On Saturday, 28 March 2020 at 19:14:38 UTC, YD wrote:
Hi, now I have a further question: when the C++ class A
actually has a method that looks like
virtual void get_info(std::string ) const = 0;
in order to preserve the virtual function table layout (I found
that if I omit this
On Saturday, 28 March 2020 at 18:01:37 UTC, Crayo List wrote:
On Saturday, 28 March 2020 at 06:56:14 UTC, Bruce Carneal wrote:
On Saturday, 28 March 2020 at 05:21:14 UTC, Crayo List wrote:
On Monday, 23 March 2020 at 18:52:16 UTC, Bruce Carneal wrote:
[snip]
Explicit SIMD code, ispc or other,
On Saturday, 28 March 2020 at 07:33:38 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2020-03-27 20:17, YD wrote:
Hi, I have a C++ header file which looks like
class A {
public:
static A *create();
virtual int f() const = 0;
};
And there is a C++ library file which provides
On Saturday, 28 March 2020 at 06:56:14 UTC, Bruce Carneal wrote:
On Saturday, 28 March 2020 at 05:21:14 UTC, Crayo List wrote:
On Monday, 23 March 2020 at 18:52:16 UTC, Bruce Carneal wrote:
[snip]
(on the downside you have to guard against compiler code-gen
performance regressions)
auto
On Saturday, 28 March 2020 at 07:33:38 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2020-03-27 20:17, YD wrote:
[...]
Classes in D are always passed by reference. Try dropping the
pointer in the `create` method:
static A create();
Thanks! I got it to work for now.
On 2020-03-27 20:17, YD wrote:
Hi, I have a C++ header file which looks like
class A {
public:
static A *create();
virtual int f() const = 0;
};
And there is a C++ library file which provides the implementation, so
that if I write a C++ program and call
On Saturday, 28 March 2020 at 05:21:14 UTC, Crayo List wrote:
On Monday, 23 March 2020 at 18:52:16 UTC, Bruce Carneal wrote:
[snip]
(on the downside you have to guard against compiler code-gen
performance regressions)
auto vectorization is bad because you never know if your code
will get
