I reported the error to the author. Thanks guys!
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 3:34 AM, spir denis.s...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/03/2011 09:38 AM, Jesus Alvarez wrote:
I got it to compile adding std.regex to split to make it:
auto words = std.regex.split (sentence, regex([ \t,.;:?]+));
So now my
But there is a difference in how they behave, and I have no way of checking
this behavior.
Consider the following little snippet:
void f(int[] a) {
a[0] = -1;
}
void main() {
int[] a = [1,2,3];
static assert(is(typeof(a) == int[]));
f(a);
assert(a[0] == -1); // a passed by
On 2011-04-04 01:16, simendsjo wrote:
But there is a difference in how they behave, and I have no way of checking
this behavior. Consider the following little snippet:
void f(int[] a) {
a[0] = -1;
}
void main() {
int[] a = [1,2,3];
static assert(is(typeof(a) == int[]));
What use case do you have for wanting to know whether a variable is an enum
or not?
The same reason I'd like to check if it's const/immutable; if an algorithm
requires a
modifiable array.
void sortInPlace(int[] array) {
array.sort;
}
void main() {
int[] a = [3,2,1];
On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 10:45:51 -0400, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com
wrote:
simendsjo:
http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/arrays.html says static arrays are
limited to 16mb, but I can only allocate 1mb.
My fault, or bug?
It accepts 4_000_000 ints, but not (16 * 1024 * 1024) / int.sizeof =
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 08:29:47 -0400, simendsjo simen.end...@pandavre.com
wrote:
D will copy the original content if a slice expands, but is the
following behavior
implementation specific, or part of the specification?
auto a = [0,1,2];
auto b = a[0..2];
a.length = 2;
On 04/03/2011 07:31 AM, Tarun Ramakrishna wrote:
Hi,
Apparently std.process.exec (D2.052/windows) doesn't work the way the
documentation describes. It terminates the parent process. Is there a
way to keep the parent process open in D ? I also vaguely remember
seeing some mails on this list
On 04/03/2011 05:06 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On 2011-04-03 04:10, simendsjo wrote:
int[] a = [1,2,3];
int[4] b;
assert(b == [0,0,0,0]);
b = a[] * 3; // oops... a[] * 3 takes element outside a's bounds
assert(b[$-1] == 0); // fails.. last element is
Steven Schveighoffer:
That would be 16 MiB.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mebibyte
Then I think 16 MiB are more useful than 16_000_000 bytes.
Bye,
bearophile
On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 12:43:03 -0400, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com
wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer:
That would be 16 MiB.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mebibyte
Then I think 16 MiB are more useful than 16_000_000 bytes.
Seems arbitrary to me. I'm sure some people feel 32MB would be
Hi Kai,
Thanks. Yes, I came to realize that myself. Since I didn't see a fork
in std.process, I assumed it was different from the POSIX semantics.
Thanks,
Tarun
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Kai Meyer k...@unixlords.com wrote:
On 04/03/2011 07:31 AM, Tarun Ramakrishna wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:30:34 -0400, simendsjo simen.end...@pandavre.com
wrote:
On 04.04.2011 15:53, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
2. The D GC collects entire memory blocks, not portions of them. There
is no way for the GC to collect a[3]. It can only collect the entire
memory block which
On 2011-04-04 16:17, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
I think I'd need a toWStringz function, or maybe toStringz can be made more
clever and figure out that I'm passing a wstring and return a
null-terminated wchar*.
Currently I'm using wstrings and appending the null terminator by hand,
e.g.:
On 4/5/11, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
Not to mention, in the case above, a null
character should automatically be appended onto the end of the string, since
it's as string literal.
I've always found this confusing. So If I have this char array:
char[] foostring = foo.dup;
On 2011-04-04 16:44, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 4/5/11, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
Not to mention, in the case above, a null
character should automatically be appended onto the end of the string,
since it's as string literal.
I've always found this confusing. So If I have
Ok that makes sense. Thank you.
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 02:32:35 +0200, Aleksandar Ružičić
ruzicic.aleksan...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it possible to use opDispatch as generic getter and setter at the
same time? Something like __get() and __set() in PHP..
this is what I've tried: https://gist.github.com/895571
and I get Error:
17 matches
Mail list logo
