On 2012-10-15 22:35, Tyler Jameson Little wrote:
I'm basically trying to reproduce other JSON marshallers, like Go's, but
using compile-time reflection. Go uses runtime reflection, which D
notably does not support. I like the idea of compile-time reflection
better anyway. There are a few things
On 10/15/2012 12:03 PM, Tyler Jameson Little wrote:
I did my best in grokking
std.traits, but I may have missed some subtleties about what the
templates are actually testing.
You have mentioned needing an allMembers that excluded functions in one
of your other posts. The following thread was
Hi! How I can return from function a reference to int? Here is a
simple code, to demonstrate my problem:
struct Foo {
public:
@property int foo() const
{
return x_;
}
@property ref int foo(int value)
{
x_ = value;
On Tuesday, 16 October 2012 at 14:43:09 UTC, m0rph wrote:
Hi! How I can return from function a reference to int?
The problem here isn't about the ref but rather the way
properties are implemented with +=. I believe this is one of the
older still-standing D bugs.
It rewrites your
On Tuesday, 16 October 2012 at 00:50:54 UTC, Artur Skawina wrote:
Actually, I'm not really in any camp. UFCS has several obvious
problems plus likely
quite a few more subtle ones. Ignoring the issues does not make
them go away and
the
On Monday, 15 October 2012 at 09:33:23 UTC, Maxim Fomin wrote:
---foo.d---
struct A
{
int i;
alias i this;
}
---bar.d---
int opUnary(string T)(A a) { ... }
...
{
++a;
}
---
I. i is incremented, opUnary is not called. However opUnary
matches better to the actual type and if it
On Tuesday, 16 October 2012 at 16:12:06 UTC, Michael wrote:
void main() {
import std.range, std.stdio;
The problem is that UFCS only works on functions in the global
scope. The import inside a function makes them local, so it
doesn't consider them in it.
This is apparently by
On Tuesday, 16 October 2012 at 16:10:31 UTC, Tommi wrote:
On Monday, 15 October 2012 at 09:33:23 UTC, Maxim Fomin wrote:
---foo.d---
struct A
{
int i;
alias i this;
}
---bar.d---
int opUnary(string T)(A a) { ... }
...
{
++a;
}
---
I. i is incremented, opUnary is not called. However
On Tuesday, October 16, 2012 18:28:14 Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 October 2012 at 16:12:06 UTC, Michael wrote:
void main() {
import std.range, std.stdio;
The problem is that UFCS only works on functions in the global
scope. The import inside a function makes them local, so it
On 10/15/2012 10:29 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 21:53:48 -0400, Charles Hixson
charleshi...@earthlink.net wrote:
If std.stream is being deprecated, what is the correct way to deal
with file BOMs. This is particularly concerning utf8 files, which I
understand to be a bit
On 10/14/2012 10:28 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 18:53:48 -0700
Charles Hixsoncharleshi...@earthlink.net wrote:
If std.stream is being deprecated, what is the correct way to deal
with file BOMs. This is particularly concerning utf8 files, which I
understand to be a bit
On 10/14/2012 04:54 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 10/14/2012 04:36 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 10/15/12, Jonathan M Davisjmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
I'd have to see exactly what TDPL says to comment on that accurately
Maybe I've misread it. On Page 288 it says:
An immutable value is
Thanks for reply, hopefully this issue will be fixed sometime..
Am 15.10.2012 08:49, schrieb Alex Rønne Petersen:
Hi,
Is there a GC-free hash map implementation for D somewhere on the
intertubes? (Preferably in a Git repository and under a
liberal/non-viral license.)
https://github.com/Ingrater/druntime/blob/master/src/core/hashmap.d
Kind Regards
According to the spec, private module members are equivalent to
static
declarations in C programs. Why does this work (i.e. print 5)?
Both imported.d and sample.d are in same directory
(.../attributes).
Thanks
Dan
--
import
Dan:
Why does this work (i.e. print 5)?
It looks like a compiler bug/hole. DMD is not yet aligned to its
specs...
Is it in Bugzilla?
Bye,
bearophile
On Tuesday, 16 October 2012 at 19:31:45 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Dan:
Why does this work (i.e. print 5)?
It looks like a compiler bug/hole. DMD is not yet aligned to
its specs...
Is it in Bugzilla?
Bye,
bearophile
Thanks. I had assumed my interpretation was incorrect and was
just
On Monday, 15 October 2012 at 20:58:36 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
A hybrid. I'm currently trying to get into Phobos:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/787
I'll have to look it over in more detail another time.
Although another question comes to mind. How many
I want to do something like this (Collection is a custom type):
Collection x = new Collection();
x.add(something);
x.add(somethingElse);
foreach(type value; x)
{
writeln(value);
}
Collection is a class with a private array member variable which
actually holds the collection data entered
On Wednesday, October 17, 2012 00:03:46 Gary Willoughby wrote:
I want to do something like this (Collection is a custom type):
Collection x = new Collection();
x.add(something);
x.add(somethingElse);
foreach(type value; x)
{
writeln(value);
}
Collection is a class with a private
I haven't found this specific topic anywhere in the archives so
I'll throw it out there for feedback.
[quote] TDPL pg. 81
There is no ambiguity-related danger in using nested 'with's
because the language disallows shadowing of a symbol introduced
by an outer with by a symbol introduced by
I am interfacing with some C code [python.dll], which has some structs
declared like so:
PyTypeObject PyType_Type;
I wish to be able to link to PyType_Type like so:
extern(C) __gshared PyTypeObject PyType_Type;
in linux, I can do exactly that, but optlink is generating a new memory
location
22 matches
Mail list logo
