I don't know what exactly you're after, but you can use
foreach on a whatever-they're-called-now tuple (there's been a
discussion about the name which I haven't followed; I mean the
kind you get from a TemplateTupleParameter):
void f1() {}
void f2() {}
void callThemAll(functions ...)()
{
On Sunday, 12 July 2015 at 20:31:20 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Sunday, 12 July 2015 at 17:11:04 UTC, anonymous wrote:
And personally, I'd probably just type out `x.map!fun.array`
every time.
[1] http://dlang.org/hijack.html
Thanks for the comments.
After thinking it over, I think you're
On Sunday, 12 July 2015 at 17:11:04 UTC, anonymous wrote:
And personally, I'd probably just type out `x.map!fun.array`
every time.
[1] http://dlang.org/hijack.html
Thanks for the comments.
On Sunday, 12 July 2015 at 05:18:24 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
This has nothing to do with DMD, DUB, or linking :) Derelict
loads the shared libraries at runtime through the system API
(LoadLibrary on Windows and dlopen elsewhere). Each package has
a default set of library names it looks for. I
https://www.reddit.com/r/datasets/comments/3bxlg7/i_have_every_publicly_available_reddit_comment/
On Sunday, 12 July 2015 at 22:26:44 UTC, anonymous wrote:
You don't need the lambda, do you? - return x.map!fun.array;
You're right.
I don't know what exactly you're after, but you can use foreach
on a whatever-they're-called-now tuple (there's been a
discussion about the name which I
On Sunday, 12 July 2015 at 21:07:34 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
private template givemeabettername(alias fun)
{
T givemeabettername(T : U[], U)(T x)
if (isArray!(T))
{
return x.map!(a = fun(a)).array;
You don't need the lambda, do you? - return x.map!fun.array;
}
}
Very
Is it even possible?
On Sunday, 12 July 2015 at 08:38:01 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
Is it even possible?
Yes, though you need to use an entirely different approach for
closures: make a struct.
Remember that delegates can come from local variable use or a
`this` object being used and work the same way to the
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 08:38:00 +, Tofu Ninja wrote:
Is it even possible?
what do you mean?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sunday, 12 July 2015 at 10:19:02 UTC, Baz wrote:
You can copy a delegate in a GC-free chunk but so far i think
that the simple fact to get a delegate with will allocate
from the GC.
By the way i'd be interested to see the runtime function that
creates a delegate.
i see nothing in
On Sunday, 12 July 2015 at 11:22:41 UTC, Baz wrote:
At least now your Question is clearer and understandable...but
sorry goodbye. I don't feel good vibes here. See ya ^^.
Sorry if I came off as rude, didn't mean to... .
On Sunday, 12 July 2015 at 11:42:09 UTC, ketmar wrote:
nope. there is no way to overload context allocation function,
afaik. at least without patching druntime, and i still don't
know what one have to patch. ;-)
_d_allocmemory
On Sunday, 12 July 2015 at 09:03:25 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
On Sunday, 12 July 2015 at 08:47:37 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 08:38:00 +, Tofu Ninja wrote:
Is it even possible?
what do you mean?
Sorry, thought the title was enough.
The context for a delegate(assuming not a
On Sunday, 12 July 2015 at 11:42:09 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 09:03:24 +, Tofu Ninja wrote:
On Sunday, 12 July 2015 at 08:47:37 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 08:38:00 +, Tofu Ninja wrote:
Is it even possible?
what do you mean?
Sorry, thought the title was
On Sunday, 12 July 2015 at 08:47:37 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 08:38:00 +, Tofu Ninja wrote:
Is it even possible?
what do you mean?
Sorry, thought the title was enough.
The context for a delegate(assuming not a method delegate) is
allocated by the GC. Is there any way to
On Sunday, 12 July 2015 at 10:39:44 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
On Sunday, 12 July 2015 at 10:19:02 UTC, Baz wrote:
[...]
That is not manually allocating a delegate context, and in
that instance does not even allocate. For delegates to class
methods, the context is just the this pointer of the
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 09:03:24 +, Tofu Ninja wrote:
On Sunday, 12 July 2015 at 08:47:37 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 08:38:00 +, Tofu Ninja wrote:
Is it even possible?
what do you mean?
Sorry, thought the title was enough.
The context for a delegate(assuming not a
On Sunday, 12 July 2015 at 16:34:17 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
I've been playing around with this a little more. I wrote this
function to encapsulate a simple operation on arrays.
U array_fun(T, U)(T fp, U x)
if (isFunctionPointer!(T) isArray!(U))
{
return x.map!(a = fp(a)).array;
}
Finally, I decide to use https://github.com/etcimon/libasync and
now it work well.
Thank you for your answers.
Why does the following code fail to compile if the
`writeln(value);` line is present?
public template ForeachAggregate(T)
{
alias ForeachAggregate = int delegate(ref T) nothrow;
}
unittest
{
import std.stdio;
class Foo
{
private string[] _data =
On Sunday, 12 July 2015 at 17:25:17 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
Why does the following code fail to compile if the
`writeln(value);` line is present?
The error message (formatted to be a little more readable):
Error: function test2.__unittestL6_1.Foo.opApply
(int delegate(ref string)
On Wednesday, 8 July 2015 at 18:31:00 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
You can use a function lambda:
auto fp = (real a) = cos(a);
Note, I had to put (real a) even though I would have expected
a = cos(a) to work.
-Steve
I've been playing around with this a little more. I wrote this
On Sunday, 12 July 2015 at 17:33:50 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Sunday, 12 July 2015 at 17:25:17 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
Why does the following code fail to compile if the
`writeln(value);` line is present?
The error message (formatted to be a little more readable):
Error: function
24 matches
Mail list logo
