On 9/27/18 8:16 AM, Atila Neves wrote:
On Tuesday, 25 September 2018 at 14:13:50 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On Tuesday, 25 September 2018 at 12:05:21 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
If you use -betterC, then it's trivial, because your D program is
restricted to extern(C) functions and features
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 09:48:50PM +, Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Thursday, 27 September 2018 at 21:41:31 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > Though I'm not sure what will happen if your C program tries loading
> > two or more D libraries that use this trick... is rt_init()
> >
On Thursday, 27 September 2018 at 21:41:31 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Though I'm not sure what will happen if your C program tries
loading two or more D libraries that use this trick... is
rt_init() idempotent?
It just refcounts itself.
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 03:11:26PM -0600, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Thursday, September 27, 2018 6:16:13 AM MDT Atila Neves via Digitalmars-
> d-learn wrote:
[...]
> > Even easier, compile this C file and add the resulting object
> > file to your (now mostly) D static
On Thursday, September 27, 2018 6:16:13 AM MDT Atila Neves via Digitalmars-
d-learn wrote:
> On Tuesday, 25 September 2018 at 14:13:50 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
>
> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 25 September 2018 at 12:05:21 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
> >
> > wrote:
> >> If you use -betterC, then it's trivial,
On Thursday, 27 September 2018 at 09:58:25 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
For two types to be compared, they must be the the same type -
or they must be implicitly convertible to the same type, in
which case, they're converted to that type and then compared.
So, as far as D's design of
On Thursday, 27 September 2018 at 13:23:15 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Thursday, 27 September 2018 at 05:04:09 UTC, Chad Joan wrote:
As above, I think this might be a very clean and effective
solution for a different class of use-cases :) I'll keep it
in mind though.
Yeah. And I did make
On Thursday, 27 September 2018 at 14:23:48 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 9/27/18 10:20 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
typeid sometimes gives you a more derived type than TypeInfo.
Including for classes and structs.
In the past, .classinfo gave you a different thing than
typeid(obj),
On Thursday, 27 September 2018 at 13:16:58 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Thursday, 27 September 2018 at 05:18:14 UTC, Chad Joan wrote:
How does this work?
The language reference states that typeid(Type) returns "an
instance of class TypeInfo corresponding to Type".
On Thursday, 27 September 2018 at 18:37:27 UTC, Chad Joan wrote:
I will probably end up going with the latter suggestion and
have Extended use the Root's T. That would probably make sense
for what I'm doing. In my case, the T allows the caller to
configure what kind of output the thing
On Thursday, 27 September 2018 at 08:56:22 UTC, Alex wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 September 2018 at 20:41:38 UTC, Chad Joan
wrote:
class Root(T)
{
T x;
}
class Extended(T) : Root!T
{
T y;
}
Sorry for a technical aside, but would this be something for
you?
i've tried both on linux and windows
whenever i try to start a vibe.d project , it fails while running
DUB
giving exist status one on both , here is the thing
linux:
hridyansh@dilawar-PC:~/d/web$ dub
vibe-core 1.4.3: building configuration "epoll"...
On 9/27/18 10:20 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
typeid sometimes gives you a more derived type than TypeInfo. Including
for classes and structs.
In the past, .classinfo gave you a different thing than typeid(obj), but
now it is the same thing:
auto obj = new Object;
// classinfo
On 9/27/18 1:18 AM, Chad Joan wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 September 2018 at 21:25:07 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
...
Object.factory is a really old poorly supported type of reflection. I
would not depend on it for anything.
Roger that. Will avoid :)
You are better off using your own
On Thursday, 27 September 2018 at 05:04:09 UTC, Chad Joan wrote:
The tree nodes are potentially very diverse, but the tree
structure itself will be very homogeneous.
The virtual method can still handle that case!
But, if your child array of expressions is already accessible
through the base
On Thursday, 27 September 2018 at 05:18:14 UTC, Chad Joan wrote:
How does this work?
The language reference states that typeid(Type) returns "an
instance of class TypeInfo corresponding to Type".
(https://dlang.org/spec/expression.html#typeid_expressions)
But then the TypeInfo class doesn't
On Tuesday, 25 September 2018 at 14:13:50 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On Tuesday, 25 September 2018 at 12:05:21 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
If you use -betterC, then it's trivial, because your D program
is restricted to extern(C) functions and features which don't
require druntime. It can
On Thursday, September 27, 2018 2:44:25 AM MDT Chad Joan via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> The spec seems to have the homogeneous cases covered: classes
> with classes or structs with structs. What I'm more worried
> about is stuff like when you have a class compared to a struct or
> builtin
On Wednesday, 26 September 2018 at 20:41:38 UTC, Chad Joan wrote:
class Root(T)
{
T x;
}
class Extended(T) : Root!T
{
T y;
}
Sorry for a technical aside, but would this be something for you?
https://forum.dlang.org/post/vtaxcxpufrovwfrkb...@forum.dlang.org
I mean... In
On Thursday, 27 September 2018 at 08:19:41 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Thursday, September 27, 2018 1:41:23 AM MDT Chad Joan via
Digitalmars-d- learn wrote:
On Thursday, 27 September 2018 at 05:12:06 UTC, Jonathan M
Davis
This is also reminding me of how it's always bugged me that
there
On Thursday, September 27, 2018 1:41:23 AM MDT Chad Joan via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> On Thursday, 27 September 2018 at 05:12:06 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
> This is also reminding me of how it's always bugged me that there
> isn't a way to operator overload opEquals with a static method
> (or
On Thursday, 27 September 2018 at 05:12:06 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Wednesday, September 26, 2018 10:20:58 PM MDT Chad Joan via
Digitalmars- d-learn wrote:
...
That's interesting! Thanks for mentioning.
If you don't mind, what are the complaints regarding Object?
Or can you link me
22 matches
Mail list logo
