On 1/4/22 5:17 PM, kdevel wrote:
Is there any chance to rephrase fsobjects.d such that it becomes a
"header only"/"compile only" file of which no object file must be
presented to the linker?
Possibly. You see, you are importing another module. Since you are doing
that, the module must
On Tuesday, 4 January 2022 at 22:17:38 UTC, kdevel wrote:
Is there any chance to rephrase fsobjects.d such that it
becomes a "header only"/"compile only" file of which no object
file must be presented to the linker?
You didn't show how you compiled your files.
If you want the compiler to
On Wednesday, 5 January 2022 at 16:14:02 UTC, Ben Jones wrote:
On Wednesday, 5 January 2022 at 03:38:54 UTC, Tejas wrote:
On Tuesday, 4 January 2022 at 18:13:56 UTC, Ben Jones wrote:
The tricky part is that the lab machines that the students
will be using don't have a D compiler installed
On Wednesday, 5 January 2022 at 22:22:19 UTC, Christian Köstlin
wrote:
Hi all,
I really like std.concurrency but I now stumbled upon the
following.
When receiving messages as const, they also need to be sent as
const (otherwise they are not matched). Comparing this to
normal function calls I
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 11:29:08PM +, Era Scarecrow via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
[...]
> That said, rolling your own mixins should really be the last resort.
> You're dumping a lot into a single line of code you can't trace,
> follow, debug, or look at.
Mixins are kinda like the nuclear
On Wednesday, 5 January 2022 at 08:40:15 UTC, rempas wrote:
I'm trying to use mixins and enums to "expand" code in place
but the results are not what I expected and I'm getting an
weird error. I have created the smallest possible example to
reproduce the error and it is the following:
Back
Hi all,
I really like std.concurrency but I now stumbled upon the following.
When receiving messages as const, they also need to be sent as const
(otherwise they are not matched). Comparing this to normal function
calls I would expect a different behavior.
```d
import std.concurrency;
On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 09:01 +, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Monday, 29 November 2021 at 14:48:21 UTC, Luís Ferreira wrote:
> > On Sun, 2021-11-28 at 21:59 +, Iain Buclaw via
> > Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> > >
> > > DMD doesn't emit this information. GDB can't work
On Wednesday, 5 January 2022 at 17:48:03 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Yeah, this won't fly. Whatever you pass to mixin must be one or
more
*complete* declaration or (possibly compound) statements. It's
illegal
to pass the `static if` and its else-clause to two different
mixin()
invocations (they are
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 08:40:15AM +, rempas via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[...]
> void test(bool signed)(int num, int base) {
> static if (signed) {
> mixin(type_check!("static if", "i8", "true", "5", "4", "10", "5"));
> mixin(type_check!("else static if", "i16", "true", "7", "6",
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 08:00:45AM +, forkit via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[...]
> Well, in my case, it was nice to see that the oom reaper thread is
> working correctly ;-)
I'm well-acquainted with the OOM reaper; it and dmd are good friends,
and love to throw parties esp. when CTFE and
On Wednesday, 5 January 2022 at 03:38:54 UTC, Tejas wrote:
On Tuesday, 4 January 2022 at 18:13:56 UTC, Ben Jones wrote:
The tricky part is that the lab machines that the students
will be using don't have a D compiler installed (they're
Fedora machines, and I didn't see a dmd package in their
On Wednesday, 5 January 2022 at 08:58:44 UTC, Dennis wrote:
On Wednesday, 5 January 2022 at 05:38:45 UTC, Tejas wrote:
The entire reason I wanted to get a `ref` was so that I can
avoid the `*` :(
I don't know what the real code behind the reduced example is,
but maybe you can structure your
On Wednesday, 5 January 2022 at 10:47:44 UTC, rempas wrote:
There may be a problem in the "type_check" enum but I wanted to
post this reply before I search any any case there is something
else happening and you happen to know. I will update if I found
it
Well, it is specifically the "static
On Wednesday, 5 January 2022 at 09:33:07 UTC, vit wrote:
2) if-else must be in same mixin:
```d
mixin(""
+ type_check!("static if", "i8", "true", "5", "4",
"10", "5")
+ type_check!("else static if", "i16", "true", "7",
"6", "18", "8")
+ type_check!("else static if",
On Wednesday, 5 January 2022 at 09:17:54 UTC, rempas wrote:
On Wednesday, 5 January 2022 at 09:02:53 UTC, vit wrote:
Try this:
```d
pragma(msg, type_check!("static if", "i8", "true", "5", "4",
"10", "5"));
```
Result:
```d
static if(is_same!(num, i8)) {
mixin(base_digit!("5", "4", "10",
On Wednesday, 5 January 2022 at 09:02:53 UTC, vit wrote:
Try this:
```d
pragma(msg, type_check!("static if", "i8", "true", "5", "4",
"10", "5"));
```
Result:
```d
static if(is_same!(num, i8)) {
mixin(base_digit!("5", "4", "10", "5"));
static if (true) {
On Wednesday, 5 January 2022 at 08:40:15 UTC, rempas wrote:
I'm trying to use mixins and enums to "expand" code in place
but the results are not what I expected and I'm getting an
weird error. I have created the smallest possible example to
reproduce the error and it is the following:
[...]
On Wednesday, 5 January 2022 at 08:40:15 UTC, rempas wrote:
I'm trying to use mixins and enums to "expand" code in place
but the results are not what I expected and I'm getting an
weird error. I have created the smallest possible example to
reproduce the error and it is the following:
[...]
On Wednesday, 5 January 2022 at 05:38:45 UTC, Tejas wrote:
The entire reason I wanted to get a `ref` was so that I can
avoid the `*` :(
I don't know what the real code behind the reduced example is,
but maybe you can structure your code such that the subsequent
modification `c = 10` happens
I'm trying to use mixins and enums to "expand" code in place but
the results are not what I expected and I'm getting an weird
error. I have created the smallest possible example to reproduce
the error and it is the following:
```
enum base_digit(string ten, string sixteen, string two, string
On Tuesday, 4 January 2022 at 23:37:57 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Or the compiler would run out of memory before it gets to
optimizing away those assignments, so it would just outright
crash. I ran your code on my computer and got this:
uncaught exception
22 matches
Mail list logo
