On 2014-10-28 01:51, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
And I've never seen a language where it did (though one may exist out there
somewhere)
Ruby:
class Foo
end
Foo == Foo.new.class # perfectly legal
You always need to have a receiver when calling the class method. This
is
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 18:42:11 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 16:58:56 UTC, Szymon Gatner wrote:
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 14:04:53 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 12:40:17 UTC, Shachar Shemesh
wrote:
On 27/10/14 11:31, Szymon Gatner
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 00:16:03 UTC, John McFarlane wrote:
Hi,
I've written a modest shared library in D that I'd like to call
directly from a Python web server (Linux/OS X, Apache, WSGI,
Pyramid). I can call it reliably from within Python unit tests
but on a running server, the
On Sunday, 26 October 2014 at 06:20:45 UTC, Suliman wrote:
Unfortunately that library has no dub package.
But you can include it in your project.
See info here http://code.dlang.org/package-format
I can't understand how to set in dub that I need to to include
in compilation process other
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 08:36:07 UTC, Szymon Gatner wrote:
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 18:42:11 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 16:58:56 UTC, Szymon Gatner
wrote:
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 14:04:53 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 00:21:20 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 23:56:11 UTC, Evan Lowry wrote:
../../.dub/packages/zeromq-master/deimos/zmq/zmq.d(96): Error:
function deimos.zmq.zmq.zmq_strerror without 'this' cannot be
const
You found a bug in the binding.
Line
Hi,
I don't know if I'm missing something but I did some tests with
the popFront and popBack version:
bool isPalindrome(R)(R range)
if (isBidirectionalRange!(R))
{
while (!range.empty){
if (range.front != range.back) return false;
range.popFront();
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 11:48:37 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
And in my benchmark test, the first version is 3x slower than
the second one.
I forgot to say that I'm compiling with DMD without any compiler
hints/optimizations.
Matheus.
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 22:53:57 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
Why bidirectional range only?
popBack() only for
I mean: you should write a different version for
non-bidirectional ranges too :)
On 10/27/14 8:31 PM, Domingo wrote:
Hello !
I'm not sure if I'm missing something here but for a tagged enum it
doesn't seem to make sense to forbid reserved keywords like:
enum CrudOps {read, write, delete}
The dmd compiler are complaining:
--
cte.d(4): Error: basic type expected, not
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 11:51:42 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
I forgot to say that I'm compiling with DMD without any
compiler hints/optimizations.
Try compiling with DMD flag
-release
and perhaps also
-release -noboundscheck
to get relevant results.
DMD is currently not that good at
Has there been any proposals/plans to make operator in work for
elements in ranges such as
assert('x' in ['x']);
I'm missing that Python feature when I work in D.
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 13:30:05 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 11:51:42 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
I forgot to say that I'm compiling with DMD without any
compiler hints/optimizations.
Try compiling with DMD flag
-release
and perhaps also
-release -noboundscheck
to
On 10/28/14 9:50 AM, Nordlöw wrote:
Has there been any proposals/plans to make operator in work for
elements in ranges such as
assert('x' in ['x']);
I'm missing that Python feature when I work in D.
No. The implication of 'in' for AAs is that it is a fast, O(lgn) or
better, operation.
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 13:50:24 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
Has there been any proposals/plans to make operator in work
for elements in ranges such as
assert('x' in ['x']);
I'm missing that Python feature when I work in D.
There is also something similar in Pascal, at the language
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 14:06:27 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
No. The implication of 'in' for AAs is that it is a fast,
O(lgn) or better, operation. Your assertion requires O(n)
performance.
What about making it work for (builtin) tuples? Then it could be
make use of a variadic
Hello,
I am mixing some of my existing C code with D via static linking.
I can access C globals from D using __gshared but I cannot seem
to be able to access a D global from within the C code. Keep in
mind I am a novice programmer. Everything is built with gcc and
gdc under Linux.
e.g.
//D
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 14:09:50 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
Now with: -release -noboundscheck they are equal and sometimes
your version is slightly faster by ~3 milliseconds.
That is great to hear!
You should try profiling with ldc aswell.
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 14:09:50 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 13:30:05 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 11:51:42 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
I forgot to say that I'm compiling with DMD without any
compiler hints/optimizations.
Try compiling with DMD
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 15:11:01 UTC, Baz wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 13:50:24 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
Has there been any proposals/plans to make operator in work
for elements in ranges such as
assert('x' in ['x']);
I'm missing that Python feature when I work in D.
There is
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 15:24:03 UTC, Thad wrote:
Hello,
I am mixing some of my existing C code with D via static
linking. I can access C globals from D using __gshared but I
cannot seem to be able to access a D global from within the C
code. Keep in mind I am a novice programmer.
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 00:51:17 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d-learn
The
thing that's been done in Phobos in this type of situation is
to put an
underscore on the end of the keyword, so you'd get
enum CrudOps { read, write, delete_ }
and while that may not be what you want,
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 16:42:20 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 15:24:03 UTC, Thad wrote:
Hello,
I am mixing some of my existing C code with D via static
linking. I can access C globals from D using __gshared but I
cannot seem to be able to access a D global
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 19:13:13 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
The reason that it's not shared is because Sean Kelly didn't
want to make
much of anything in druntime shared until shared was better
ironed out, which
keeps getting talked about but never done.
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 16:32:13 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 15:11:01 UTC, Baz wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 13:50:24 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
Has there been any proposals/plans to make operator in work
for elements in ranges such as
assert('x' in
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 17:50:30 UTC, Baz wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 16:32:13 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 15:11:01 UTC, Baz wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 13:50:24 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
Has there been any proposals/plans to make operator in
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 18:29:49 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
It always was the argument against generalizing `in` to arrays.
`in` is not alone in this respect. It's also expected that
indexing and slicing be cheap operations.
BTW: Does anybody have an efficient unordered set container
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 18:29:49 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 17:50:30 UTC, Baz wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 16:32:13 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 15:11:01 UTC, Baz wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 13:50:24 UTC, Nordlöw
On 10/28/14 2:33 PM, Nordlöw wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 18:29:49 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
It always was the argument against generalizing `in` to arrays. `in`
is not alone in this respect. It's also expected that indexing and
slicing be cheap operations.
BTW: Does anybody have an
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 14:06:27 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 10/28/14 9:50 AM, Nordlöw wrote:
Has there been any proposals/plans to make operator in work
for
elements in ranges such as
assert('x' in ['x']);
…
Your assertion requires O(n) performance.
It is O(ln(n)) on
On 10/28/14 3:45 PM, Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 14:06:27 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 10/28/14 9:50 AM, Nordlöw wrote:
Has there been any proposals/plans to make operator in work for
elements in ranges
On Tuesday, October 28, 2014 16:58:50 Gary Willoughby via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 00:51:17 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d-learn
The
thing that's been done in Phobos in this type of situation is
to put an
underscore on the end of the keyword,
On Tuesday, October 28, 2014 18:38:18 via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
To answer your question: Computational (or memory) complexity is
not an implementation detail, because it has a very noticeable
effect. Therefore, one should not hide an O(n) or worse operation
behind a harmless looking
I'm trying to write (in DMD) the assembler that handles the function :
__m256i _mm256_permute4x64_epi64(__m256i a, in int M);
This translates to vpermq
The closest thing I could find in DMD assembly is VPERMILPS, which is
called with:
asm { vpermilps YMM0, YMM1, IMM8; }
However, I cannot
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 19:24:00 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
https://github.com/schveiguy/dcollections/blob/master/dcollections/HashSet.d
-Steve
Thanks!
On Tuesday, 28 October 2014 at 21:05:15 UTC, Etienne wrote:
I'm trying to write (in DMD) the assembler that handles the
function :
__m256i _mm256_permute4x64_epi64(__m256i a, in int M);
This translates to vpermq
The closest thing I could find in DMD assembly is VPERMILPS,
which is called
imm8 is not a register. imm stands for immediate, i.e. a
constant, hard-coded value. E.g.:
asm { vpermilps YMM0, YMM1, 0 /* no idea what would be a
meaningful value */; }
Oh, well, that makes sense. This means I should use string mixins to
insert the actual value.
I couldn't run AVX2
I'm trying to compile my D code using LDC and hopefully used by
my iOS program in Xcode.
So I did some research
(correct me if I'm wrong)
If I compile my D code using LDC into static file and used by my
iOS app and since they have the same compiler backend, are they
binary compatible?
If it
It looks like dub fetch... is putting all packages at %appdata%
path on my windows machine. Is there a way to redirect packages
to a user specified path?
39 matches
Mail list logo
