On Wednesday, 7 November 2012 at 10:24:25 UTC, Benjamin Thaut
wrote:
For example: Exporting the Module init symbol is not supported,
so every module that only exists in a dll will generate a
linker error. Also I had some cases where even the vtable
symbol did not get exported (despite the that
If I use a pointer as the payload type for my d_list, it compiles
OK.
I'd rather not use a pointer for the payload, and it will compile
in D if I hard code in the payload type.
--rt
I want to create a simple recursive data structure as follows:
struct R
{
int value;
d_list!R Rlist;
}
// d-linked list with templated payload
struct d_list( T )
{
struct node
{
T payload;
node* pred;
node* succ;
}
node* head;
node* tail;
}
The compiler co
Am Wed, 07 Nov 2012 19:56:35 +0100
schrieb Joseph Rushton Wakeling :
> On 11/07/2012 06:53 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > I think on Posix systems, malloc/free does not return freed memory back
> > to the OS, it just gets reused by the process later on.
>
> I have to say that in this program, it looks
Am 07.11.2012 21:31, schrieb DypthroposTheImposter:
thanks, do you happen to know which D compilers can output to a format
that is capable of linking with visual studio(specifically 2012) C++?
Ya I'm ok with the C interface, kinda what I expected..
The best option would be to use the digital m
thanks, do you happen to know which D compilers can output to a
format that is capable of linking with visual studio(specifically
2012) C++? Ya I'm ok with the C interface, kinda what I
expected..
Am 07.11.2012 20:01, schrieb DypthroposTheImposter:
can you statically link D to C++(no dll)?
If you compile it with a compiler that puts out the same object format, yes.
But if you want to have a interface to C or C++ you will need a C-Style
interface anyway, so that works with DLLs.
Kind
can you statically link D to C++(no dll)?
On 11/07/2012 06:53 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
I think on Posix systems, malloc/free does not return freed memory back
to the OS, it just gets reused by the process later on.
I have to say that in this program, it looks like the memory usage keeps
increasing even after the free(), even though theor
On Friday, 2 November 2012 at 15:56:47 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
ref D opAssign(D other) {
swap(c, other.c);
return this;
}
There may be corner cases where this is not efficient, but
considering that assignment involves two sub-operations (make a
copy of the new state an
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 06:12:52PM +0100, bearophile wrote:
> Joseph Rushton Wakeling:
>
> >... but despite the GC.free(), memory usage stays at peak level
> >for the rest of the runtime of the function.
>
> GC.free() usually works. Some memory allocators don't give back the
> memory to the OS, n
Joseph Rushton Wakeling:
... but despite the GC.free(), memory usage stays at peak level
for the rest of the runtime of the function.
GC.free() usually works. Some memory allocators don't give back
the memory to the OS, no matter what, until the process is over,
despite that memory is free f
On 11/07/2012 03:17 PM, bearophile wrote:
One solution is to allocate the original array on the C heap. Another solution
is to allocate it normally from the GC heap and then use GC.free().
Well, what I've got is something like this:
auto raw = rawInput(); /* loads data and outputs a
Joseph Rushton Wakeling:
Can anyone advise? I would rather not disable the GC entirely
as there's lots of Phobos I want to be able to use -- but I'd
really like it if I could indicate categorically to the GC,
"these objects and arrays need to be deleted and the memory
freed _now_".
One sol
Hello all,
I'm doing some work with a fairly large dataset. For various reasons it's
convenient to import it first as simply an array of data points which is then
used to generate other data structures (actually, technically it's an array of
data points plus a couple of associative arrays, wh
Very clear and much appreciated.
On Tuesday, 6 November 2012 at 23:38:00 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
If a function requires an lvalue, then you have to pass a
[snip]
You'd have to do something like
string file = __FILE__;
size_t line = __LINE__;
auto f = foo();
auto b = bar(7);
writefln("%
On Wednesday, 7 November 2012 at 06:38:32 UTC, Raphaël Jakse
wrote:
==
override size_t toHash() const
{
return (typeid(firstName).getHash(&firstName) +
typeid(lastName).getHash(&lastName));
}
==
Isn't the real problem the addition. You want to mix the bits
Am 07.11.2012 03:04, schrieb Matt:
The DLL page on the main D site is out of date in its example, importing
module std.gc, which doesn't exist. Has connecting to DLLs become
easier, harder, or just plain different? And in what ways should I go
about doing so? My personal requirement is dynamic lo
18 matches
Mail list logo
