On Sunday, 20 May 2012 at 13:50:17 UTC, japplegame wrote:
I write function template that should works only with POD types
(i.e. base types, structures, enums etc.). Is there something
like C++11 std::is_pod
(http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/types/is_pod) template?
Sorry for resurrecting this
On Saturday, 29 December 2012 at 00:46:15 UTC, FG wrote:
I'm trying out the latest GtkD binding. The lib has built
without problems, some example programs also compile, but I
can't run them. The Gtk-Runtime-3.6 archive provided at
https://github.com/gtkd-developers/GtkD/downloads is missing
se
On Friday, December 28, 2012 23:29:38 Namespace wrote:
> Spontaneous question: why was the behavior altered from lvalue to
> rvalue if there is still no replacement with "auto ref" and so a
> lot of code becomes invalid?
> I know of course that the change was necessary, but as long as
> there is no
On Friday, 28 December 2012 at 20:19:49 UTC, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
On 2012-42-28 16:12, Zhenya wrote:
Hi!
Tell me please,are there any way to check whether number is
NaN?
us std.math.isNaN. But if you really don't want to:
float x = ...;
if (x != x) {
writeln( "x is NaN" );
}
I'm uns
I'm trying out the latest GtkD binding. The lib has built without problems, some
example programs also compile, but I can't run them. The Gtk-Runtime-3.6 archive
provided at https://github.com/gtkd-developers/GtkD/downloads is missing several
win32 DLL libraries:
LIBRARY.GLGDK: "li
On Thursday, 27 December 2012 at 21:21:24 UTC, Philippe Sigaud
wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 9:01 PM, comco
wrote:
I wrote a simple template mixin to hold common operator
overloads:
mixin template VectorSpaceOpsMixin(Vector, Scalar, alias a,
alias b)
{
Vector opUnary(string op)() if
Spontaneous question: why was the behavior altered from lvalue to
rvalue if there is still no replacement with "auto ref" and so a
lot of code becomes invalid?
I know of course that the change was necessary, but as long as
there is no fix I don't understand such ruthless change.
It meant no off
On Friday, December 28, 2012 22:21:09 Namespace wrote:
> > 2.061 is beta. I think that the chances of it having something
> > like this in it
> > are very close to zero.
> >
> > - Jonathan M Davis
>
> You know how to give a suffering hope. :D
LOL. Yeah, well. It's not like I'm going to lie about
2.061 is beta. I think that the chances of it having something
like this in it
are very close to zero.
- Jonathan M Davis
You know how to give a suffering hope. :D
On Friday, December 28, 2012 13:19:01 Namespace wrote:
> In consideration that Andrei said that the implementation of
> "auto ref" for none-template functions are relatively easy and
> that until now only the first beta of 2.061 came out: How likely
> is it that "auto ref" will implemented in this
When I used dmd on bsd, I just recompiled it from source.
cd dmd2/src/dmd
make -f posix.mak
cp dmd ../../freebsd/bin32
and then you can use it from in there.
On 2012-42-28 16:12, Zhenya wrote:
Hi!
Tell me please,are there any way to check whether number is NaN?
us std.math.isNaN. But if you really don't want to:
float x = ...;
if (x != x) {
writeln( "x is NaN" );
}
I'm unsure how aggressive the optimizer is allowed to be in cases
like this.
I am attempting to install DMD on BSD and a running into some issues.
The first issue is that there is no dmd.conf file bundled in
freebsd/bin32. I mirrored the content of /osx/bin/dmd.conf but am not
sure if there is anything unique to FREEBSD or some other BSD flavor
that needs to be in this
I wrote a workaround for me: I implement it in Romulus. So for
these functions:
[code]
void foo(auto ref const Foo f) {
// do something with f
}
const(int[42]) bar(auto ref const Foo a, auto ref const Foo b)
pure nothrow {
// do something with a and b
}
const(int[42]) quatz(a
Tell me please,are there any way to check whether number is
NaN?
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_math.html#isNaN
pure nothrow @trusted bool isNaN(real x);
Returns !=0 if e is a NaN.
---
Seems like a slight documentation disagreement. Shows bool
prototype but description sa
On Friday, 28 December 2012 at 15:59:35 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Zhenya:
Tell me please,are there any way to check whether number is
NaN?
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_math.html#isNaN
Bye,
bearophile
Thank you!
Hi!
Tell me please,are there any way to check whether number is NaN?
On Friday, 28 December 2012 at 12:47:03 UTC, Namespace wrote:
On Friday, 28 December 2012 at 12:28:01 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Namespace:
How likely is it that "auto ref" will implemented in this
release?
Walter wants to release 2.061 "soon". So maybe that's for the
successive (unstable?) ver
On Thu, 2012-12-27 at 13:39 -0500, n00b wrote:
> Le 24/12/2012 05:18, thedeemon a écrit :
> > On Sunday, 23 December 2012 at 08:00:56 UTC, n00b wrote:
> >> Hello.
> >> My program has a great deal of computation to do, so I thought I'd
> >> create several threads in order to use multiple processors.
On Friday, 28 December 2012 at 12:28:01 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Namespace:
How likely is it that "auto ref" will implemented in this
release?
Walter wants to release 2.061 "soon". So maybe that's for the
successive (unstable?) version of the compiler.
Bye,
bearophile
As long as it is impl
Namespace:
How likely is it that "auto ref" will implemented in this
release?
Walter wants to release 2.061 "soon". So maybe that's for the
successive (unstable?) version of the compiler.
Bye,
bearophile
In consideration that Andrei said that the implementation of
"auto ref" for none-template functions are relatively easy and
that until now only the first beta of 2.061 came out: How likely
is it that "auto ref" will implemented in this release? Maybe an
official statement would be good.
Purel
On Friday, 28 December 2012 at 10:40:32 UTC, FG wrote:
I don't require manual malloc. I wanted to make a hint to the
GC, that this block can be freed, because I know there are no
other pointers into it (that would be used later), while the
imprecise GC finds false pointers and prevents the bloc
On 2012-12-28 05:41, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
The idea is that if you want to be manually freeing memory, you shouldn't be
using GC memory in the first place. It's unsafe to be freeing it. Let the GC do
that. If you want to manually manage memory, then manually manage it with
malloc and free. If y
On 2012-12-28 01:08, Minas Mina wrote:
Note that there is more code after bool hit = ...
but I didn't include it because the problem is in the trace
function (I commented it out and everything else worked -- apart
from the things are dependent on it of course)
Why don't you show the trace funct
25 matches
Mail list logo
