On Friday, 13 December 2013 at 18:01:53 UTC, Rémy Mouëza wrote:
It works fine when using dup to the value returned by
nativeToBigEndian:
public void opAssign(uint value)
{
this._octets = value.nativeToBigEndian().dup;
assert(this._octets == cast (ubyte[]) [1, 2, 3,
On Friday, 13 December 2013 at 14:52:32 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
Am Thu, 12 Dec 2013 08:43:35 -0800
schrieb H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx:
I do this with my own ranges sometimes. Sometimes, it's more
performant
to precompute the value of .front and store it (as .front),
and have
.popFront
On Saturday, 14 December 2013 at 15:26:36 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
On Friday, 13 December 2013 at 14:52:32 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
Most non-trivial ranges do the actual work in `popFront()' and
return a cached value from `front'. It has been argued as a
design quirk, that this in general leads
the std.algorithm.splitter returns a blank or null (eg a null
string ) between two consecuting delimeters.
for example, splitting hello world (two spaces between words)
will return [hello , , world]
is there an improoved version of it, which wont return such a
blank/null when multiple
And now try -inline-threshold=1024 ;-)
Reading -help-hidden sometimes helps.
Thanks. It is really game changer. I get my words about ranges
back.
On Saturday, 14 December 2013 at 16:00:06 UTC, seany wrote:
the std.algorithm.splitter returns a blank or null (eg a null
string ) between two consecuting delimeters.
for example, splitting hello world (two spaces between
words) will return [hello , , world]
is there an improoved version
seany:
for example, splitting hello world (two spaces between
words) will return [hello , , world]
It's a bug.
Bye,
bearophile
Am Sat, 14 Dec 2013 08:43:42 +0100
schrieb Benji romanbeno...@gmail.com:
On Saturday, 14 December 2013 at 00:15:30 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
Am Fri, 13 Dec 2013 21:40:10 +0100
schrieb Benji romanbeno...@gmail.com:
I got two errors mentioned above at once.. :(
What the heck is happening
Am Sat, 14 Dec 2013 17:41:22 +0100
schrieb bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com:
seany:
for example, splitting hello world (two spaces between
words) will return [hello , , world]
It's a bug.
Bye,
bearophile
Not at all, the documentation explicitly states:
Am Sat, 14 Dec 2013 16:38:20 +0100
schrieb Joseph Rushton Wakeling
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net:
On Saturday, 14 December 2013 at 15:26:36 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
On Friday, 13 December 2013 at 14:52:32 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
Most non-trivial ranges do the actual work in `popFront()' and
Marco Leise:
Not at all, the documentation explicitly states:
assert(equal(splitter(hello world, ' '), [ hello, ,
world ]));
I didn't see the ' ' in the OP code, sorry.
A test:
void main() {
import std.stdio, std.string, std.algorithm;
auto s = hello world;
On Friday, 13 December 2013 at 17:35:27 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Friday, 13 December 2013 at 16:37:51 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
I have the following code which is massively simplified from a
larger type. The problem occurs between assigning the value to
the type and retrieving it.
The
My question is hopefully short and straightforward to answer, but
it's also a two-parter.
I am working on a template that generates a function that
implements an algorithm using several helper functions that are
provided to the template by the user. I would like to add
constraints to the
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 4:10 AM, comco void.unsig...@gmail.com wrote:
Imagine a world in which a simple 'if' has the semantics of a static if, if
the condition is evaluable at CT. Is this a world you would rather live in?
Even so, I would still want static if, so that I would get a compile
time
14-Dec-2013 21:20, bearophile пишет:
Marco Leise:
Not at all, the documentation explicitly states:
assert(equal(splitter(hello world, ' '), [ hello, , world ]));
I didn't see the ' ' in the OP code, sorry.
A test:
void main() {
import std.stdio, std.string, std.algorithm;
On 12/14/2013 11:53 AM, DoctorCaptain wrote: My question is hopefully
short and straightforward to answer, but it's
also a two-parter.
I am working on a template that generates a function that implements an
algorithm using several helper functions that are provided to the
template by the
On 2013-12-14 20:53, DoctorCaptain wrote:
Second, can I get the level of thoroughness I am going for in these
constraints checks with fewer actual checks? As in, is there a more
straightforward way to do these checks without sacrificing any of them?
Thank you for any and all insight!
I would
Most uses of the 'is expression' allows using a specifier to
name the entity that matched. So, inserting ReturnedDelegate in
your '== delegate' line gives the name ReturnedDelegate to the
delegate.
That name can be used further:
template exT(T, alias nextGen)
if (
// Ensure
On 12/13/2013 04:24 PM, Andrea Fontana wrote:
Just another thought. If we have:
class B;
struct C;
class A
{
void method() const { ... }
B another_class;
C a_struct;
}
B is just a reference to a object, so method() should not reassign it.
The reference should be const,
On 12/13/2013 04:30 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
There's some discussion that auto might strip off the top level
const where it is otherwise allowed, but I'm not sure if that's
actually going to happen or not.
Ah. I was about to respond by that top level const is silly but I now
see that it is
On Friday, December 13, 2013 01:17:41 Jonathan M Davis wrote:
or you could do something like
auto cstr = str.dup.ptr;
Wait. That was stupid of me. Don't do this. It'll give you a char*, but it
won't be null-terminated. If you need char*, then use toUTFz!(char*) - though
from what Mike's
I have just moved to Windows 8.1 64bit. I copied the dmd compiler
and environment I was using on the 32 bit XP and hooked up the
environmental variables to see what would happen. When I come to
compile and run one of the Derelict3 programs it compiles and
runs ok (mouse isn't doing what it
On 12/14/2013 10:48 AM, Gary Willoughby wrote:
On Friday, 13 December 2013 at 17:35:27 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
public void opAssign(uint value)
{
this._octets = value.nativeToBigEndian();
assert(this._octets == [1, 2, 3, 4]);
}
}
opAssign is escaping a
On Sunday, 15 December 2013 at 00:10:20 UTC, Stephen Jones wrote:
I have just moved to Windows 8.1 64bit. I copied the dmd
compiler and environment I was using on the 32 bit XP and
hooked up the environmental variables to see what would happen.
When I come to compile and run one of the
Am Sat, 14 Dec 2013 18:20:13 +0100
schrieb bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com:
Marco Leise:
Not at all, the documentation explicitly states:
assert(equal(splitter(hello world, ' '), [ hello, ,
world ]));
I didn't see the ' ' in the OP code, sorry.
A test:
void main() {
On Sunday, 15 December 2013 at 00:10:20 UTC, Stephen Jones wrote:
Also, what is the deal with using dlls from a 32bit system on a
64bit os; is this just backwards compatibility?
Any help or helpful links appreciated.
32bit code runs on 64bit platforms (you can thank AMD for that,
as Linux
Am Sun, 15 Dec 2013 01:10:18 +0100
schrieb Stephen Jones siwe...@gmail.com:
I would assume, and please tell me if I am wrong as that is the
point of the post, that any D code will compile on any dmd
compiler irrespective of whether 32 or 64 bit. But I would have
thought the object files
Alright, so I'm trying to do hex string to integer conversion,
but I can't for the live of me find how to do exponent
calculation in D. Java has a Math.pow() function that allows you
to specify the base and the exponent, but all I've seen in D's
libraries are functions that allow you to only
On Sunday, 15 December 2013 at 05:22:47 UTC, Malkierian wrote:
Alright, so I'm trying to do hex string to integer conversion,
but I can't for the live of me find how to do exponent
calculation in D. Java has a Math.pow() function that allows
you to specify the base and the exponent, but all
On 12/14/2013 09:22 PM, Malkierian wrote:
Alright, so I'm trying to do hex string to integer conversion, but I
can't for the live of me find how to do exponent calculation in D. Java
has a Math.pow() function that allows you to specify the base and the
exponent, but all I've seen in D's
On 12/14/13 8:22 PM, Malkierian wrote:
Alright, so I'm trying to do hex string to integer conversion, but I
can't for the live of me find how to do exponent calculation in D. Java
has a Math.pow() function that allows you to specify the base and the
exponent, but all I've seen in D's libraries
On Sunday, 15 December 2013 at 05:39:03 UTC, Nathan M. Swan wrote:
On 12/14/13 8:22 PM, Malkierian wrote:
Alright, so I'm trying to do hex string to integer conversion,
but I
can't for the live of me find how to do exponent calculation
in D. Java
has a Math.pow() function that allows you to
I have 3 comments (if you're still reading this thread :) )
First, you could let nextGen determine the return type. Since the
template know that nextGen returns an int delegate(int), there is no
need for the user to provide the 'int' parameter.
So user code could become:
void main(string[]
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_math.html#.pow
See the fourth overload: `if (isFloatingPoint!F isFloatingPoint!G)`.
Is there any difference between using `a ^^ b` and `pow(a,b)`?
34 matches
Mail list logo
