) that represents the 26 letters, A-Z, with the numbers 1-26. Then, I
would like to be able to coerce between chars and Ordinals appropriately.
chars and ints already have the ability to coerce between each other
Tarun Ramakrishna wrote:
Hi,
Is there anything in the standard library to do named pipes IPC in
both windows and linux ? I am not necessarily looking for a unified
API, anything that will allow me to setup named pipes on either OS and
read/write on them will do.
Thanks,
Tarun
I'm not sure but I
Hi Johannes,
Thanks! I located mkfifo in 'core.sys.posix.sys.stat'. I couldn't find
anything for named pipes in the standard library, but there is a
Windows API project in dsource and the module 'win32.winbase' has
declarations for 'CreateNamedPipe', etc. I guess this will do.
Best Regards,
On Sunday 27 February 2011 07:18:29 David Nadlinger wrote:
On 2/27/11 3:52 PM, simendsjo wrote:
I'm having some problems grokking version.
How would I translate this simple C macro?
#if !defined(IDENT) || !defined(IDENT2)
You are facing a quite common question, with the answer being
On 2/27/2011 12:10 PM, Peter Lundgren wrote:
I'd like to define a type Ordinal which behaves like an int (using a struct or
alias) that represents the 26 letters, A-Z, with the numbers 1-26. Then, I
would like to be able to coerce between chars and Ordinals appropriately.
chars and ints already
Thanks, Chapman :-), I followed your instructions and they worked.
On Sunday 27 February 2011 12:10:43 Peter Lundgren wrote:
I'd like to define a type Ordinal which behaves like an int (using a struct
or alias) that represents the 26 letters, A-Z, with the numbers 1-26.
Then, I would like to be able to coerce between chars and Ordinals
appropriately.
chars
I got it working with the DAllegro (Allegro 4.2) game library as well!
Peter Lundgren lundg...@rose-hulman.edu wrote:
I'd like to define a type Ordinal which behaves like an int (using a
struct or
alias) that represents the 26 letters, A-Z, with the numbers 1-26. Then,
I
would like to be able to coerce between chars and Ordinals appropriately.
chars and ints
On Sunday 27 February 2011 21:57:26 Simen kjaeraas wrote:
Peter Lundgren lundg...@rose-hulman.edu wrote:
I'd like to define a type Ordinal which behaves like an int (using a
struct or
alias) that represents the 26 letters, A-Z, with the numbers 1-26. Then,
I
would like to be able to
Hi,
Do we have a ini parser in D somewhere ? If not, is there some
documentation anywhere that tells one how to wrap a simple C++ library
like simple ini ? (Of course it isn't difficult to build a quick
parser, just that someone would done this already)
Thanks,
Tarun
On 2/27/2011 11:04 PM, Tarun Ramakrishna wrote:
Hi,
Do we have a ini parser in D somewhere ? If not, is there some
documentation anywhere that tells one how to wrap a simple C++ library
like simple ini ? (Of course it isn't difficult to build a quick
parser, just that someone would done this
Thanks Bekenn!
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Bekenn leav...@alone.com wrote:
On 2/27/2011 11:04 PM, Tarun Ramakrishna wrote:
Hi,
Do we have a ini parser in D somewhere ? If not, is there some
documentation anywhere that tells one how to wrap a simple C++ library
like simple ini ? (Of
29 matches
Mail list logo
