thanks for your answer. If it is that complicated if I prefer explicit
specialization, I think. But I do not quite understand that it is not
possible to achieve this with a simple is expression (without a
function like isAnA and using __traits) as the D language reference
includes a very
On 4/5/11, Kagamin s...@here.lot wrote:
toUTF16z
it was in windows examples somewhere, I suppose.
Great, it's in std.utf. Thanks!
I get a untitled.d(32): Error: template instance ElementType!(listR) does not
match template declaration ElementType(R) error.
What could be the problem ?
--
import std.stdio;
import std.range;
import std.container;
What's strange is that
auto r3 = r1 + r2;
works. Bug indeed...
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 15:24:46 -0400, simendsjo simen.end...@pandavre.com
wrote:
I don't know if this is an actual problem, but I don't understand the
behavior.
When one slice calls assumeSafeAppend, both slices is given control,
that is, gets the parents capacity.
You have to stop thinking of
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 15:48:36 -0400, Caligo iteronve...@gmail.com wrote:
I searched the bugzilla and there are 'alias this' related bugs. Some
of them are 2 years old and have not been fixed.
There are many bugs in that category. inout I think is a prime example.
I don't really know what to
I'm reading documentation on std.datetime, and it appears there are
added features that I don't have in 2.51 (Linux). Did features like
'SysTime' get added after 2.51?
Does anybody have a one-liner to convert a time_t to a date string that
should work for me?
-Kai Meyer
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:24:11 -0400, Kai Meyer k...@unixlords.com wrote:
I'm reading documentation on std.datetime, and it appears there are
added features that I don't have in 2.51 (Linux). Did features like
'SysTime' get added after 2.51?
Does anybody have a one-liner to convert a time_t
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:40:12 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:24:11 -0400, Kai Meyer k...@unixlords.com wrote:
I'm reading documentation on std.datetime, and it appears there are
added features that I don't have in 2.51 (Linux). Did features
I'm reading documentation on std.datetime, and it appears there are
added features that I don't have in 2.51 (Linux). Did features like
'SysTime' get added after 2.51?
Does anybody have a one-liner to convert a time_t to a date string that
should work for me?
std.datetime was completely
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:24:11 -0400, Kai Meyer k...@unixlords.com wrote:
I'm reading documentation on std.datetime, and it appears there are
added features that I don't have in 2.51 (Linux). Did features like
'SysTime' get added after 2.51?
Does anybody have a one-liner to convert a
On 04/05/2011 03:40 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:24:11 -0400, Kai Meyer k...@unixlords.com wrote:
I'm reading documentation on std.datetime, and it appears there are
added features that I don't have in 2.51 (Linux). Did features like
'SysTime' get added after 2.51?
On 04/05/2011 03:59 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
I'm reading documentation on std.datetime, and it appears there are
added features that I don't have in 2.51 (Linux). Did features like
'SysTime' get added after 2.51?
Does anybody have a one-liner to convert a time_t to a date string
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 18:20:02 -0400, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
toSimpleString (which toString calls) does give the short version of the
month
in it, but during the review process, a number of the folks reviewing
it were
against putting code in there relating to printing
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 18:20:02 -0400, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
toSimpleString (which toString calls) does give the short version of the
month
in it, but during the review process, a number of the folks reviewing
it were
against putting code in there relating to
It's just frustrating, that's all. Writing thousands of lines of code
and having everything stop because of a compiler bug is just
frustrating.
I know progress is being made, and all that is appreciated. But, I
don't remember ever hearing anything about D2 being in beta. If
anything, I
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 19:37:15 -0400, Caligo iteronve...@gmail.com wrote:
It's just frustrating, that's all. Writing thousands of lines of code
and having everything stop because of a compiler bug is just
frustrating.
I completely understand. It's why I have to periodically stop using D.
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 19:37:15 -0400, Caligo iteronve...@gmail.com wrote:
It's just frustrating, that's all. Writing thousands of lines of code
and having everything stop because of a compiler bug is just
frustrating.
I completely understand. It's why I have to periodically stop using D.
E.g. this code:
class Foo
{
int wndProc(uint msg, int wParam, int lParam) { return 0; }
}
class Bar : Foo
{
override int wndProc(uint msg, int wParam, int lParam)
{
switch(msg)
{
case 1:
return 1;
default:
19 matches
Mail list logo
