On 2012-09-17 07:49, Elias Zamaria wrote:
I am planning to try D for the first time in my life. I have a MacBook
Pro running OS X 10.6.8 (Snow Leopard).
I went on the D downloads page and clicked on the link for the dmd 2.060
installer for OS X. I opened it and double clicked on the DMD2.pkg
On 2012-09-17 01:33, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
If we're talking Debian, the only compilers to consider are GDC and LDC
-- DMD is non-free by Debian standards.
I'm sure the runtimes are different anyway. Although, I don't know how
LDC handles the calling convention.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
Check the Console? How do I do that? What console are you
referring to?
Also, why is this installer on the official-looking download page
if it doesn't work? Should whoever is in control of the page put
this other thing there instead? I have no idea how I was supposed
to know about DVM.
On
On 2012-09-17 08:49, Elias Zamaria wrote:
Check the Console? How do I do that? What console are you referring to?
/Applications/Utilities/Console.app
Also, why is this installer on the official-looking download page if it
doesn't work? Should whoever is in control of the page put this other
Until now it is possible to have const keys in assocative arrays,
e.g. Tile[const Vector2s], but it isn't possible to have ref
keys, e.g. Tile[ref Vector2s].
If I have this code:
[code]
class A { }
A a1 = new A();
int[A] array;
[/code]
I can do:
array[new A()] = 42;
array[a1] = 23;
Both
Do you think it's useful and possible to extend the D type
inference (deduction) for templates to support something like
this (I know there are different ways to do this in D)?
struct Tree1 {
static struct Node { int x; }
}
struct Tree2 {
static struct Node { int x, y; }
}
void
On Monday, 17 September 2012 at 14:54:48 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Do you think it's useful and possible to extend the D type
inference (deduction) for templates to support something like
this (I know there are different ways to do this in D)?
struct Tree1 {
static struct Node { int x; }
}
Hi,
assuming I have following constuct:
public class Bank{
public enum test()
{
return writeln(\~__traits(identfier, this)~\);;
}
}
public static void main(){
Bank b = new Bank;
mixin(b.test());
}
During compile time, following code should be generated:
writeln(b);
Is
On 9/17/12, Andre an...@s-e-a-p.de wrote:
Get identifier of this
You can't really get that info at runtime, a class object isn't bound
to a name, 'this' has no identifier. Symbols (like variables) have
identifiers, not objects.
public class Bank{
Unnecessary, declarations are public by
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:01:35 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic
andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
Your original sample does cause a compiler ICE but I don't know if
it's worth filing since the code was invalid.
Please file, ICE should never occur.
-Steve
On 9/17/12, Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
Please file, ICE should never occur.
You're bound to find a small million of these when it comes to typos
in templates. :)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8679
On Monday, 17 September 2012 at 18:01:02 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 9/17/12, Andre an...@s-e-a-p.de wrote:
Get identifier of this
You can't really get that info at runtime, a class object isn't
bound
to a name, 'this' has no identifier. Symbols (like variables)
have
identifiers, not
On Monday, September 17, 2012 19:43:24 Andre wrote:
Hi,
assuming I have following constuct:
public class Bank{
public enum test()
{
return writeln(\~__traits(identfier, this)~\);;
}
}
public static void main(){
Bank b = new Bank;
mixin(b.test());
}
During compile time,
Recently was playing around with std.net.curl high-level API.
One thing that is a blocker for me is (quoting the docs):
@property void postData(const(char)[] data);
Specifying data to post when not using the onSend callback.
...
Content-Type will default to text/plain. Data is not converted or
On Monday, September 17, 2012 15:42:55 Namespace wrote:
Until now it is possible to have const keys in assocative arrays,
Keys are supposed to be immutable. If that's not enforced by the compiler,
then it's a bug. Given the current issues with the implementation for AAs' it
wouldn't surprise
does it still copy the slice?
As you can see here, you can change the key very easily:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/71697a23
But even they would be immutable: I have still no guarantee that
my key must be a lvalue. Or am I wrong? Otherwise I'm still for
ref keys.
Am Mon, 17 Sep 2012 22:33:28 +0400
schrieb Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com:
Recently was playing around with std.net.curl high-level API.
One thing that is a blocker for me is (quoting the docs):
@property void postData(const(char)[] data);
Specifying data to post when not using
On Monday, September 17, 2012 20:59:05 Johannes Pfau wrote:
addRequestHeader is quite dumb. It simply appends the header to a list.
So by just calling it again you would actually send 2 Content-Type
headers.
So, you're suggesting to send 2 content headers? That can't be good. It might
work,
It seems that nothrow functions/methods which take a AA have some
problems with .length and opApply, but I'm not sure if I should
report it as a bug.
Here the code:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/a61e721e
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/3652fcc4
On Monday, September 17, 2012 20:56:21 Namespace wrote:
As you can see here, you can change the key very easily:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/71697a23
It's a bug. It should already be reported somewhere, but I can't find it, so
re-reported it:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8681
The
I thought that new A() could be implicit immutable. Thanks for
reporting.
On Monday, 17 September 2012 at 13:42:08 UTC, Namespace wrote:
I can do:
array[new A()] = 42;
array[a1] = 23;
Both lines are valid.
But if I would access the elements later with their keys, I
can't because I have not a valid key for the element 42, only
for 23.
so my suggestion is: allow
On Monday, September 17, 2012 22:59:31 Namespace wrote:
It seems that nothrow functions/methods which take a AA have some
problems with .length and opApply, but I'm not sure if I should
report it as a bug.
Here the code:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/a61e721e
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/3652fcc4
length
On Monday, September 17, 2012 23:11:42 Namespace wrote:
I thought that new A() could be implicit immutable. Thanks for
reporting.
I'm sure that there are places where the compiler theoretically could
implicitly convert a class or struct instantiated with new to immutable (e.g.
when it's use
On 16/09/2012 23:32, cal wrote:
On Sunday, 16 September 2012 at 22:08:53 UTC, deed wrote:
Exactly. I couldn't remember seeing this error before.
I've only used the dsource Win32 bindings, because there is often stuff
missing from the phobos ones:
I need to iterate through two arrays and do some special comparisons,
but the arrays are not guaranteed to have the same length. lockstep
doesn't work with the longest policy, e.g.:
int[] a = [1, 2];
int[] b = [1, 2, 3];
foreach (aa, bb; lockstep(a, b, StoppingPolicy.longest)) // throws
{
}
On 9/17/12, Simon s.d.hamm...@gmail.com wrote:
You MUST NOT allow a D exception to
propagate out of the wndproc (or indeed any other Win32 callback
function) as the Win32 calling code has no idea how to process it and
you'll just get a crash.
That's just complete and utter bullshit. A
On 09/17/2012 03:00 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
I need to iterate through two arrays and do some special comparisons,
but the arrays are not guaranteed to have the same length. lockstep
doesn't work with the longest policy, e.g.:
int[] a = [1, 2];
int[] b = [1, 2, 3];
foreach (aa, bb;
On 9/18/12, Ali Çehreli acehr...@yahoo.com wrote:
I think you actually want .shortest, no?
No I want to continue iterating as long as one of the ranges is still
not empty. I'm not doing just comparisons, once there's only one range
that's not empty I have to do some special checks on its
On 9/18/12, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
foreach (aa, bb; lockstep(arr1, arr2))
{
if (aa == sentinel)
{
if (aa % 2 == 0)
Gah I've messed up the simple example. If aa was a sentinel then it
meant I wouldn't check it at all, I'd try to
On 9/18/12, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/18/12, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
foreach (aa, bb; lockstep(arr1, arr2))
{
if (aa == sentinel)
{
if (aa % 2 == 0)
Gah I've messed up the simple example. If aa was a
On 09/17/2012 03:51 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 9/18/12, Ali Çehreliacehr...@yahoo.com wrote:
I think you actually want .shortest, no?
No I want to continue iterating as long as one of the ranges is still
not empty. I'm not doing just comparisons, once there's only one range
that's not
On 9/18/12, Ali Çehreli acehr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Then .longest with zip seems to be the way to go.
Ah ain't that cool. It looks like it works. What does it use for the
sentinel, Type.init perhaps?
On 9/18/12, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/18/12, Ali Çehreli acehr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Then .longest with zip seems to be the way to go.
Ah ain't that cool. It looks like it works. What does it use for the
sentinel, Type.init perhaps?
Yep just tried with floats and
With a deimos header file, I expect to need only to pass the dpath to it
and the library it references to dmd, e.g.
stuff
- deimos
- python
- Python.d
dmd otherstuff -Istuff -L-lpython2.7
I should not need to actually pass stuff/deimos/python/Python.d to dmd.
Unfortunately, that is
On Sunday, 16 September 2012 at 18:33:22 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On Sunday, 16 September 2012 at 18:20:49 UTC, Jesse Phillips
wrote:
I'm thinking I this is supposed to be a compiler error and I
should report as a bug:
It is illegal for a GotoStatement to be used to skip
initializations.
I reported it, along with the console details, on the bug
tracker. You can see it at
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8682. I think it is
kind of strange that I need to install a 3rd party app just to be
able to install the compiler, especially considering that no one
else seems
On 09/17/2012 04:16 PM, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
With a deimos header file, I expect to need only to pass the dpath to it
and the library it references to dmd, e.g.
stuff
- deimos
- python
- Python.d
dmd otherstuff -Istuff -L-lpython2.7
I should not need to actually pass
39 matches
Mail list logo
