On Tuesday, 22 January 2013 at 00:10:22 UTC, bearophile wrote:
I suggest to put your code on Rosettacode now, and then we'll
do the changes there... As you see in other answers, both me
and monarch_dodra have other ideas for improvements.
Ok, posted it.
On Tuesday, 22 January 2013 at 08:12:03 UTC, qznc wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 January 2013 at 00:10:22 UTC, bearophile wrote:
I suggest to put your code on Rosettacode now, and then we'll
do the changes there... As you see in other answers, both me
and monarch_dodra have other ideas for
On Friday, 18 January 2013 at 13:13:03 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-01-18 14:07, Namespace wrote:
Despite the danger that this annoy you probably:
What about pull 1019
(https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1019)? I'm
still
quite new with Git so I do not know exactly what 1
On Tuesday, 22 January 2013 at 09:26:25 UTC, cal wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 January 2013 at 08:12:03 UTC, qznc wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 January 2013 at 00:10:22 UTC, bearophile wrote:
I suggest to put your code on Rosettacode now, and then we'll
do the changes there... As you see in other answers,
I was trying to do a simple program to test message passing.
Basically, I have 1 owner, and 2 slave threads.
I'm facing two problems:
1 ) First, I want the slaves to be informed of when the master
dies in an abnormal way.
TDPL suggest OwnerFailed, but apparently, the out of band
exception
On Tuesday, 22 January 2013 at 09:29:07 UTC, Namespace wrote:
On Friday, 18 January 2013 at 13:13:03 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2013-01-18 14:07, Namespace wrote:
Despite the danger that this annoy you probably:
What about pull 1019
(https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1019)?
On Tuesday, 22 January 2013 at 10:27:58 UTC, bearophile wrote:
I have modified a little the code on RosettaCode (no changes in
the logic).
monarch_dodra:
Avoids deadlock.
imagine 2 threads:
a: from 2 to 5.
b: from 5 to 2.
If both threads acquire their first lock, then you have a dead
monarch_dodra:
That's a good point, and I'm sure we could also have a version
of D that could also do it that way.
Someone is willing to create that second version for RosettaCode?
I have modified a bit the second and third Go versions on
Rosettacode, now there are 20 buckets and it shows
I have modified a bit the second and third Go versions on
Rosettacode,
The changes on the Go versions are only on my local copies of the
code.
Bye,
bearophile
Hey, me again.
I cloned dmd from git head and try to build it with: make
-fwin32.mak release
But I get these errors:
dmc -c -Ibackend;tk -DMARS -cpp -D -g -DUNITTEST -e -wx
-DDM_TARGET_CPU_X86=1 -
I. backend\cgelem
elerr,
^
elxxx.c(3) : Error: need explicit cast to
On 22.1.2013 11:08, monarch_dodra wrote:
I was trying to do a simple program to test message passing.
Basically, I have 1 owner, and 2 slave threads.
I'm facing two problems:
1 ) First, I want the slaves to be informed of when the master dies in
an abnormal way.
TDPL suggest
I have tried to scope the Mutex, but the D code gets a little
slower, I don't know why:
5,6d5
import std.typecons: scoped;
import std.traits: ReturnType;
19,22c17,19
ReturnType!(scoped!Mutex) mtx;
alias this = value;
}
// pragma(msg, Bucket.sizeof); // 52 bytes
On Tuesday, 22 January 2013 at 10:27:58 UTC, bearophile wrote:
The Go language has four different solutions, one of them is:
http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Atomic_updates#Lock-free
From the site:
This version uses no locking for the phase where the
two clients are updating the buckets. Instead
On Tuesday, 22 January 2013 at 14:10:14 UTC, qznc wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 January 2013 at 10:27:58 UTC, bearophile wrote:
The Go language has four different solutions, one of them is:
http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Atomic_updates#Lock-free
From the site:
This version uses no locking for the
On 01/22/2013 04:26 AM, Martin Drasar wrote:
On 22.1.2013 11:08, monarch_dodra wrote:
I was trying to do a simple program to test message passing.
wouldn't this help you?
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_concurrency.html#.spawnLinked
The following chapter may be helpful as well:
Hm, has really no one an idea what's wrong? I'm followed strict
the steps that are described in the wiki.
On Tuesday, 22 January 2013 at 14:56:16 UTC, Namespace wrote:
Hm, has really no one an idea what's wrong? I'm followed strict
the steps that are described in the wiki.
Do you have the latest github dmd? Could just be that you pulled
the code at the exact moment it wasn't compiling.
monarch_dodra:
D has attomic swap operations too, AFAIK.
In core.atomic I think there is what's needed, cas and atomicOp:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/blob/master/src/core/atomic.d
Do you know why the site doesn't show the ddocs here?
On Tuesday, 22 January 2013 at 12:27:12 UTC, Martin Drasar wrote:
Hi,
wouldn't this help you?
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_concurrency.html#.spawnLinked
According to documentation: Executes the supplied function in a
new
context represented by Tid. This new context is linked to the
calling
On 22.1.2013 16:00, bearophile wrote:
Do you know why the site doesn't show the ddocs here?
http://dlang.org/phobos/core_atomic.html
Wild guess, but couldn't it be because the ddoc documentation is inside
version(CoreDdoc) and not processed?
Martin
On Tuesday, 22 January 2013 at 14:58:50 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 January 2013 at 14:56:16 UTC, Namespace wrote:
Hm, has really no one an idea what's wrong? I'm followed
strict the steps that are described in the wiki.
Do you have the latest github dmd? Could just be that you
Martin Drasar:
Wild guess, but couldn't it be because the ddoc documentation
is inside
version(CoreDdoc) and not processed?
The question then becomes why is that version(CoreDdoc) used :-)
Bye,
bearophile
On Tuesday, 22 January 2013 at 15:10:14 UTC, Namespace wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 January 2013 at 14:58:50 UTC, monarch_dodra
wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 January 2013 at 14:56:16 UTC, Namespace wrote:
Hm, has really no one an idea what's wrong? I'm followed
strict the steps that are described in the
On Tuesday, 22 January 2013 at 09:47:25 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
Avoids deadlock.
imagine 2 threads:
a: from 2 to 5.
b: from 5 to 2.
If both threads acquire their first lock, then you have a dead
lock, and your program is basically dead.
By always locking low first, you avoid the deadlock
On Monday, 21 January 2013 at 20:35:16 UTC, bearophile wrote:
qznc:
Code: http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/e6615a53
Any comments or improvements?
I have reformatted your code a little, according to the style
used in all other D entries of RosettaCode:
http://codepad.org/ceDyQ8lE
The usage of a
On Tuesday, 22 January 2013 at 18:10:27 UTC, cal wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 January 2013 at 09:47:25 UTC, monarch_dodra
wrote:
Avoids deadlock.
imagine 2 threads:
a: from 2 to 5.
b: from 5 to 2.
If both threads acquire their first lock, then you have a dead
lock, and your program is basically
ixid:
I note you always seem to use in in your functions and on
reddit seemed to imply that this was the idiomatic way of using
D yet I recall Jonathan M Davies posting that using in was a
bad idea.
I think in is supposed to be(come) idiomatic, because it's
short, and it's supposed to
On 01/22/2013 09:04 AM, monarch_dodra wrote:
I'm getting some errors with this program:
I can not reproduce this problem on Linux. Not with -m64 nor with -m32.
I don't think the following is necessary but it has been a workaround
for me in the past:
import core.thread;
void main(string[]
After Atomic Updates from rosettacode.org, here is
S-Expressions.
Problem: http://rosettacode.org/wiki/S-Expressions
Code: http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/fd485808
Comments, improvements?
Maybe I should describe _exactly_ what I did to earn help.
I make a new directory with:
mkdir d
then I wrote
git clone git://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd.git
git clone git://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime.git
git clone git://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos.git
dir
On Tuesday, 22 January 2013 at 20:47:46 UTC, Namespace wrote:
So what is wrong now? A few days ago it works fine. I don't
understand that. :/
Strange. That's what I do (verbatim), so it should work.
Which make is being called? What is your DMC?
Could you try it with *only* X/dm/bin in you
No idea.
Just updated my own dmd sources.
I rebuilt it fine with both dmc 852c and 856c, in both release
non-release :/
On Tuesday, 22 January 2013 at 21:35:48 UTC, Namespace wrote:
dmc prints before
Digital Mars Compiler Version 8.42n
and also after I replaced it with your version.
Have I forget something?
And still the same error. That weird. oO
Ah, I forgot, sorry. I'm using:
Digital Mars Make Version 5.06
Am 22.01.2013 23:25, schrieb cal:
const uint WINVER = blah
try:
static const uint WINVER = blah
But I have no idea why it changed
On Tuesday, 22 January 2013 at 22:15:13 UTC, Namespace wrote:
In my distress I have now tried with dmd_msc_vs10.
I get no such error but others:
1cl : Befehlszeile warning D9025: /TC wird durch /TP
überschrieben
1mars.c(905): warning C4805: '!=': unsichere Kombination von
Typ 'char' mit Typ
On 1/22/13, cal callumena...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to compile a project using the Win32 api header's
(the Dsource ones) with 2.061 and am getting errors for the first
time with things like this:
Try making these changes:
On Thursday, 17 January 2013 at 18:36:16 UTC, Regan Heath wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:02:04 -, Regan Heath
re...@netmail.co.nz wrote:
Ok, solved the issue I think.
Appreciatd all the help and am very excited that it finaly
works,WOW!
Now I can see (in Visual-D debugger) the Chinese
I've tested and the Chinese character issue really fixed!
But I have two more issues here.
1.for connect with DSNless string function provided by my
original code as below,I can not make it to connect successfully
with really database file.Don't now why yours works.
bool connect(string
Is it possible to create a shared signal class?
I would like to create a shared signal class so some other
process that knows certain things can come along emit its info to
any observer:
import std.stdio, std.signals;
class Observer {
void watch(string msg) {
writeln(msg);
}
On Wednesday, 23 January 2013 at 07:11:59 UTC, Joshua Niehus
wrote:
Is it possible to create a shared signal class?
oh god... dont tell me __gshared !
Think i answered my own question, it got me to the next step.
going to have to read through those giant shared threads again
40 matches
Mail list logo
