RenatoL wrote:
##[3] arr = [0, aa, 2.4];
What can i put instead of ##?
In C#, just for example, i can write:
object[] ar1 = new object[3];
ar1[0] = 1;
ar1[1] = hello;
ar1[2] = 'a';
and it works. But in D
Object[3] arr0 = [0, aa, 2.4];
and compiler complains
In D, the
On Wednesday, November 16, 2011 08:33:04 Dejan Lekic wrote:
RenatoL wrote:
##[3] arr = [0, aa, 2.4];
What can i put instead of ##?
In C#, just for example, i can write:
object[] ar1 = new object[3];
ar1[0] = 1;
ar1[1] = hello;
ar1[2] = 'a';
and it works. But in D
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:45:02 -0500, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 11/15/2011 04:53 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Yes, but this is spelled out because copying a static array requires
moving data. However, this does *not* require a hidden allocation (even
though it does do a hidden
On 11/16/2011 02:22 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:45:02 -0500, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 11/15/2011 04:53 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Yes, but this is spelled out because copying a static array requires
moving data. However, this does *not* require
On 11/16/2011 08:26 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
auto a = [new Foo, new Bar, new Qux]; // I want that to work.
(It currently does, if that was unclear)
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:26:57 -0500, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 11/16/2011 02:22 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:45:02 -0500, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch
wrote:
Note that this is an explicit allocation:
int[] a = [1,2,3]; // just as explicit as a
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:00:16 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
The one case which is difficult to do is initializing a fixed-size array
with a literal that uses runtime data. I suppose we'd need a function
that returns a fixed-sized array made of its arguments, and
On 11/16/2011 09:00 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:26:57 -0500, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 11/16/2011 02:22 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:45:02 -0500, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch
wrote:
Note that this is an explicit allocation:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 21:00:16 +0100, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:26:57 -0500, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 11/16/2011 02:22 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:45:02 -0500, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch
wrote:
Note
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:47:58 -0500, Simen Kjærås simen.kja...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 21:00:16 +0100, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:26:57 -0500, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch
wrote:
On 11/16/2011 02:22 PM, Steven Schveighoffer
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:16:48 -0500, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 11/16/2011 09:00 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:26:57 -0500, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch
wrote:
On 11/16/2011 02:22 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:45:02 -0500, Timon
On 11/16/2011 10:56 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:16:48 -0500, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 11/16/2011 09:00 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:26:57 -0500, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch
wrote:
On 11/16/2011 02:22 PM, Steven
On 11/16/2011 11:39 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
I think this is a better solution:
void foo2(T: ParameterTypeTuple!foo[0])(T t){foo(t);}
Then it is just a matter of applying proper value range propagation for
IFTY:
void bar(T: short)(T t){...}
void main(){
bar(1); // ok
}
BTW, this already
13 matches
Mail list logo
