On Monday, 21 January 2019 at 04:52:53 UTC, NaN wrote:
On Sunday, 20 January 2019 at 18:51:54 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 1/20/19 1:28 PM, faissaloo wrote:
In Python -1%3 == 2 however in D -1%3 == -1
Is there a standard library function or something that gives
me the Python version of
On Sunday, 20 January 2019 at 18:51:54 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 1/20/19 1:28 PM, faissaloo wrote:
In Python -1%3 == 2 however in D -1%3 == -1
Is there a standard library function or something that gives
me the Python version of modulo?
Hm... (n%3+3)%3 should work.
-Steve
You
On Sunday, 20 January 2019 at 16:51:23 UTC, kdevel wrote:
Online but not on a local installation I frequently land on
pages under https://dlang.org/library/ (API Documentation).
What is the reason for this duplicate docs? The API
documentation looks much cleaner and better structured.
On 1/20/19 1:28 PM, faissaloo wrote:
In Python -1%3 == 2 however in D -1%3 == -1
Is there a standard library function or something that gives me the
Python version of modulo?
Hm... (n%3+3)%3 should work.
-Steve
In Python -1%3 == 2 however in D -1%3 == -1
Is there a standard library function or something that gives me
the Python version of modulo?
Online but not on a local installation I frequently land on pages
under https://dlang.org/library/ (API Documentation). What is the
reason for this duplicate docs? The API documentation looks much
cleaner and better structured.
https://dlang.org/library/std/range.html
vs.
On Sunday, 20 January 2019 at 15:39:49 UTC, Antonio Corbi wrote:
Hi all,
Playing with interfaces and preconditions in methods I get
strange results with dmd-2.0.84.0 but also with dmd-nightly. My
code is like this:
-
import std.stdio;
interface Thing2D {
void width(int w)
Hi all,
Playing with interfaces and preconditions in methods I get
strange results with dmd-2.0.84.0 but also with dmd-nightly. My
code is like this:
-
import std.stdio;
interface Thing2D {
void width(int w)
in {
writeln("Thing2D.width contract w = ",w);
On Sunday, 20 January 2019 at 09:27:33 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Saturday, January 19, 2019 10:45:41 AM MST Patrick Schluter
via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Saturday, 19 January 2019 at 12:54:28 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
> [...]
At least 68030 (or 68020+68851) would be necessary
On Saturday, January 19, 2019 10:45:41 AM MST Patrick Schluter via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Saturday, 19 January 2019 at 12:54:28 UTC, rikki cattermole
>
> wrote:
> > On 20/01/2019 1:38 AM, Edgar Vivar wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have a project aiming to old 68K processor. While I don't
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
