On Tuesday, 5 March 2013 at 07:53:15 UTC, cal wrote:
I'm confused about this:
import std.conv;
void main()
{
enum s = `1`.to!int;;
enum c = __traits(compiles, mixin({auto a = new
~s~;})); // line 1
mixin(auto a = ~s~;);
// line 2
}
This does not compile, giving errors about
On Tuesday, 5 March 2013 at 08:04:12 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
You can't test declarations inside of __traits(compiles), only
expressions. It's in the docs:
http://dlang.org/traits.html#compiles
So why does this work:
import std.conv;
void main()
{
enum s = `1`.to!int;;
enum c =
On Tuesday, 5 March 2013 at 08:09:37 UTC, cal wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 March 2013 at 08:04:12 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
You can't test declarations inside of __traits(compiles), only
expressions. It's in the docs:
http://dlang.org/traits.html#compiles
So why does this work:
import std.conv;
On Tuesday, 5 March 2013 at 08:04:12 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 March 2013 at 07:53:15 UTC, cal wrote:
I'm confused about this:
import std.conv;
void main()
{
enum s = `1`.to!int;;
enum c = __traits(compiles, mixin({auto a = new
~s~;})); // line 1
mixin(auto a =
On 3/5/13, cal callumena...@gmail.com wrote:
So why does this work:
import std.conv;
void main()
{
enum s = `1`.to!int;;
enum c = __traits(compiles, mixin({auto x = ~s~;})); //
true
}
That's a function literal, i.e. an expression.
On Tuesday, 5 March 2013 at 08:14:58 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
Hmm.. And this also works:
enum c = __traits(compiles, mixin({auto a = new 1;}));
Something to do with CTFE combined with mixins?
But it gets this right, in that c is false. I had thought that by
wrapping the declaration in braces,
On 5-3-2013 2:05, bearophile wrote:
But if you fear that, then I've added private to all global identifiers:
http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Simple_database#D
I have removed private again, because it's bad to program compromises.
This is a complete program, it's not a module, and it's not
On 5-3-2013 11:45, Jos van Uden wrote:
On 5-3-2013 2:05, bearophile wrote:
But if you fear that, then I've added private to all global identifiers:
http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Simple_database#D
I have removed private again, because it's bad to program compromises.
This is a complete program,
On 03/05/2013 08:53 AM, cal wrote:
I'm confused about this:
import std.conv;
void main()
{
enum s = `1`.to!int;;
enum c = __traits(compiles, mixin({auto a = new ~s~;})); // line 1
mixin(auto a = ~s~;); // line 2
}
This does not compile, giving errors about instantiating
Jos van Uden:
// this shouldn't happen
test.d
import simdb;
If I try to compile something like that my dmd gives me a
duplicated main error, or something similar.
I really mean:
test.d
void fun() {
auto db = load();
// etc
store(db);
}
simdb.d
import test;
fun();
On 03/04/2013 11:24 AM, SaltySugar wrote:
On Monday, 4 March 2013 at 13:25:22 UTC, Matthew Caron wrote:
On 03/03/2013 08:16 AM, SaltySugar wrote:
wxD - dead or alive?
I've been using it. What makes you think that it's dead?
Because It's latest release was at 2011-08-26
In all fairness, I
On Tuesday, 5 March 2013 at 13:12:49 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Jos van Uden:
// this shouldn't happen
test.d
import simdb;
If I try to compile something like that my dmd gives me a
duplicated main error, or something similar.
Sorry, that was a wrong example.
I really mean:
test.d
void
On Tuesday, 5 March 2013 at 12:58:57 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
Compiles as expected with DMD 2.060. It is probably a
regression.
Ah you're right, also with 2.061. I'll file.
On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 12:24 -0800, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[…]
Is there a way to parallelize this kind of operations?
What do you mean by parallelize? Run in multiple threads? I don't
think you can do that, because the result of filter depends on what it
gets from map.
This shows the deficiency
Am 05.03.2013 03:36, schrieb bearophile:
I am thinking about one enhancement request, but I am not sure if the
idea is meaningful, so I show it here first.
The presence of both function pointers and delegates makes the usage of
higher order functions harder in D compared to function
On Tuesday, 5 March 2013 at 02:36:45 UTC, bearophile wrote:
I am thinking about one enhancement request, but I am not sure
if the idea is meaningful, so I show it here first.
The problem here is that the D calling convention for functions
is different from that of delegates for whatever
On Monday, 4 March 2013 at 04:45:45 UTC, Brad Roberts wrote:
Has this implementation been bounced off the w3c xml test suite?
I don't know, but the xml tests don't seem to be the those
provided by W3C
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~michael-rynn-500/d2-xml/d2-xml-dev/files/head:/test/xmltest/
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 03:11:42AM +0100, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Monday, 4 March 2013 at 20:49:22 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
Very interesting. IMHO that should be pointed out better in
docs/example.
You say interleaving is default, how can I guess if a function
doesn't use the default
H. S. Teoh:
A range is an abstraction akin to C++'s iterators (except
better, IMO).
Stepanov himself has commented very briefly about Alexandrescu/D
Ranges in one of his video lessons. I have not fully understood
what Stepanov has said with those few words spoken in a not so
good English
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 04:25:33AM +0100, bearophile wrote:
[...]
Stepanov himself has commented very briefly about Alexandrescu/D
Ranges in one of his video lessons. I have not fully understood what
Stepanov has said with those few words spoken in a not so good
English (not because of
20 matches
Mail list logo
