I found the solution. A problem in different structures of FILE
for MSVC and DMC. I take the pointer on structure of FILE from
CrtDLL.dll
Everything works!
// MGW 07.05.15
import core.runtime; // Загрузка DLL Для Win
import std.stdio;// writeln
version(Windows) {
import
On Mon, 08 Jun 2015 18:16:57 +
Anonymouse via Digitalmars-d-learn digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com wrote:
On Monday, 8 June 2015 at 11:44:47 UTC, Daniel Kozák wrote:
No difference even with GC.disable() results are same.
Profile! Callgrind is your friend~
Yep, but I dont care, I am
Is there any reasons/difficulties for not implementing named
parameters?
There is clearly a need:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/wokfqqbexazcguffw...@forum.dlang.org#post-pxndhoskpjxvnoacajaz:40forum.dlang.org
On Monday, 8 June 2015 at 18:48:17 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
Yep, but I dont care, I am the one who makes transcode faster,
so I am happy
with results :P.
P.S. I care and probably when I have some spare time I will
improve to!dstring too
Ah, so you are. I confused you with Kadir Erdem Demir.
On Monday, 8 June 2015 at 13:37:40 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Monday, 8 June 2015 at 12:24:56 UTC, Oleg B wrote:
I guess you should follow andrei's post about new allocators!
Can you get link to this post?
These are some of his posts:
On Monday, June 08, 2015 20:36:05 Yuxuan Shui via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
Is there any reasons/difficulties for not implementing named
parameters?
There is clearly a need:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/wokfqqbexazcguffw...@forum.dlang.org#post-pxndhoskpjxvnoacajaz:40forum.dlang.org
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 12:08 AM, Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com wrote:
The easiest way is to not use search paths, and instead pass all the
modules you want compiled to the compiler directly. Then it will look for
the module name declaration instead of
On Monday, 8 June 2015 at 20:36:10 UTC, Yuxuan Shui wrote:
Is there any reasons/difficulties for not implementing named
parameters?
There is clearly a need:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/wokfqqbexazcguffw...@forum.dlang.org#post-pxndhoskpjxvnoacajaz:40forum.dlang.org
On Tuesday, 9 June 2015 at 00:22:09 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 12:08 AM, Adam D. Ruppe via
Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com wrote:
The easiest way is to not use search paths, and instead pass
all the
modules you want compiled to the compiler
On Monday, June 08, 2015 23:18:50 Timothee Cour via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
nim has both overloading and named arguments (with reordering and defaults
allowed): http://nim-lang.org/docs/tut1.html#procedures-named-arguments
and it doesn't seem to cause issues.
Is there a document / thread
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com wrote:
On Monday, June 08, 2015 23:18:50 Timothee Cour via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
nim has both overloading and named arguments (with reordering and
defaults
allowed):
nim has both overloading and named arguments (with reordering and defaults
allowed): http://nim-lang.org/docs/tut1.html#procedures-named-arguments
and it doesn't seem to cause issues.
Is there a document / thread that explains the argument against named
arguments in more details than 'do not play
On Tuesday, June 09, 2015 01:38:56 Timothee Cour via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com wrote:
On Monday, June 08, 2015 23:18:50 Timothee Cour via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
nim has both
On Monday, 8 June 2015 at 09:54:28 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Sunday, 7 June 2015 at 17:41:11 UTC, Kyoji Klyden wrote:
Do you perchance have any links to learning resources for the
D runtime(aside from just the github repository), and also
maybe x86 architecture stuff? (I know intel has some 1000+
14 matches
Mail list logo
