On Monday, 24 March 2014 at 05:44:37 UTC, Igor wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 February 2012 at 07:35:26 UTC, Gour wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:37:20 +0100
bioinfornatics bioinfornat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Maybe send a pull request to main cmake repo will be better.
It is
always better to put
On Sunday, 23 March 2014 at 12:37:34 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Friday, 21 March 2014 at 09:56:49 UTC, Chris wrote:
Btw, I was initially inspired by Objective-C's NSSet that can
hold arbitrary objects.
That's because Objective-C's objects are references. It would
be equivalent to Adam
On Sunday, 23 March 2014 at 22:00:23 UTC, andro wrote:
On Tuesday, 18 March 2014 at 23:52:49 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
Does GDC and/or LDC have sparc solaris backend support?
I'm trying to make my company use D and we have a bunch of
legacy machines that unfortunately run on sparc-solaris 2.10.
On Sunday, 23 March 2014 at 18:28:18 UTC, Jay Norwood wrote:
On Sunday, 23 March 2014 at 17:30:20 UTC, bearophile wrote:
The task didn't ask for a computationally efficient solution
:-) So you are measuring something that was not optimized for.
So there's lot of variance.
Bye,
bearophile
I see that ranges is primitive to organzie universal approach to
write some algorithms. But I'm using algorithms from the library
but I still can't start with writing my own algorithms based on
ranges. For example I have the following function written without
ranges. I want to improve it and
On Monday, 24 March 2014 at 12:13:43 UTC, Uranuz wrote:
I see that ranges is primitive to organzie universal approach
to write some algorithms. But I'm using algorithms from the
library but I still can't start with writing my own algorithms
based on ranges. For example I have the following
Very nice example. I'll test on ubuntu later.
On windows ...
D:\diamond\diamond\diamond\Releasediamond 1 nul
brad: time: 19544[ms]
printDiamond1: time: 1139[ms]
printDiamond2: time: 1656[ms]
printDiamond3: time: 663[ms]
jay1: time: 455[ms]
sergei: time: 11673[ms]
jay2: time: 411[ms]
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 06:28:52 -0400, Infiltrator lt.infiltra...@gmail.com
wrote:
So, following on from monarchdodra's comment [0] in the bug tracker, how
exactly should inout work? For example, should the following work?
import
Have you read this: http://ddili.org/ders/d.en/ranges.html ?
Yes I have read it. It's difficult to formulate the question in
English bu I'l try. In this example I searching for special
symbols '' and '='. So when symbol found I use *save* method of
range to remember start of *name* or
I have another question. For example I have some range with input
data (for example some array). I using method popFront() to
iterate to next element. Then with property front I check element
if it has some value. Then I *save* it. But how could I get
position of this derived range in original
On Thursday, 20 March 2014 at 21:25:03 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
This is a somewhat common little exercise:
if you like similar puzzles, here is another:
Write a program that expects a 10-by-10 matrix from standard
input. The program should compute sum of each row and each column
and print
On Monday, 24 March 2014 at 14:12:58 UTC, Uranuz wrote:
Have you read this: http://ddili.org/ders/d.en/ranges.html ?
Yes I have read it. It's difficult to formulate the question in
English bu I'l try. In this example I searching for special
symbols '' and '='. So when symbol found I use
Is there a standard way to parse hex strings into numbers?
I have the following returned as a string:
0xac036f90
Is there a standard way to parse this into a ulong or do you just
roll your own?
On Monday, 24 March 2014 at 16:30:37 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
Is there a standard way to parse hex strings into numbers?
I have the following returned as a string:
0xac036f90
Is there a standard way to parse this into a ulong or do you
just roll your own?
To accepts a radix
Hello,
I have some piece of code that compiles and runs fine:
void main(string[] args)
{
int a = 7;
int delegate() dg = { return a + 3; };
auto result = dg();
writeln(result);
}
Now I want the closure (aka delegate) to have a closure variable:
int a = 7;
On Monday, 24 March 2014 at 16:40:55 UTC, Bienlein wrote:
Now I want the closure (aka delegate) to have a closure
variable:
int a = 7;
int delegate(int) dg = { value = return value + a + 3; };
auto result = dg(123);
Unhappily, the code above doesn't compile. Tried various
things, looked for
Hello!
You just missed the syntax a little.
Instead of:
int delegate(int) dg = { value = return value + a + 3; };
You can write
auto dg = (int value) { return value + a + 3; }; // Omitted return
type, but had to specify type of value.
or
auto dg = (int value) = value + a + 3; //
On Monday, 24 March 2014 at 16:35:42 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Monday, 24 March 2014 at 16:30:37 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
Is there a standard way to parse hex strings into numbers?
I have the following returned as a string:
0xac036f90
Is there a standard way to parse this
On Monday, 24 March 2014 at 05:32:30 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Sunday, 23 March 2014 at 20:12:38 UTC, nrgyzer wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm experimenting with sockets and having trouble to detect
when the remote side closes the connection. Here's my code:
// Client:
module client;
import
On Monday, 24 March 2014 at 01:34:22 UTC, Matej Nanut wrote:
Hello!
You can implement static functions that act like members, like
so:
---
void myFunc(MyClass c) { ... }
---
Which you will be able to call like:
---
auto c = new MyClass();
c.myFunc();
---
because of uniform function call
On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:02:25 -0400, MarisaLovesUsAll maru...@2ch.hk
wrote:
On Monday, 24 March 2014 at 01:34:22 UTC, Matej Nanut wrote:
Hello!
You can implement static functions that act like members, like so:
---
void myFunc(MyClass c) { ... }
---
Which you will be able to call like:
Any alternatives??
I moved cmaked2 to github [1], updated and simplified the usage a
little (system cmake patch not necessary anymore). You can give
it a try. Dub registry support is also on the way.
Regards
Dragos
[1] - https://github.com/dcarp/cmake-d
On 3/24/14, 4:55 PM, Dragos Carp wrote:
Any alternatives??
I moved cmaked2 to github [1], updated and simplified the usage a
little (system cmake patch not necessary anymore). You can give
it a try. Dub registry support is also on the way.
Regards
Dragos
[1] -
On Monday, 24 March 2014 at 23:55:14 UTC, Dragos Carp wrote:
Any alternatives??
I moved cmaked2 to github [1], updated and simplified the usage
a
little (system cmake patch not necessary anymore). You can give
it a try. Dub registry support is also on the way.
Regards
Dragos
[1] -
On Monday, 24 March 2014 at 23:55:14 UTC, Dragos Carp wrote:
Any alternatives??
I moved cmaked2 to github [1], updated and simplified the usage
a
little (system cmake patch not necessary anymore). You can give
it a try. Dub registry support is also on the way.
Regards
Dragos
[1] -
not through yet with the diamond. This one is a little faster.
Appending the newline to the stars and calculating the slice
backward from the end would save a w.put for the newlines ...
probably faster. I keep looking for a way to create a dynamic
array of a specific size, filled with the
I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong... the following code prints
nothing:
void main()
{
import std.stdio, std.range;
string str = asdf;
auto sink = new dchar[](str.length);
auto fun = (dchar c) { sink.put(c); };
foreach (dchar c; str)
{
fun(c);
}
On 03/24/2014 07:42 PM, Meta wrote:
I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong... the following code prints nothing:
void main()
{
import std.stdio, std.range;
string str = asdf;
auto sink = new dchar[](str.length);
auto fun = (dchar c) { sink.put(c); };
foreach (dchar
These were times on ubuntu. I may have printed debug build times
previously, but these are dmd release build. I gave up trying to
figure out how to build ldc on ubuntu. The dmd one click
installer is much appreciated.
brad: time: 12425[ms]
printDiamond1: time: 380[ms]
printDiamond2: time:
29 matches
Mail list logo
