On Thursday, 24 November 2022 at 05:41:11 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Thursday, 24 November 2022 at 03:49:16 UTC, []() {}() wrote:
I broke a forum rule by critically analysing your blog?
Wow.
Criticize my blog posts all you want. Just stop please stop
derailing threads. I'm going to delete
On Thursday, 24 November 2022 at 03:49:16 UTC, []() {}() wrote:
I broke a forum rule by critically analysing your blog?
Wow.
Criticize my blog posts all you want. Just stop please stop
derailing threads. I'm going to delete further off topic posts in
this thread.
've modified the code since then so that
`private` isn't used, etc.
Also thanks for that code improvement that you did, quite nice.
On Wednesday, 23 November 2022 at 13:52:18 UTC, ryuukk_ wrote:
On Thursday, 17 November 2022 at 04:39:35 UTC, thebluepandabear
wrote:
I am creating a TUI library and I have a class with the
following constant fields:
```
class Label : Renderable {
const string text;
const
I broke a forum rule by critically analysing your blog?
Wow.
Erm... You went off topic.
On Thursday, 24 November 2022 at 02:00:15 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 November 2022 at 23:35:59 UTC,
thebluepandabear wrote:
Please stop, we get it... I'm not a moderator so I cannot
enforce rules but there is NO need to continue this debate
here. This software 'religiousness'
On Wednesday, 23 November 2022 at 23:35:59 UTC, thebluepandabear
wrote:
Please stop, we get it... I'm not a moderator so I cannot
enforce rules but there is NO need to continue this debate
here. This software 'religiousness' is too much.
I am a moderator and I can enforce the rules. So
That the D module dissolves that perimeters of my types - in
relation to other code in the same module, is a really odd
design decision that I cannot, as yet, get my head around. That
is, I can see no possible way in which this design decision can
enhance my coding, even after having given if
On Wednesday, 23 November 2022 at 13:24:37 UTC, Tejas wrote:
Please let's not repeat previous topics
`private` will be enforced at module scope, for better or for
worse, there has already been a [1000 post
thread](https://forum.dlang.org/post/lqlllioynzfmpaozw...@forum.dlang.org) that
On Wednesday, 23 November 2022 at 22:43:54 UTC, []() {}() wrote:
My last post ;-)
It seems far too many people conflate classes and oop.
You can do oop without classes (whether you would want to is
another question all together).
You can also use class-types without doing oop.
A
On Wednesday, 23 November 2022 at 13:24:37 UTC, Tejas wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 November 2022 at 11:06:12 UTC, []() {}() wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 November 2022 at 09:51:46 UTC,
FeepingCreature wrote:
Why then should a programming language insist that all other
code in the module should be
On Wednesday, 16 November 2022 at 22:51:31 UTC, bioinfornatics
wrote:
Dear community,
I look some day ago to the D wasm page:
-> https://wiki.dlang.org/Generating_WebAssembly_with_LDC
And since then I ask myself can we at compile time convert a D
code to an extern C code for wasm ?
Indeed,
On Wednesday, 16 November 2022 at 22:51:31 UTC, bioinfornatics
wrote:
Dear community,
I look some day ago to the D wasm page:
-> https://wiki.dlang.org/Generating_WebAssembly_with_LDC
And since then I ask myself can we at compile time convert a D
code to an extern C code for wasm ?
Thanks
On Thursday, 17 November 2022 at 04:39:35 UTC, thebluepandabear
wrote:
I am creating a TUI library and I have a class with the
following constant fields:
```
class Label : Renderable {
const string text;
const TextAlignment textAlignment;
const Color color;
this(Dimensions
On Wednesday, 23 November 2022 at 11:06:12 UTC, []() {}() wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 November 2022 at 09:51:46 UTC, FeepingCreature
wrote:
Why then should a programming language insist that all other
code in the module should be able to bypass my specification,
and do as it pleases to my
On Wednesday, 23 November 2022 at 09:51:46 UTC, FeepingCreature
wrote:
The module is the capsule. D is simply not interested in
building a capsule around a class. D does not let "anyone" pass
through, it lets "anyone in the module" pass through, because
the module is the wall. I think this
On Tuesday, 22 November 2022 at 21:45:29 UTC, []() {}() wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 November 2022 at 21:00:58 UTC, []() {}() wrote:
"Being able to declare a “friend” that is somewhere in some
other file runs against notions of encapsulation." (This is the
motivation for that article it seems).
for development purposes. is there are correct way to somehow
(partially or complete) override druntime and phobos? or, maybe,
some code injection/patching mechanisms during compilation of own
code.
18 matches
Mail list logo
