On Monday, 11 November 2019 at 01:28:54 UTC, userTY wrote:
import all; // can see App, Form and Button exported (public)
symbols
---
The approach of using an "all" module is an old hack that is no
longer necessary. Today, the way to approach is to use a "package
module".
On Monday, 11 November 2019 at 01:28:54 UTC, userTY wrote:
On Sunday, 10 November 2019 at 23:53:22 UTC, Vinod K Chandran
wrote:
[...]
You must use a module that has public imports.
Public imports are visible from the module that contain them
but most importantly from the module that imports
On Sunday, 10 November 2019 at 23:53:22 UTC, Vinod K Chandran
wrote:
Hi all,
I am practicing D by writting a win API gui wrapper. I want to
use a single module import to use this Gui lib. Say i have 10
modules like--
"App.d, Form.d, Button.d, Label.d, TextBox.d, ComboBox.d,
ListBox.d,
Hi all,
I am practicing D by writting a win API gui wrapper. I want to
use a single module import to use this Gui lib. Say i have 10
modules like--
"App.d, Form.d, Button.d, Label.d, TextBox.d, ComboBox.d,
ListBox.d, CheckBox.d, Panel.d, DateTimePicker.d"
In Nim, i can import and export all
On Sunday, 10 November 2019 at 01:28:13 UTC, cartland wrote:
On Saturday, 9 November 2019 at 01:02:57 UTC, cartland wrote:
On Saturday, 9 November 2019 at 00:53:13 UTC, cartland wrote:
On Friday, 8 November 2019 at 17:01:07 UTC, ikod wrote:
*snip*
Even this does it.
import requests;
void
On Sunday, 10 November 2019 at 15:59:22 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
I think -flto is the proper flag for GCC/GDC. I don't know if
LTO is working though. A long time ago there were some bugs,
but maybe that's been fixed. You probably just have to try and
see ;-)
Thanks
Am Sat, 09 Nov 2019 20:43:20 + schrieb Per Nordlöw:
> I've noticed that the make flag ENABLE_LTO=1 fails as
>
> Error: unrecognized switch '-flto=full'
>
> when building dmd with GDC 9.
>
> Does gdc-9 support lto? If so what flags should I use?
>
> If not what are the preferred
On Monday, 21 October 2019 at 19:20:04 UTC, Prokop Hapala wrote:
What exactly should I specify to make it link dynamcially and
produce as small binary as possible (without increasing
compilation time) ?
Hi! Sorry, just found your response here. In order to force it to
link dynamically, add
On Sunday, 3 November 2019 at 05:46:53 UTC, 9il wrote:
On Thursday, 31 October 2019 at 03:56:56 UTC, lili wrote:
Hi:
why writeln need GC?
See also Mir's @nogc formatting module
https://github.com/libmir/mir-runtime/blob/master/source/mir/format.d
hi, is mir right now fully implemented
