Stewart Gordon:
> You mean all programming languages should support CTFE for argument
> validation?
This is not necessary, and it's not sufficient...
> What if the format string isn't even known at compile time in the first place?
In this case the format string validation is done at run-time.
On 02/12/2011 03:19, bearophile wrote:
Stewart Gordon:
It's perfectly legal code,
If that code is legal, then in my opinion it's the rules of the language that
are wrong
and in need to be changed :-)
You mean all programming languages should support CTFE for argument validation?
What if t
On Sat, 03 Dec 2011 10:26:09 +0100, David Nadlinger
wrote:
On 12/3/11 1:43 AM, simendsjo wrote:
On 02.12.2011 23:28, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
There's also been at least a couple of cases where people
have worked on unit libraries and discussed them in the main
newsgroup, but so
far, nothing
Timon Gehr:
> The reason is that it is parsed as function-local and that DMD's parser
> for some strange reason uses different grammar rules for declarations
> when inside a function body. You could maybe file a bug report.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7065
Bye,
bearophile
On 03-12-2011 20:14, Dejan Lekic wrote:
I recently stumbled on this thread: http://stackoverflow.com/
questions/5666321/what-is-assignment-via-curly-braces-called-and-can-it-
be-controlled
The important part is this:
8< - begin -
The Standard says in section §8.5.1/1,
On 12/04/2011 03:01 PM, GrahamC wrote:
Is there a good reason why align() applied to structure definitions is not
allowed on the struct definition line within unit-test code blocks?
E.g.:
unittest {
align(1) struct Foo {
char c;
int i;
}
On 12/04/2011 12:00 PM, Kagamin wrote:
Dejan Lekic Wrote:
Do D2 aggregates behave the same, or are there notable differences?
D restricts usage to static initializers only, C++ doesn't have this limitation.
This works:
struct S{int x;}
void main(){
int a;
S x = {a};
}
What does n
Is there a good reason why align() applied to structure definitions is not
allowed on the struct definition line within unit-test code blocks?
E.g.:
unittest {
align(1) struct Foo {
charc;
int i;
}
void Bar() {
Foo f;
}
On 2011-12-02 19:01, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I don't suppose there's any information out there on how DMD's sematic
passes work? (esp, regarding types, forward reference resolution and
DSymbol::scope as used by AggregateDeclaration, but I suppose getting that
specific might be asking too much).
I
Dejan Lekic Wrote:
> Do D2 aggregates behave the same, or are there notable differences?
D restricts usage to static initializers only, C++ doesn't have this limitation.
10 matches
Mail list logo
