On 2011-05-12 16:45, Adam Ruppe wrote:
Could you share how or show an URL that provide sample code to do
that in D?
Check out my D api demo:
http://arsdnet.net/cgi-bin/apidemo/
Here's the source code (about 50 lines of D)
http://arsdnet.net/apidemo.d
And the HTML templates it uses:
On 13.05.2011 00:59, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Still, I wouldn't have though that dashes would have been a big enough deal
to really care.
I didn't say that this is a big deal, just inconvenience.
There are many minor things which are not a big deal, but make life a bit
less convenient -
Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote in message
news:iqilmh$7tk$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 2011-05-12 16:45, Adam Ruppe wrote:
Could you share how or show an URL that provide sample code to do
that in D?
Check out my D api demo:
http://arsdnet.net/cgi-bin/apidemo/
Here's the source code
I wonder a bit why you want one file per object? Is it to avoid unnecessary
imports? Make finding object definitions easier? Or a style preference? I think
replies by others covered all but the first question. I use the import
std.foo: bar, baz; syntax for that.
Generally speaking, separating
On 13/05/2011 08:09, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-05-12 16:45, Adam Ruppe wrote:
Could you share how or show an URL that provide sample code to do
that in D?
Check out my D api demo:
http://arsdnet.net/cgi-bin/apidemo/
Here's the source code (about 50 lines of D)
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
How is it working out with a static type system, compared to a
dynamic, for web development?
It's *much* better, especially for rapid development. The compiler
will tell me if my changes anywhere break things anywhere else,
so I can modify with confidence.
I can't tell
I was about to write a bug report on this, but I am not sure what's happening
here, probably I am missing something. I am not even sure this is a bug, so
it's better to ask here first. This crashes at runtime with no stack trace (DMD
2.053beta, I'd like betas to be numbered in any way):
Jason House jason.james.ho...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:iqjamt$1e5b$1...@digitalmars.com...
I wonder a bit why you want one file per object? Is it to avoid unnecessary
imports? Make finding object definitions easier? Or a style preference? I
think replies by others covered all but the
Adam D. Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:iqji6m$1se1$1...@digitalmars.com...
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
How is it working out with a static type system, compared to a
dynamic, for web development?
It's *much* better, especially for rapid development. The compiler
will tell
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Be glad it's not VB6, or worse, VBScript.
Oh, I know it! One of my side jobs I picked up this year is
maintaining somd old VBS program, using classic ASP.
There's so much nonsense. It doesn't help that the original author
was horribly incompetent - he never used
I have a question,
can I write all functions like this object.function() instead of
functin(object) ?
or that form for some function or cases.
I have a question,
can I write all functions like this object.function() instead of
functin(object) ?
or that form for some function or cases.
This currently only works for D arrays. (I think WalterAndrei wanted it for
other
types too originally, I do not know if it will be implemented.)
I have a question,
can I write all functions like this object.function() instead of
functin(object) ? or that form for some function or cases.
This currently only works for D arrays. (I think WalterAndrei wanted it
for other types too originally, I do not know if it will be implemented.)
So I'm writing the official PHP library to access my work library.
Just spent 20 minutes trying to figure out why it wasn't working
right.
The problem was ultimately here:
$rurl .= ? + $this-getArgString();
See the mistake? Neither did the stupid PHP interpreter. I hate it
so
14 matches
Mail list logo
