For reasons I won't go into (but should be fairly obvious), I am trying
to write code that does not rely on the garbage collector. As such, I'm
using reference counting structs allocated on a pool.
To keep things sane, I'm trying to use RAII semantics, and to that end,
a smart pointer that
just checked this with gdc and dmd head. interesting that
a = a.init;
works the same in gdc and in dmd: just calls destructors for structs.
but doing
a[] = S.init
works different. gdc does the same as in the first case: just calling
destructors for all array elements. but dmd head calls
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 07:31:34 UTC, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
For reasons I won't go into (but should be fairly obvious), I
am trying to write code that does not rely on the garbage
collector. As such, I'm using reference counting structs
allocated on a pool.
To keep things sane, I'm
On Saturday, 25 October 2014 at 22:16:12 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Saturday, 25 October 2014 at 21:52:13 UTC, MachineCode wrote:
Where is a variable declared in a module allocated? is it same
as a C's global?
for example:
module foo;
int myvar;
that is in thread local storage.
__shared,
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:11:33 +
Szymon Gatner via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com wrote:
You have created dynamic array of SmartPtrs.
nope. it's stack-allocated array.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 09:21:14 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:11:33 +
Szymon Gatner via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com wrote:
You have created dynamic array of SmartPtrs.
nope. it's stack-allocated array.
Right, sorry.
On Sunday, 26 October 2014 at 20:38:29 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
On Friday, 24 October 2014 at 22:29:12 UTC, Peter Alexander
wrote:
Further, I would like to extend isPalindrome() with a minimum
length argument minLength that for string and wstring does
I extended my algorithm with a minLength
On 27/10/14 11:31, Szymon Gatner wrote:
Right, sorry. Tho I admit I made assumptions since that was not the full
code.
I've opened a bug. It has a fully contained sample (that does not, in
fact, implement smartptr).
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13661
On 10/26/14 7:13 PM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 22:53:07 +
Neven via Digitalmars-d-learn digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com wrote:
Why cannot I globally have auto mutex = new Mutex? And why it
works now when I put __gshared?
this is because 'auto mutex = new
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:24:13 -0400
Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com wrote:
Just as a followup, for some reason Mutex is not callable as a shared
object, so you have to make it __gshared.
that's due to difference betwen plain type and shared type.
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:24:13 -0400
Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com wrote:
Just as a followup, for some reason Mutex is not callable as a shared
object, so you have to make it __gshared.
This is unfortunate, but it is the only way to do it right
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 12:40:17 UTC, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
On 27/10/14 11:31, Szymon Gatner wrote:
Right, sorry. Tho I admit I made assumptions since that was
not the full
code.
I've opened a bug. It has a fully contained sample (that does
not, in fact, implement smartptr).
On 10/27/14 9:34 AM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:24:13 -0400
Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com wrote:
Just as a followup, for some reason Mutex is not callable as a shared
object, so you have to make it __gshared.
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 12:10:59 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
You could add an early `return false;` if the range has length
and it is less than minLength.
See update :)
Thanks!
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 14:04:53 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 12:40:17 UTC, Shachar Shemesh
wrote:
On 27/10/14 11:31, Szymon Gatner wrote:
Right, sorry. Tho I admit I made assumptions since that was
not the full
code.
I've opened a bug. It has a fully
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 16:58:56 UTC, Szymon Gatner wrote:
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 14:04:53 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 12:40:17 UTC, Shachar Shemesh
wrote:
On 27/10/14 11:31, Szymon Gatner wrote:
Right, sorry. Tho I admit I made assumptions since that
On Monday, October 27, 2014 09:24:13 Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
Just as a followup, for some reason Mutex is not callable as a shared
object, so you have to make it __gshared.
This is unfortunate, but it is the only way to do it right now. Because
an actual mutex is
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 16:59:19 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 12:10:59 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
You could add an early `return false;` if the range has length
and it is less than minLength.
See update :)
Thanks!
And you can return true if length = 1
Why
Howdy,
I stumbled across a tiny NES emulator written in C++
(http://bisqwit.iki.fi/jutut/kuvat/programming_examples/nesemu1/nesemu1.cc)
that I feel compelled to make even tinier with some D magic. I am
having trouble with a nested template in the code.
The C++ code:
// Bitfield utilities
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 22:43:22 +, John wrote:
void opAssign(T2 val)
Without looking at the rest of your code, looks like this line needs to be
void opAssign(T2)(T2 val)
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 21:28:17 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
And you can return true if length = 1
Thanks.
Why bidirectional range only?
popBack() only for
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_range.html#isBidirectionalRange
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 22:43:23 UTC, John wrote:
The C++ code:
// Bitfield utilities
templateunsigned bitno, unsigned nbits=1, typename T=u8
struct RegBit
{
[...]
templatetypename T2
RegBit operator=(T2 val)
[...]
};
My D implementation thus far:
[...]
template RegBit(uint
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 23:19:42 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 22:43:23 UTC, John wrote:
The C++ code:
// Bitfield utilities
templateunsigned bitno, unsigned nbits=1, typename T=u8
struct RegBit
{
[...]
templatetypename T2
RegBit operator=(T2 val)
[...]
};
Hey all,
I've been playing around w/ D for a little while, and figured I
would dive more into it with some side project stuff that has
come up at work. The interface I am hooking up to is a zmq
server, so I created a dub.json file ~ as follows:
{
dependencies: {
zeromq: ~master,
Hi,
I've written a modest shared library in D that I'd like to call
directly from a Python web server (Linux/OS X, Apache, WSGI,
Pyramid). I can call it reliably from within Python unit tests
but on a running server, the library causes a SIGSEGV as soon as
I try anything as complicated as a
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 23:56:11 UTC, Evan Lowry wrote:
../../.dub/packages/zeromq-master/deimos/zmq/zmq.d(96): Error:
function deimos.zmq.zmq.zmq_strerror without 'this' cannot be
const
You found a bug in the binding.
Line 96 of zmq.d [1]: const char* zmq_strerror(int errnum);
Should
Hello !
I'm not sure if I'm missing something here but for a tagged enum
it doesn't seem to make sense to forbid reserved keywords like:
enum CrudOps {read, write, delete}
The dmd compiler are complaining:
--
cte.d(4): Error: basic type expected, not delete
cte.d(4): Error: no identifier
On Tuesday, October 28, 2014 00:31:43 Domingo via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
Hello !
I'm not sure if I'm missing something here but for a tagged enum
it doesn't seem to make sense to forbid reserved keywords like:
enum CrudOps {read, write, delete}
The dmd compiler are complaining:
--
On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 00:31:43 +
Domingo via Digitalmars-d-learn digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com
wrote:
Hello !
I'm not sure if I'm missing something here but for a tagged enum
it doesn't seem to make sense to forbid reserved keywords like:
enum CrudOps {read, write, delete}
The
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:31:43AM +, Domingo via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
Hello !
I'm not sure if I'm missing something here but for a tagged enum it
doesn't seem to make sense to forbid reserved keywords like:
enum CrudOps {read, write, delete}
The dmd compiler are complaining:
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 00:21:20 UTC, anonymous wrote:
Line 96 of zmq.d [1]: const char* zmq_strerror(int errnum);
Should be: const(char)* zmq_strerror(int errnum);
Yep, this seemed to do the trick cleanly. S'all compiling and the
examples provided in the repo run. Can submit a pull
On 10/27/2014 09:02 PM, Evan Lowry wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 00:21:20 UTC, anonymous wrote:
Line 96 of zmq.d [1]: const char* zmq_strerror(int errnum);
Should be: const(char)* zmq_strerror(int errnum);
Yep, this seemed to do the trick cleanly. S'all compiling and the examples
Cheap Kitchens in North London. Thirty Ex Display Kitchens To
Clear. w w w. e x d i s p l a y k i t c h e n s 1. c o. u k £ 595
Each with appliances.Tel 01616-694785
33 matches
Mail list logo
