On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 22:33:03 -0400, Sergei Nosov
wrote:
So, is my understanding correct? If yes, why the path with memory
barriers was "announced", but not taken?
Having recently acquired (no pun intended) new knowledge on how hard
memory races are to solve with language syntax and primi
Thank you for answers. Let me check if I got this right.
On Monday, June 10, 2013 13:23:26 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
shared was supposed to infer memory barriers, but AFAIK, it
doesn't do
that. Not sure it ever will.
So, my first impression about what shared should do (no low-level
races a
did you mean Object.factory() ? It almost does it, but still have
to cast the object to the right class (where I can't use a string
variable it seems) to use it or make all the classes I want to
instantiate this way inherit from the same interface.
thank you bearophile for pointing me in the r
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:46:27 -0400, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Monday, June 10, 2013 13:23:26 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
shared was supposed to infer memory barriers, but AFAIK, it doesn't do
that. Not sure it ever will.
I believe that things are definitely leaning towards shared not addi
On Monday, June 10, 2013 13:23:26 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> shared was supposed to infer memory barriers, but AFAIK, it doesn't do
> that. Not sure it ever will.
I believe that things are definitely leaning towards shared not adding memory
barriers. There _might_ be something that happens wit
Do you get any error messages?
None that I know of. It compiles and starts to launch, then just
throws an exception.
On 06/10/2013 04:51 PM, Daemon wrote:
Hello, I'd appreciate any help.
I downloaded the GtkD sources and built the GtkD.lib using rdmd, so far
so good. I have followed the instructions in "Installing on Windows"
(editing sc.ini and copying contents of the src folder of GtkD into
DMD's src folder,
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:38:43 -0400, Sergei Nosov
wrote:
Hi!
I'm puzzled with what's the difference between shared and __gshared.
shared is part of the type, __gshared is not.
The danger of __gshared is that the compiler treats it as if it were not
shared. You better know what you are d
On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 23:15:42 -0400, Timothee Cour
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Friday, June 07, 2013 23:23:25 Timothee Cour wrote:
> Why can't we detect at compile time module ctor/dtor cycles (instead
of
> runtime) ?
At minimum, separate compilat
Dmitry Olshansky:
Now there was a discussion on it recently which indicates that
shared data might lose it's built-in ops to prevent confusion
and require folks to just use core.atomic directly for
lock-free or alternatively cast+mutex for lock-based.
Looks like a good idea.
Bye,
bearophjil
Hello, I'd appreciate any help.
I downloaded the GtkD sources and built the GtkD.lib using rdmd,
so far so good. I have followed the instructions in "Installing
on Windows" (editing sc.ini and copying contents of the src
folder of GtkD into DMD's src folder, etc.). I also installed the
Gtk 3.
10-Jun-2013 17:38, Sergei Nosov пишет:
Hi!
I'm puzzled with what's the difference between shared and __gshared.
Until now I've (mistakenly) considered that shared variables are free
from low-level data races. I.e. the operations with shared data are
atomic. And that __gshared is the "usual" (in
On Monday, 10 June 2013 at 09:42:56 UTC, Elvis wrote:
class A
{
enum TypeID = 1;
}
class B : A
{
enum TypeID = 2;
}
class C : A
{
enum TypeID = 3;
}
class D : B
{
enum TypeID = 4;
}
...
Could anybody shed some light on how to make these TypeIDs auto
increment at compile time
Sergei Nosov:
Is this how shared is supposed to work? If so, how is the
__gshared different from it? Does it not guarantee that the
result of a write is instantly visible to all threads? If so,
does this difference really matter?
shared and __gshared are very different things. __gshared
gua
Hi!
I'm puzzled with what's the difference between shared and
__gshared. Until now I've (mistakenly) considered that shared
variables are free from low-level data races. I.e. the operations
with shared data are atomic. And that __gshared is the "usual"
(in C++ sense) shared data.
So, in my
Am 10/06/2013 11:42, schrieb Elvis:
class A
{
enum TypeID = 1;
}
class B : A
{
enum TypeID = 2;
}
class C : A
{
enum TypeID = 3;
}
class D : B
{
enum TypeID = 4;
}
...
Could anybody shed some light on how to make these TypeIDs auto
increment at compile time?
Thats not
On Monday, 10 June 2013 at 09:46:42 UTC, snow wrote:
Hello,
I searched a lot in the docs and search, but couldn't find
anything so far. Is there a funtion, which converts my decimal
number into a binary?
I presume your decimal is in a string?
use
std.conv.parse
or
std.conv.to
On Monday, 10 June 2013 at 09:46:42 UTC, snow wrote:
Hello,
I searched a lot in the docs and search, but couldn't find
anything so far. Is there a funtion, which converts my decimal
number into a binary?
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_string.html#.format with format
string "%b".
Or if you're
Hello,
I searched a lot in the docs and search, but couldn't find
anything so far. Is there a funtion, which converts my decimal
number into a binary?
class A
{
enum TypeID = 1;
}
class B : A
{
enum TypeID = 2;
}
class C : A
{
enum TypeID = 3;
}
class D : B
{
enum TypeID = 4;
}
...
Could anybody shed some light on how to make these TypeIDs auto
increment at compile time?
Oh, i see, thanks.
P.S. туй васю нигодяй.
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/htuakrtvoyymappje...@forum.dlang.org
On Monday, 10 June 2013 at 02:02:09 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
UFCS chains are problematic when a symbol is ambiguous (eg
after import
std.stdio:write;import std.file:write);
I previously suggested to add the syntax
'arg1.(std.file.write)(arg2)'
(see 'support UFCS with fully qualified function n
23 matches
Mail list logo
