On 05/25/2013 10:20 PM, estew wrote:
On Sunday, 26 May 2013 at 05:01:10 UTC, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
I have a project here which fails on link on ubuntu 12.10.
It give undefined reference errors for functions in libdl and libutil.
For some reason, ld won't cooperate unless you pass -ldl -lutil
huh. I haven't run into it on fedora. python is built
differently, though.
dmd -L-lpthread -L-ldl -L-lutil -L-L/usr/lib -L-lz
/usr/lib/python2.7/config/libpython2.7.a -debug
-ofbuild/lib.linux-x86_64-2.7/link {lotsaobjectfiles} -L-ldl
-L-lutil -v
Well, that should work fine, although the
On 05/24/2013 04:39 PM, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
First, *is* it read-only? If so, store it as immutable and enjoy free
sharing. If not, how and why not?
I can confess that it's as simple as feeling extremely uncomfortable dealing
with immutable where it relates to any kind of complex data
On 05/24/2013 05:59 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
The following simple example uses mutable data but it should work with
'const' too.
Limiting ourselves to read-only, won't there still be a slowdown caused by
multiple threads trying to access the same data? The particular case I have
will involve
On Sun, 26 May 2013 14:06:39 +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote:
On 05/24/2013 04:39 PM, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
First, *is* it read-only? If so, store it as immutable and enjoy free
sharing. If not, how and why not?
I can confess that it's as simple as feeling
On Sun, 26 May 2013 14:06:39 +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote:
On 05/24/2013 04:39 PM, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
First, *is* it read-only? If so, store it as immutable and enjoy free
sharing. If not, how and why not?
I can confess that it's as simple as feeling
On Sunday, 26 May 2013 at 12:08:41 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
On 05/24/2013 05:59 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
The following simple example uses mutable data but it should
work with 'const' too.
Limiting ourselves to read-only, won't there still be a
slowdown caused by
multiple threads
Hi!
I am want to get list of fields types and offsets in struct by
the template.
I.e., lookup through this struct:
struct S {
int a;
string b;
someptr* c;
};
template Lookup!( S )(); returns something as:
field #0, int, offset 0
field #1, string, offset 8,
field #2, someptr, offset 16
How
On Sunday, 26 May 2013 at 05:01:10 UTC, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
I have a project here which fails on link on ubuntu 12.10.
It give undefined reference errors for functions in libdl and
libutil. For some reason, ld won't cooperate unless you pass
-ldl -lutil at the end of the command string.
On Sunday, 26 May 2013 at 14:19:13 UTC, mimi wrote:
Hi!
I am want to get list of fields types and offsets in struct by
the template.
I.e., lookup through this struct:
struct S {
int a;
string b;
someptr* c;
};
template Lookup!( S )(); returns something as:
field #0, int, offset 0
field
On 05/26/2013 07:55 AM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Sunday, 26 May 2013 at 05:01:10 UTC, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
I have a project here which fails on link on ubuntu 12.10.
It give undefined reference errors for functions in libdl and libutil.
For some reason, ld won't cooperate unless you pass
On 05/26/2013 08:10 AM, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
On 05/26/2013 07:55 AM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Sunday, 26 May 2013 at 05:01:10 UTC, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
I have a project here which fails on link on ubuntu 12.10.
It give undefined reference errors for functions in libdl and libutil.
For
On Sunday, 26 May 2013 at 14:19:13 UTC, mimi wrote:
Hi!
I am want to get list of fields types and offsets in struct by
the template.
I.e., lookup through this struct:
struct S {
int a;
string b;
someptr* c;
};
template Lookup!( S )(); returns something as:
field #0, int, offset 0
field
On 05/26/2013 05:38 AM, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
Tuple!(size_t, size_t)[][] data = createData();
immutable dataImm = assumeUnique(data);
data = null; // Simply to ensure no mutable references exist.
The last line is not needed. assumeUnique already does that. :)
Ali
On 05/26/2013 06:50 PM, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
On Sunday, 26 May 2013 at 16:28:33 UTC, Mike Wey wrote:
Try prefixing the python lib with -L like so:
dmd -unittest -property -debug -gc -version=Python_2_7_Or_Later
-version=Python_2_6_Or_Later -version=Python_2_5_Or_Later
On Sun, 26 May 2013 17:59:32 +0200, Ali Çehreli acehr...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 05/26/2013 05:38 AM, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
Tuple!(size_t, size_t)[][] data = createData();
immutable dataImm = assumeUnique(data);
data = null; // Simply to ensure no mutable references exist.
import std.stdio;
struct S
{
int bigUglyName;
void foo( S s )
{
alias bigUglyName local;
alias s.bigUglyName b;
writeln( bigUglyName (AKA local)=, local, b=, b );
}
}
void main()
{
S s1;
S s2;
s1.bigUglyName = 1;
s2.bigUglyName = 2;
Wow! thanks!
On Sunday, 26 May 2013 at 23:37:01 UTC, mimi wrote:
Wow! thanks!
offsetof will automatically distribute over the arguments so to
get the offsets of a tuple you can just do:
auto tmp = TP.offsetof;
And tmp will be a tuple of the offsets.
On Sunday, 26 May 2013 at 23:35:43 UTC, mimi wrote:
import std.stdio;
struct S
{
int bigUglyName;
void foo( S s )
{
alias bigUglyName local;
alias s.bigUglyName b;
writeln( bigUglyName (AKA local)=, local, b=, b );
}
}
void main()
{
S s1;
S
20 matches
Mail list logo
