On Friday, 16 December 2016 at 22:37:13 UTC, hardreset wrote:
To be honest I was having some odd linking problems anyway. I
initially wrapped the FT init function in plain D function and
that kept causing "_FT_ not found" link errors. As soon as
I took all the actual D functions out and
On Friday, 16 December 2016 at 00:40:07 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Thursday, 15 December 2016 at 20:34:47 UTC, hardreset wrote:
On Thursday, 15 December 2016 at 18:30:14 UTC, hardreset wrote:
I have pragma(lib,**fullpath**) in my freetype.d file, is
that the correct way?
Never mind,
On Friday, 16 December 2016 at 18:25:42 UTC, David Zhang wrote:
I though all classes were aligned to sizeof(size_t) boundaries?
I don't know.
Wouldn't it then just be
align(sizeof(size_t)) byte[__traits(classInstanceSize,
SomeClass)] scStorage;
I guess? I really don't have much of a
On Friday, 16 December 2016 at 16:24:18 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
On Friday, 16 December 2016 at 15:17:15 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
Hi
Is it possible to use classes, which do not have monitor and
other DRuntime stuff?
Object can be allocated/deallocated using allocators, but they
are very
I haven't considered alignment here. I'm not sure if you have
to.
I though all classes were aligned to sizeof(size_t) boundaries?
Wouldn't it then just be
align(sizeof(size_t)) byte[__traits(classInstanceSize,
SomeClass)] scStorage;
On Friday, 16 December 2016 at 15:17:15 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
Hi
Is it possible to use classes, which do not have monitor and
other DRuntime stuff?
Object can be allocated/deallocated using allocators, but they
are very complex for betterC mode (monitor, mutex, object.d
dependency).
On Friday, 16 December 2016 at 13:02:11 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
On Friday, 16 December 2016 at 12:40:19 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
[...]
Like any other struct.
[...]
Thank you Nicholas
Hi
Is it possible to use classes, which do not have monitor and
other DRuntime stuff?
Object can be allocated/deallocated using allocators, but they
are very complex for betterC mode (monitor, mutex, object.d
dependency).
Can we have something more primitive?
Ilya
On Friday, 16 December 2016 at 12:40:19 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
It was in DMD sources.
How it can be used?
Are methods virtual?
How multiple inheritance works?
Can this be used in betterC mode?
What different between classes in C++?
Thanks,
Ilya
See also
On Friday, 16 December 2016 at 12:40:19 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
It was in DMD sources.
How it can be used?
Like any other struct.
Are methods virtual?
No.
How multiple inheritance works?
Don't think it works.
Can this be used in betterC mode?
Yes all it should affect is the
On Friday, 4 November 2016 at 23:26:40 UTC, lobo wrote:
On Friday, 4 November 2016 at 14:37:04 UTC, bluphantom91 wrote:
On Friday, 4 November 2016 at 02:59:49 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Friday, 4 November 2016 at 02:28:17 UTC, bluphantom91
wrote:
Hello,
Am I just using getc the wrong
It was in DMD sources.
How it can be used?
Are methods virtual?
How multiple inheritance works?
Can this be used in betterC mode?
What different between classes in C++?
Thanks,
Ilya
Forgive if I'm suggesting something which was already discussed
and dismissed, but I too would love a way to leverage C++ stuff
into D. Can't we go to C++? Meaning there's a C++ compiler coming
from the same hands as D. Couldn't we try to get the C++ compiler
to compile in such a manner that D
On 12/15/2016 10:47 PM, KaattuPoochi wrote:
> On Tuesday, 13 December 2016 at 21:13:26 UTC, Ali wrote:
>>
>> And extending Ali's solution you can actually get the data in
>> to a two dimentional array at compile time and have it in static
>> memory with a small adjustment:
>>
>> static immutable
On Friday, 16 December 2016 at 06:47:15 UTC, KaattuPoochi wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 December 2016 at 21:13:26 UTC, Ali wrote:
And extending Ali's solution you can actually get the data in
to a two dimentional array at compile time and have it in
static memory with a small adjustment:
static
15 matches
Mail list logo
