On Thursday, 12 September 2013 at 05:36:31 UTC, Alexandr
Druzhinin wrote:
Some C function malloc-ed memory. This memory should be freeed
much later. I don't want to manually call C function to free
this memory in some point later, so may I in some way ask gc to
free this memory using something
On 2013-09-11 10:06, monarch_dodra wrote:
I have a function that will *massively* benefit from having a persistent
internal buffer it can re-use (and grow) from call to call, instead of
re-allocating on every call.
What I don't want is either of:
1. To set a fixed limitation of size, if the
On Thursday, 12 September 2013 at 05:59:33 UTC, monarch_dodra
wrote:
On Thursday, 12 September 2013 at 05:36:31 UTC, Alexandr
Druzhinin wrote:
Some C function malloc-ed memory. This memory should be freeed
much later. I don't want to manually call C function to free
this memory in some point
12.09.2013 14:45, Rene Zwanenburg пишет:
On Thursday, 12 September 2013 at 05:59:33 UTC, monarch_dodra
wrote:
On Thursday, 12 September 2013 at 05:36:31 UTC, Alexandr Druzhinin wrote:
Some C function malloc-ed memory. This memory should be freeed much
later. I don't want to manually call C
On Wednesday, 11 September 2013 at 22:15:07 UTC, Rainer Schuetze
wrote:
On 11.09.2013 23:42, Lemonfiend wrote:
On Wednesday, 11 September 2013 at 20:36:39 UTC, Rainer
Schuetze wrote:
On 11.09.2013 18:13, Lemonfiend wrote:
Oops, I forgot to say what I actually did.
I added derelict to
Code:
import std.stdio;
class T1 {
protected:
void _apply() {
writeln(Call T1);
}
}
class T2 : T1 {
public:
override void _apply() {
writeln(Call T2);
}
}
class T3 : T1 {
protected:
override void _apply() {
Same with private, of course.
On Thursday, 12 September 2013 at 01:16:28 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On 9/12/2013 6:20 AM, Anton Alexeev wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 September 2013 at 11:06:04 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2013-09-10 11:04, Anton Alexeev wrote:
Can be but not libphobos2
Link statically with it, which is does by
On 2013-09-12 11:28, Namespace wrote:
But if I try to write 'override' before [1], I get this error message:
Error: function T4._apply cannot override a non-virtual function
This seems inconsistent. I really overwrite the method, and then I put
it in a package label.
I think the error
On 2013-09-12 12:14, Anton Alexeev wrote:
I've installed libcurl4-openssl-dev 7.29.0-1ubuntu3.1 before I asked for
help here. Else I can't even compile with that command: dmd -L-lphobos2
-L-lcurl test.d
How does your dmd.conf file look like?
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Thursday, 12 September 2013 at 11:29:22 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2013-09-12 11:28, Namespace wrote:
But if I try to write 'override' before [1], I get this error
message:
Error: function T4._apply cannot override a non-virtual
function
This seems inconsistent. I really overwrite the
On 2013-09-12 13:34, Namespace wrote:
Obvious. But what happend? Is the original _apply hidden?
If you call through an object of the same type, T4 in this case, the
method in the base class is hidden. If you call through a base class
reference, T1 in this case, the _apply method in the
On 2013-09-12 13:39, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
If you call through an object of the same type, T4 in this case, the
method in the base class is hidden. If you call through a base class
reference, T1 in this case, the _apply method in the subclass is hidden.
I'm guessing it's the same as
On Tuesday, 10 September 2013 at 16:58:54 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 06:50:03PM +0200, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 September 2013 at 16:45:33 UTC, H. S. Teoh
wrote:
but you can get rid of this with link-time optimization (on
Posix,
you'd add -L-gc-sections to your dmd
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 08:27:59AM +0200, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-09-11 10:06, monarch_dodra wrote:
I have a function that will *massively* benefit from having a
persistent internal buffer it can re-use (and grow) from call to
call, instead of re-allocating on every call.
What I don't
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 03:37:58PM +0200, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 September 2013 at 16:58:54 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 06:50:03PM +0200, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 September 2013 at 16:45:33 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
but you can get rid of this with link-time
On Thursday, 12 September 2013 at 13:58:03 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Interesting. However, I ran into some runtime segfaults caused
by
--gc-sections yesterday. I didn't investigate further, but that
makes me
hesitant to make --gc-sections the default. Something,
somewhere, is
being broken by
On Thursday, 12 September 2013 at 11:30:05 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2013-09-12 12:14, Anton Alexeev wrote:
I've installed libcurl4-openssl-dev 7.29.0-1ubuntu3.1 before I
asked for
help here. Else I can't even compile with that command: dmd
-L-lphobos2
-L-lcurl test.d
How does your
Hello. There was an issue 2 years ago:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/92
It seems that this bug is still here (I can't handle D Exception
from dll builded with dmd and dmc link).
Will this bug get fixed? Do other D compilers have the same issue?
On Thursday, 12 September 2013 at 11:29:22 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2013-09-12 11:28, Namespace wrote:
But if I try to write 'override' before [1], I get this error
message:
Error: function T4._apply cannot override a non-virtual
function
This seems inconsistent. I really overwrite the
12-Sep-2013 17:51, H. S. Teoh пишет:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 08:27:59AM +0200, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-09-11 10:06, monarch_dodra wrote:
I have a function that will *massively* benefit from having a
persistent internal buffer it can re-use (and grow) from call to
call, instead of
On Wednesday, 11 September 2013 at 18:24:31 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:16:42PM +0200, Gary Willoughby wrote:
Just wondered if i could pick you brains for a nice solution to
dynamically add methods to a class, paying particular
attention to
overloads. I'm currently
The documentation says the parameter tuple of a function,
delegate, or function pointer. This includes the parameter types,
names, and default values.
.. but what type is it?
Error: argument (int i, char c, string s, bool b = false) to
typeof is not an expression
How am I supposed to get
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 09:12:18PM +0200, bearophile wrote:
H. S. Teoh:
In phobos git HEAD, std.format has been made pure @safe nothrow (and
CTFE-able), so you should be able to write your assert as:
assert(condition, format(x = %s, blahblah, x));
With the latest DMD from updated
Daniel Davidson:
I am using Dart for code generation but would like to consider
D if I can find a convenient replacement for the following
declarative style:
Replacing Dart with D seems quite strange, such two languages
have so much different usage niches.
var dateRange =
On Thursday, 12 September 2013 at 19:46:21 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
I just upgraded my Linux distro (openSuse) and now when trying
to
compile a project with dub I am getting linking errors.
Compilation goes OK until the linking stage, when I get the
following:
Linking...
dmd
On Thursday, September 12, 2013 13:21:26 H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 04:07:24PM -0400, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, September 12, 2013 12:42:34 H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 09:12:18PM +0200, bearophile wrote:
H. S. Teoh:
In phobos git HEAD,
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:17:30PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 12/09/13 22:07, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
format can't be nothrow, because it throws when you screw up the
format specifiers. You have to wrap it in a try-catch block and
assert(0) in the catch block if you want to put
I haven't done any D coding since May, but picked up my little
toy code again now.
Last time I had a lot of hassle with not being able to
store/access symbols through templates, and I got the same thing
now.
Am I the only one hitting these all the time?
I'm basically playing around with
12-Sep-2013 20:51, H. S. Teoh пишет:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 07:50:25PM +0400, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
12-Sep-2013 17:51, H. S. Teoh пишет:
[...]
struct WeakPointer(T) {
enum size_t mask = 0xdeadbeef;
union Impl {
T* ptr;
H. S. Teoh:
In phobos git HEAD, std.format has been made pure @safe nothrow
(and
CTFE-able), so you should be able to write your assert as:
assert(condition, format(x = %s, blahblah, x));
With the latest DMD from updated GIT head:
import std.string: format;
void main() pure
On Thursday, September 12, 2013 12:42:34 H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 09:12:18PM +0200, bearophile wrote:
H. S. Teoh:
In phobos git HEAD, std.format has been made pure @safe nothrow (and
CTFE-able), so you should be able to write your assert as:
assert(condition, format(x
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 04:07:24PM -0400, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, September 12, 2013 12:42:34 H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 09:12:18PM +0200, bearophile wrote:
H. S. Teoh:
In phobos git HEAD, std.format has been made pure @safe nothrow
(and CTFE-able), so you
On Thursday, 12 September 2013 at 19:13:40 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
Double indirection? Allocate a class that has finalizer, hold
that via weak-ref. The wrapper in turn contains a pointer to
the buffer. The interesting point then is that one may allocate
said buffer via C's realloc.
Then
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 08:44:29PM +0200, simendsjo wrote:
The documentation says the parameter tuple of a function, delegate,
or function pointer. This includes the parameter types, names, and
default values.
.. but what type is it?
Error: argument (int i, char c, string s, bool b =
On Thursday, September 12, 2013 22:17:30 Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 12/09/13 22:07, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
format can't be nothrow, because it throws when you screw up the format
specifiers. You have to wrap it in a try-catch block and assert(0) in the
catch block if you want to put
On 2013-09-12 18:25, Anton Alexeev wrote:
[Environment]
DFLAGS=-I/usr/include/dmd/phobos -I/usr/include/dmd/druntime/import
-L-L/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu -L-L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
-L--no-warn-search-mismatch -L--export-dynamic
I don't see way explicitly linking with Phobos would make a
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 07:50:25PM +0400, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
12-Sep-2013 17:51, H. S. Teoh пишет:
[...]
struct WeakPointer(T) {
enum size_t mask = 0xdeadbeef;
union Impl {
T* ptr;
size_t uintVal;
}
On 2013-09-12 15:51, H. S. Teoh wrote:
The problem is, he wants to reuse the buffer next time if the GC hasn't
collected it yet.
I was thinking he could reuse the stack/static buffer. Basically using
two buffers, one static and one dynamic.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 12/09/13 22:07, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
format can't be nothrow, because it throws when you screw up the format
specifiers. You have to wrap it in a try-catch block and assert(0) in the catch
block if you want to put it in a nothrow function. std.datetime does this in
at least a few places.
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:13:30PM +0400, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
12-Sep-2013 20:51, H. S. Teoh пишет:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 07:50:25PM +0400, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
[...]
Better option is to have finalizer hooked up to set some flag. Then
_after_ restoring the pointer we consult that flag
I just upgraded my Linux distro (openSuse) and now when trying to
compile a project with dub I am getting linking errors.
Compilation goes OK until the linking stage, when I get the
following:
Linking...
dmd -of/home/craig/cloud/vibe-tiles/vibe
/home/craig/cloud/vibe-tiles/temp.o
On 12/09/13 20:49, H. S. Teoh wrote:
In phobos git HEAD, std.format has been made pure @safe nothrow (and
CTFE-able), so you should be able to write your assert as:
assert(condition, format(x = %s, blahblah, x));
Don't think it will work on 2.063.2, though, since it was a relatively
13-Sep-2013 00:11, H. S. Teoh пишет:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:13:30PM +0400, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
12-Sep-2013 20:51, H. S. Teoh пишет:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 07:50:25PM +0400, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
[...]
Better option is to have finalizer hooked up to set some flag. Then
_after_
On Thursday, 12 September 2013 at 19:41:26 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 08:44:29PM +0200, simendsjo wrote:
(...)
.. but what type is it?
Error: argument (int i, char c, string s, bool b = false) to
typeof
is not an expression
How am I supposed to get the parameter names
On Thursday, 12 September 2013 at 16:16:14 UTC, Maxim Fomin wrote:
On Thursday, 12 September 2013 at 11:29:22 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2013-09-12 11:28, Namespace wrote:
But if I try to write 'override' before [1], I get this error
message:
Error: function T4._apply cannot override a
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 08:13:37PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
Hi all,
Suppose that I want to insert some variable values into an assert
error message. The easy way to do this is something like:
assert(someCondition, text(x = , x, , cannot blah blah blah));
However, the
On 9/12/13, simendsjo simend...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks. I just ended up using both is(__parameters and
is(function to fetch the parameter names. Sometimes it seems
things are added to D without a very thorough design phase, but
then again, it starts with __, so I guess I'm on my own :)
Have
On Thursday, 12 September 2013 at 20:26:29 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
On Thursday, 12 September 2013 at 19:46:21 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
I just upgraded my Linux distro (openSuse) and now when trying
to
compile a project with dub I am getting linking errors.
Compilation goes OK until
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:40:06PM +0200, simendsjo wrote:
On Thursday, 12 September 2013 at 19:41:26 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 08:44:29PM +0200, simendsjo wrote:
(...)
.. but what type is it?
Error: argument (int i, char c, string s, bool b = false) to typeof
is not
On 12/09/13 22:23, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
You can put the try-catch in a version(assert) block to get around that
problem, but it is true that it's not exactly ideal. However, there really
isn't any way around that with a function that takes a format string unless
you want it to ignore bad
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:37:10PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 12/09/13 22:23, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
You can put the try-catch in a version(assert) block to get around
that problem, but it is true that it's not exactly ideal. However,
there really isn't any way around that with
On 09/12/2013 02:53 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
import std.range;
void main()
{
assert(isRandomAccessRange!(const(size_t[])));
}
results in an assertion error. This is a bug, no ... ?
That one is fine. You probably want a slice of const(size_t):
import std.range;
void
import std.range;
void main()
{
assert(isRandomAccessRange!(const(size_t[])));
}
results in an assertion error. This is a bug, no ... ?
On Thursday, 12 September 2013 at 20:07:40 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Thursday, September 12, 2013 12:42:34 H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 09:12:18PM +0200, bearophile wrote:
H. S. Teoh:
In phobos git HEAD, std.format has been made pure @safe
nothrow (and
CTFE-able), so
On Thursday, September 12, 2013 23:53:15 Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
import std.range;
void main()
{
assert(isRandomAccessRange!(const(size_t[])));
}
results in an assertion error. This is a bug, no ... ?
Nope. It's correct. Because it's const, you can't call popFront on it or
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 03:12:48PM -0700, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 09/12/2013 02:53 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
import std.range;
void main()
{
assert(isRandomAccessRange!(const(size_t[])));
}
results in an assertion error. This is a bug, no ... ?
That one is fine. You
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:45:07PM +0200, Meta wrote:
On Thursday, 12 September 2013 at 20:07:40 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
[...]
format can't be nothrow, because it throws when you screw up the
format specifiers. You have to wrap it in a try-catch block and
assert(0) in the catch block if
On 9/12/13, Joseph Rushton Wakeling joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote:
import std.range;
void main()
{
assert(isRandomAccessRange!(const(size_t[])));
}
results in an assertion error. This is a bug, no ... ?
I think ranges have to be non-const. I mean how can you iterate over
On 13/09/13 00:15, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Nope. It's correct. Because it's const, you can't call popFront on it or any
of the other mutating range operations. So, it's not a valid range.
D'oh! :-P
I gave the assert as an example, but this one snuck up on me rather unexpectedly
-- I'd got a
On Friday, September 13, 2013 00:46:20 Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 13/09/13 00:15, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Nope. It's correct. Because it's const, you can't call popFront on it or
any of the other mutating range operations. So, it's not a valid range.
D'oh! :-P
I gave the assert as
On Thursday, 12 September 2013 at 22:04:20 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Currently, this is not possible, because the format string may
be a runtime-computed value. For example:
...
When you don't have a runtime computed format string, though
(which is
generally the case for my code, at least),
62 matches
Mail list logo
